Skip to main content

System of Rice Intensification (SRI)

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Altitudinal Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is an agro-ecological practice for increasing the productivity of irrigated rice cultivation by changing the management of water, plants, soil and nutrients. SRI promotes the growth of root systems, increases the abundance and diversity of soil organisms by keeping the soil moist but not flooded, and provides frequent aeration and conditioning of soil with organic matter. This agro-ecological practice stimulates plant growth by transplanting young seedlings, avoiding disturbance to roots and providing crops with wider spacing to encourage greater root and canopy growth. The agricultural methodology is based on well-founded agro-ecological principles which have been successfully adapted to upland rice and have shown increased productivity over current conventional planting practices.

Technical Application

To effectively implement SRI practices:

  • Step 1: Consider separation of high-quality seeds from low-quality seeds through soaking them in plain or salt water and the unviable seeds will float on the surface of the water.
  • Step 2: Plant the seeds on an unflooded, raised bed with adequate drainage and fertile soil.
  • Step 3: After 8-12 days, transplant single young seedlings into a grind pattern with wide spacing between hills (25 cm x 25 cm).
  • Step 4: During crop growth period, control the flooding and research and follow alternate wetting and drying irrigation practices.
  • Step 5: Consider application of compost and mineral fertiliser for nutrient enhancement.
  • Step 6: Use a mechanical weeder for the control of weeds and maximisation of soil aeration.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced inputs for greater yield.
Increase Resilience
Predictable yields. Higher production equals increased food security/income and resilience..
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
May reduce GHG emissions from irrigation pumps.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_32_SRI_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increased and diversified crop yield resulting in increased farm income.
  • Improved food security.
  • SRI reduces GHG emissions.
  • Existing water availability patterns to accommodate the irrigation schedule.

Drawbacks

  • SRI is a labour-intensive agricultural practice.
  • Occurrence of methane emissions from rice fields caused by flooding.

Alternate Wetting and Drying

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Altitudinal Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Alternate wetting and drying also called intermittent flooding is a technique developed by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) to control water consumption in rice fields (CGIAR 2014). This technology saves water throughout the year in areas of variable rainfall. It is designed as a pick-up water system in cases when water consumption is cut. Water levels are monitored and controlled by the removal of excess water, leaving enough water to sustain crops. Alternate wetting and drying reduces greenhouse gas emissions especially methane, which is emitted from flooded rice fields (FAO 2016). The drying phase helps to sustain and develop plant roots. Moreover, costs on fuel used for irrigation are reduced.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Alternate Wetting and Drying practices:

  • Step 1: Alternate wetting and drying should be considered by the farmer after two weeks of rice transplant.
  • Step 2: The farmer should consider digging half of 30 cm tube into soil to monitor water level.
  • Step 3: When the water level is 15 cm below the soil surface the field should be irrigated again with a depth of 3 to 5 cm before water drains.
  • Step 4: This cycle should be repeated until flowering stage to avoid disturbing reproduction because at this stage the crops are sensitive to water stress.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Cost of production reduced through less use of water.
Increase Resilience
Maintain production with reduced inputs. Predictable yields.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
May reduce GHG emissions from irrigation pumps.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_31_AlternateWettingandDrying_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Alternate wetting and drying maintains rice yields in areas with variable rainfall/irrigation water supply.
  • Reduces greenhouse gas emission such as methane.
  • The technology can be carried out in regions prone to heavy rainfall.

Drawbacks

  • Water levels need to be monitored carefully to avoid water stress which might decrease yield.
  • Not recommended in areas with potential salinity stress as reduced water inputs might aggravate salinity levels and cause yield decline.

Rainwater Harvesting

Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Rainwater harvesting is an agricultural technique of collecting and storing rainwater or runoff in tanks or natural reservoirs. This practice is mostly practiced in arid or semi-arid areas with temporal and spatial variability of rainfall mostly lost as surface runoff or evaporation. Runoff is harvested and utilised as a preventative measure for soil erosion, as well as a water management strategy for irrigating crops and for livestock water. This technique enables farmers to capture and store rainwater during times of plenty for use during times of scarcity. Rainwater harvesting is a technology that maximises the use of existing freshwater resources and is a useful technology for water resource planners and managers in both governmental and non-governmental organisations, institutions and communities.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Rainwater Harvesting practices:

  • Step 1: Create a water collection zone connected to a gutter system.
  • Step 2: Install filters to the water collection zone.
  • Step 3: Connect a hose pipe for easy distribution of irrigation water.
  • Step 4: If a farmer intends to use water for human consumption other than flushing toilets, etc, water quality must be frequently tested using reliable and low-cost/low-tech solutions.
  • Step 5: Use of filters can be considered to reduce particulate and other pollutants but should be thoroughly investigated – as a separate subject – by the extension officer and the farmer, otherwise it could lead to illness. It is recommended that farms utilise harvested rainwater for irrigation and other farming activities only.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
More water available to plants when it is needed.
Increase Resilience
Mitigate dry spells.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_30_RainwaterHarvesting_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Rainwater harvesting acts as a source of water at a point where it is needed, usually stored in a tank.
  • Works as an alternative water source in cases of drought or irrigation system breakdown.
  • Rooftop rainwater catchment construction is simple.
  • Success in rainwater harvesting depends on frequency and amount of rainfall.

Drawbacks

  • Asphalt, tar and wood roofs may contaminate the water making it unsafe for direct human consumption.
  • For potable water collection, lead containing gutters should not be used.
  • Harvested water may be contaminated by animal waste.

Permeable Rock Dams

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A permeable rock dam is a water harvesting technique where flooding rain water is collected in valley bases or other depressions to irrigate crops later/elsewhere, filling in gullies, controlling water flows, increasing crop production and reducing soil erosion.. Permeable rock dams are long and relatively shallow to reduce erosion while accumulating silt and distributing water. They comprise of long low rock walls with smooth crests so that water can spread to avoid overflow from the dam. However, this technology is site specific; it cannot be practiced in areas where there are no rocks/stones and means of transporting these building materials. The impoundment of silt prior to runoff entering a watercourse can be beneficiary to downstream users and can contribute to improved water quality in the catchment

Technical Application

To effectively implement Permeable Rock Dam practices, the following steps should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Consider constructing a permeable rock dam across relatively wide and shallow valleys.
  • Step 2: Permeable rock dams should consist of long, low rock walls with level crest along full length although farmers should consider central spillways where water course has cracks.
  • Step 3: The dam should be between 50-300m in length and 1m in height within a gully.
  • Step 4: Consider making the dam wall flatter on the downslope side than on the upslope side.
  • Step 5: A foundation of small stones should be set in the trench.
  • Step 6: An apron of large rocks is essential to split the erosive force of the overflow.
  • Step 7: Downstream banks of the water stream should be shielded by stone pitching to prohibit the increase of the gully.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Supports agricultural productivity as soil structure is retained and provides access to more sustainable water supplies.
Increase Resilience
Supports adaptation strategies in climate changes scenarios with improved access to water for irrigation and reducing soil erosion.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_29_PermeableRockDams_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Permeable rock dams increase crop production.
  • Reduce soil erosion.
  • The system increases groundwater recharge.

Drawbacks

  • The technology is site specific; should be on a site where rocks and stones are present.
  • Need for large quantities of stone.

Water Spreading Bunds

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Water spreading bunds are barriers used on gradual slopes to slow down surface water and slow filter runoff, increasing the chance of infiltration, capturing runoff sediment, and decreasing soil erosion. Bunds can be built of different materials including packed earth or stones. Bunds can be spread across fields or used in micro-settings around individual trees or plants and should be applied in semi-arid or arid conditions. Bunds efficiently spread rainwater across the system and prevent streams from developing. Implementing bunds in areas with adequate rainfall or irrigation, may cause waterlogging and adversely affect crop growth.

Different types of bunds include:

  • Contour bunds: ridges of soil that follow slope contours and can be implemented at a large scale. Crops are cultivated between bunds.
  • Semi-circle bunds: ridges of varying size build in a half-moon or semi-circle. They are generally applied to rehabilitate rangelands and/or in the production of fodder.
  • Contour stone bunds: lines of stones laid in a shallow dug out areas that slow down the flow of runoff
Technical Application

To effectively Water Spreading Bunds the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Farmers should consider making earth bunds by hand, animal ploughs or mechanised ploughs.
  • Step 2: Contour bunds:
    • Contour lines must be plotted and marked prior to developing the bund.
    • A 40 cm deep infiltration pit is dug directly above where the bund will be plotted.
    • Bunds should be spread 5 m to 10 m apart.
    • Material from the infiltration pit will be piled and compacted to form a 25 cm to 30 cm in height with a base of 75 cm.
    • Soil is piled to form a ridge along the contour. The more significant the slope, the closer the bunds must be plotted.
  • Step 3: Semi-circle bunds:
    • Contour lines must be plotted and marked prior to developing the bund.
    • A centre point is chosen as diameter for the bund is selected (this could be 3 m or 30 m depending on the available space). From the centre point a string is used to stake out an even semi-circle.
    • Excavate a small trench before the bund and pile the excavated material. Pile and compact a bund wall, wetting it often to form the wall.
  • Step 4: Contour stone bunds:
    • Developed on less steep slopes.
    • Must have access to local stones.
    • Dig out a shallow ditch, 10 cm to 15 cm in depth.
    • Lay largest stones at the bottom of the ditch and pile smaller stone upward.
    • Step 5: Regular monitoring of bunds should take place, especially after rain events or after significant periods of time. Repairs should be done if any damage is found.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces soil erosion and enables farmers to maintain agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
Reduces soil erosion in higher rainfall environments, especially relevant as climates change.
Additional Information
  • The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 1991. Water Harvesting. Rome, Italy.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_28_waterSpreading_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Water spreading bunds are implemented on slopes of varying degrees to slow the flow of surface water, increasing infiltration and nutrient capture.
  • Bunds capture water and spread it across an area more evenly, preventing streams, erosion channels and gullies from forming at depression points.

Drawbacks

  • Developing bunds can be laborious.
  • Bunds in areas with adequate rainfall or irrigation may cause waterlogging and affect crop growth.

Zai Pits

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Zai pits are based on a traditional technology approach originating from West Africa that assists farmers working on marginal and degraded land. This approach involves the concentration and conservation of nutrients and water at the crop root systems through the digging of small pits (Zai pits) and filling them with compost, with the aim of increasing soil fertility and water infiltration. Zai pits are dug between planting season and filled with organic fertilisers/composts, which attract worms, termites and other insects, creating mix of material that can be used to fertilise crops. Farmers plant crops directly in these pits, prior to rains and water will infiltrate the pits more easily than the surrounding soil. Applying this technology is laborious to implement, but it  has been found to assist farmers in times of drought or in arid conditions to produce successful crops by maximising the resources available. Zai pits allow for mitigation of desertification in degraded land and an economic use of resources in conditions of scarcity, especially in resource constrained environments

Technical Application

To effectively implement Zai Pits the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Zai pits should be dug with a diameter of 30 cm to 40 cm and 10 cm to 15 cm deep. 
  • Step 2: Pits should be spaced 70 cm to 80 cm apart resulting in approximately 10,000 pits per hectare.
  • Step 3: The farmer should place 2 – 3 handfuls (200 g to 600 g) of organic fertilisers or compost in each pit.
  • Step 4: Holes that are dug between planting seasons will trap wind eroded soils, which are fertile and form good soils for plating crops.
  • Step 5: It is recommended that 3 tonnes of fertiliser/compost per hectare be available.
  • Step 6: Farmers should consider planting crops in these pits prior to periods of rain.
  • Step 7: Repeated application of Zai pit technology on an annual basis will increase productivity of degraded land in the long term.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased soil fertility from zai pit implementation improves agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
This approach to fertilising crops and enhancing nutrient content can aid adaptation, especially in arid and semi-arid climates.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_26_ZaiPits_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Earth that is excavated from the hole dug can be used to form a ridge around each pit to help capture and retain water.
  • Zai pit technology can be applied to marginal or degraded land or in semi-arid to arid conditions to allow farmers to rehabilitate soil/land and productively grow crops.
  • Zai pits allow for nutrient concentration and water infiltration that provides improved conditions for crops to grow.
  • Land that was previously degraded can become productive through the use of zai pits.

Drawbacks

  • Implementing zai pits is laborious and takes significant people power to implement – but may be the only option in marginal environments.

In Field Water Harvesting

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

In-field water harvesting is the practice of increasing water infiltration and moisture retention in the soil. The agricultural technique involves the collection of rainwater runoff from fields that is collected and stored for future needs. This water can be stored in infiltration pits and later used to water the same crops, other crops through an irrigation system (usually high value crops, including fruit trees), or used for domestic purposes. Factors like soil, water, and plant type influence the effectiveness and productivity of rainwater harvesting. This type of water harvesting is generally implemented in areas of very low rain (semi-arid) conditions. In-field water harvesting entails establishing micro-catchments at the farm scale, where sloped areas have been cleared or cropped to direct rainwater to the water storage area (a pit that has been dug to store/hold water). Utilising strip cropping to growing crops while providing a method for directing rain is sometime practiced. The soil type has a limiting factor in collecting in-field water due the infiltration rates. In-field water harvesting saves rainfall water that can be used over a longer period than during and immediately after a rainfall event, reduces the risks of crop failure due to no or limited rainfall, and increases rain water productivity.

Technical Application

To effectively In Field Water Harvesting techniques, the following steps should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Land is cleared, berms are developed, and crops are planted in order to direct water to the infiltration point.
  • Step 2: The catchment areas should be sloped no more than 5 % and the area should be cleared to promote catchment as much as possible.
  • Step 3: The infiltration pit (where water is stored) should be dug at the lowest point of the catchment areas and line infiltration pits with plastic or concrete roofing to limit water loss, and can be used as a source of irrigation for fruit trees and other high value crops.
  • Step 4: Paths can be built of soil to guide water to the infiltration pit.
  • Step 5: Alley cropping, or strop cropping can be used, with areas between trees and crops dug deeper like a trough to direct water to the infiltration pit.
  • Step 6: To access water from infiltration pits, farmers can introduce a pumping system and water can be distributed around the farm as necessary
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Water is available to plants when it is needed. Reduced nutrient leaching.
Increase Resilience
Mitigate dry spells.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Can lock more carbon in the soil. More efficient use of fertilisers.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_25_InFieldWaterHarvesting_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Harvested water used in irrigation systems.
  • In-field water harvesting saves rainfall water that can be used over a longer.
  • Reduces the risks of crop failure due to no or limited rainfall.
  • Increases rainwater productivity.

Drawbacks

  • Major issues with a dug-out infiltration pit is evaporation and seepage. Evaporation can be combated by the addition of mulch to water and seepage can be prevented by including some kind of liner (plastic sheet, concrete, etc.). In addition, large plastic, steel or concrete container can be built or sunk below surface to prevent major seepage. Roofs can be built over infiltration pounds or built containers to limit the loss of water to evaporation.

Supplemental Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Supplemental irrigation (SI) , also referred to as  Deficit Irrigation, is the application of water below full crop-water requirements, generally in drylands to assist crop growth in areas that experience low rainfall (300-500 mm/year). Supplemental irrigation involves adding limited amounts of water to rainfed crops to improve and stabilise yields when rainfall is insufficient for plant growth. Supplemental irrigation is a valuable and sustainable production strategy in dry regions or when experiencing irregular climatic conditions. This practice requires understanding of the yield response to water and the economic impact of loss in harvest. The aim of this technique is to ensure that the minimum amount of water is available during critical stages of crop growth.

Technical Application

To effectively undertake deficit irrigation:

  • Step 1: Determine critical growth cycle of desired crops.
  • Step 2: Experiment with SI strategies to determine critical watering times prior to upscaling.
  • Step 3: Strict management is required to determine the level of transpiration deficiency allowable without significant reduction in crop yields.
  • Step 4: Farmers capable of implementing deficit irrigation must have access to the minimum required water to implement deficit irrigation.
  • Step 5: Farmers must have access to a reliable water source, irrigation systems, including water distribution system, sprinklers and/or drip irrigation system.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Stabilises yield.
Increase Resilience
Adapts to real time rainfall conditions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_23_SupplementalIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increase crop production in dry areas or those experiencing drought.
  • Assist farmers manage crops at optimal times (low rainfall).

Drawbacks

  • Farmers must have access to enough water to meet minimum water requirements.
  • Require water distribution system that is functional.
  • Close management of crops to ensure that SI is implemented at critical crop production moments.

Agroforestry: Alley Cropping

Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Agroforestry is a land management practice that combines the planting and management of trees and shrubs with crops and pasture, providing benefits of soil health, crop yields, resilience to climate change, biodiversity and economic opportunities. Agroforestry encompasses numerous practices, including silvo-pasture, agro-silvo cultural, and agro-silvo-pastural. One successful agro-silvo-cultural practice is alley cropping, where the farmer plants rows of trees, shrubs or hedges between crop rows. Usually hedges comprise leguminous plants intended to fix nitrogen in the soil and provide leaf litter and prunable biomass. The hedges are pruned with the pruned material spread on the ground, to reduce shading and competition with the primary crop. Timing of pruning is important to ensure that the pruned biomass releases nutrients to the soil at a time when the primary crop needs them for maximum crop productivity; e.g. when alley-cropping maize, the pruned biomass needs to breakdown with and release beneficial nutrients into soil from two and eight weeks after planting the maize crop. This approach has proven to be highly successful, with examples in Malawi where gliricidia was alley-cropped with maize where the prunings created a three-fold increase in maize production, which was increased a further 29 % when fertilisers were added. This fertilisation could be achieved with green manure, and other climate smart soil amendment approaches. The space and number of hedge rows to primary crop is dependent upon the field size and the regular growth height of the shrub/hedge. The hedge must not be planted so close that it shades the primary crop. In larger fields, larger deep-rooted timber trees can be planted between groups of rows of primary crop, providing soil benefits, reducing wind-speeds/erosion, and providing timber products.

This approach is considered climate smart as it increases productivity, provides a mechanism for more climate resilient farming, whilst increasing soil carbon levels.

Technical Application

While agroforestry practices are deemed highly beneficial and climate smart, it is important to ensure that proposed practices are appropriate for the specific context – the benefits of the agroforestry practice match the needs of the farmer - and are fit for purpose. Obtain advice from an agroforestry expert before embarking on secondary crop/hedge species selection.

To effectively implement alley-cropping the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Clearly understand the objectives of the intervention and identify an appropriate species for intercropping. For maize and sorghum in a smaller subsistence farm setting, selection and growth of hedge rows of a legumes such as cowpea or Gliricidia can provide sustainable benefits in terms of soil quality and secondary fodder/food products. In larger fields, timber trees can be planted every five to ten crop rows, depending on the height of the mature tree, and the shade-tolerance of the crop.
  • Step 2: Identify and understand key conditions, such as prevailing wind direction, and sunlight to ensure that the field is planted in an appropriate configuration, with primary crop and secondary (hedge/shrub/tree) crops planted in such a way as to benefit the primary crop and not compete with it. East to west row orientation should maxmise sunlight, topography permitting.
  • Step 3: For beneficial hedgerow growth with legume species such as Leucaena, cliricidia, and Sesbania sesban, the trees should be planted in rows between two and four metres apart, with individual trees planted as close as possible - between 10 to 15 cm apart. If planted closely, the trees will favour leaves over step growth, creating more mulch to prune for cover. Note that if rows are planted too closely, the secondary crop can dominate the available crop land reducing productivity. Furthermore, the closer the hedges, the more shade will present, which can depress crop growth, and also start to compete for soil water and nutrients, which is not beneficial.
  • Step 4: Once reaching sufficient maturity, after approximately six months (one-metre tall for legumes)– hedges should be pruned to generate mulch for working into the soil. Then the primary crop (maize) can be planted. Pruning once per month thereafter provides cover and ensures that light penetration is maintained. Planting legumes approximately six months before planting the primary crop can ensure that sufficient pruned material is available to incorporate into the soil to enhance growth.
  • Step 5: After harvesting the primary crop, hedgerows can be left to grow taller so that shade reduces weed grown, and to develop material to prune and incorporate into the soil again during the following crop cycle. However, hedges should not be allow to grow too high or dense as their roots will dominate the soil and out-compete primary crops for water and nutrients.

Before implementing any of these technologies, further research may be required beyond the guidance provided here. The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) has many resources, toolkits and success stories that can support such research.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Alley cropping and pruning of leguminous hedges increases productivity of primary crops such as maize.
Increase Resilience
Helps farmers to be more resilient to climate change, by sustaining productivity and controlling soil health, especially when faced with changing climates.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The planting of alley hedge rows of legumes and the introduction of pruned material contributes more carbon to the soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_17_AgroForestry_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Trees, shrubs, and hedges are incorporated into farming systems and have many different biophysical and socio-economic benefits.
  • Use of leguminous hedges no only provides pruned materials to provide cover, but they also help fix nitrogen in the soil.
  • Hedges planted in alleys can also provide other benefits such as edible seed pods for human or animal consumption.
  • Hedges and trees can reduce soil erosion from run-off or wind erosion.
  • Alley cropping can provide opportunities for diversified income – selling secondary crops and/or timber.
  • Alley cropped timber trees can provide building materials fire wood.

Drawbacks

  • Initial labour requirements will likely be significant; however, this will be primarily at the earlier stages of the intervention.
  • Ongoing maintenance such as pruning and maintenance of hedges will be needed, although relatively minimal.
  • There may be some costs involved in obtaining hedge seedlings.
  • Use of trees rather than hedges and shrubs introduces more labour, but yields more benefits.

Erosion Control

Value Chain
Topography
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Erosion control measures are practices designed to reduce runoff water and wind erosion that wash away top soil and nutrients, degrading soil biodiversity and reducing agricultural productivity. Erosion is a natural, biophysical process resulting from rainfall, water flows, wind, or storm runoff. Erosion is integral to the formation of soils, however human and animal activity, including agriculture and clearing of land, can accelerate erosive processes, drastically impacting landscapes, soils (e.g. quality) and watercourses. In addition, erosion control measures can contribute to reducing rainfall runoff, increased water infiltration into the soil, and attenuates flooding. The intensity of rainfall is directly correlated with the severity of soil erosion; hence, this is a significant problem across the Southern African region as much of the rainfall in the region is episodic, and intense. To prevent or reduce erosive processes control measures can be incorporated into farming systems to reduce or reverse degradation and potentially restore or improve soil quality. Erosion control measures aim to mitigate soil erosion and improve soil fertility by reducing flow and speed of run-off to avoid soil being washed away. Erosion control can be initiated through a number of interventions, including, but not limited to, intercropping (e.g. planting cover crops), mulch, conservation tillage and reforestation, as well as terracing, soil bunds, etc.. Example: Stone Bunds. Lessons learned from West Africa show that stone bunds constructed along contour lines in fields and in key run-off locations can significantly reduce run-off, particularly in steeper agricultural fields. The stone lines reinforce the soil structure in the field following the contours of the land, reducing the speed and volume of run-off, thereby reducing the likelihood of erosion. This is an appropriate technology to implement on slopes up to 15 to 20 degrees. This is considered a climate smart practice as it maintains soil structure and nutrients, in turn retaining carbon in soil, enabling farmers to adapt to climate changes and sustain agricultural productivity.

Technical Application

Without a topographic survey, this technology may require trial and error to begin with, to see how rainfall and run-off responds to the contouring. To effectively implement erosion control measures the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Perform a thorough local study of the landscape, soils, land use and erosive processes that most impact the area: steep slopes, flood plains, high winds etc.
  • Step 2: Source a large number of stones, preferably five to ten centimetres square blocks (from a quarry) or five to ten-centimetre diameter cobbles (from a river-bed). You will need 30 to 50 tonnes of stone per hectare for contour bunds approximately 300 metres long.
  • Step 3: Mark out contours, as discussed in Technical Brief 16 Contour Planting.
  • Step 4: In larger fields with shallower slopes, place stones in rows of two along contour line, interlocking alternately, burying the lower half. The bunds can be between 25 and 40 metres apart. On steeper slopes, stack and bury stones against or in vertical/near vertical walls of contours much closer together (five to ten metres apart) to reinforce them.
  • Step 5: Make sure that stone bunds follow the contours from one side of the field to the other, ensuring that no ‘pour’ points (larger gaps) exist along the way, lining the drainage channel or weir from one contour to the next with stones to avoid or reduce scouring in these locations.
  • Step 6: Following, and if possible, during rainfall events, check the stability of the slope, adjusting stone bunds where necessary.
  • Step 7: At the end of the rainy season and again following harvest, review the performance of the technology, and prepare for the next growing season.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased water infiltration can extend growing period and mitigates short dry spells. Can reduce flood risk downstream.
Increase Resilience
Increased production due to improved nutrient availability and higher nutrient use efficiency.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Depending on practices used, may lock more carbon into the soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_11_ErosionControl_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Erosion control measures prevent the loss of top soils and nutrients.
  • Can help farmers adapt to changes in climate that have include increased rainfall amounts and intensity.
  • Can reduce the impact of wind erosion.

Drawbacks

  • Erosion is a natural process that can be increased due to human and animal activity.
  • Requires substantial labour inputs to construct bunds and other erosion control measures
  • Maintenance is also needed.
Subscribe to Positive

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported