Skip to main content

Subsurface Fertilisation

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Subsurface fertilisation is the agricultural practice of placing compressed balls of fertiliser, known as briquettes, deep in the soil. The balls of fertiliser are known to gradually release nitrogen, feeding the crops with the desired nutrients. This practice is usually carried out in flooded fields and although originally used for urea application in irrigated rice, it can be used with other fertilisers and crop types. Sub-surface fertilisation prevents the loss of nitrogen during floods as the application is placed 7-10 cm deep in the soil, converted to ammonium, which is much less mobile than nitrates. Only about 4% of nitrogen is lost to the environment when applying in the sub-surface, as compared to 35% when nitrogen is applied using the broadcasting application practice. Urea briquettes are small (~2 cm diameter), and home-made manure briquettes – more practical and applicable for crops other than rice – are larger – up to 10 cm in diameter.

This fertiliser application technique is considered climate smart as it maximises fertiliser inputs, increasing productivity and providing a mechanism for adapting to climate change by amending soil properties to remain productive.

Technical Application

To effectively implement subsurface fertilisation, the following should be carried out. Use of briquette machines to produce 1 to 3 grams of briquettes that are larger than conventional fertiliser granules is recommended:

  • Step 1: Prior to application, dig small holes 7 to 10 centimetres deep along planting rows in drained rice paddy or regular field, ideally located in the centre between a location where four plants will be planted.
  • Step 2: Place the briquettes in the whole, below the soil surface, and cover with dug soil.
  • Step 3: Crops should be planted within seven days of fertiliser application.

Following are the main steps for making your own briquettes. Making briquettes leading up to planting is more effective, as they are not stored for too long. A standard briquette machine can be purchased for between USD 3,000 and USD 6,000.

  • Step 1: Collect manure from cow and/or horse waste.
  • Step 2: Allow the manure to moderately dry (so it is possible to handle), but not for extensive periods, otherwise it will degrade. Keep manure out of direct sunlight, or when processing, remove the outer layer before manufacturing briquettes, and do not leave exposed, especially during rainy periods.
  • Step 3: Press manure into briquettes using briquette press machine – see directions below to make your own home-press.
  • Step 4: Allow the briquettes to dry in a cool, dry location, and store for later use.

To make your own large manure briquette press using household items, follow the instructions below:

  • Step 1: Cut the top off a straight-sided 2-litre plastic soft drink bottle at the top of straight side.
  • Step 2: Obtain a tinned food can that is just smaller than the diameter of the bottle. Preferably leave tin un-opened.
  • Step 3: Line the bottle with a plastic bag.
  • Step 4: Place slightly damp manure (cow, horse or both) inside the bag, inside the bottle, filling the space.
  • Step 5: Place tin on top of manure.
  • Step 6: Place small plank of wood on top of the tin.
  • Step 7: Place your foot on top of the piece of wood, and slowly apply pressure to the tin, pressing the manure down, adding more manure if it compresses further than the depth of the tin.
  • Step 8: When the manure will compress no more, remove plank and tin, and draw the compressed manure from the bottle, removing the plastic bag to reveal a cylinder of compressed manure.
  • Step 9: Slice with a sharp knife to discs 2 to 3 cm thick, and use a piece of 2 cm diameter metal or plastic pipe to punch a hole through each disc. Reuse the
  • Step 10: Allow to air dry as individual rings in a cool dry place. As soon as they are strong enough, you can hang the rings on wire to continue to dry. Use in fields within a month of manufacture. The ring increases surface area, and speeds-up the drying process.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
A highly effective soil amendment that increases nutrients and organic matter in soil, and in turn productivity.
Increase Resilience
An effective mechanism for amending soil in the face of changing climates.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
If using fertiliser to amend soil, this approach retains substantially more of the fertiliser in the soil to augment nutrients; therefore, is more efficient.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_67_SubsurfaceFertilisation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • This application preserves the nutrients deep in the soil and nourishes the soil making nitrogen available to the crops throughout their growth cycle.
  • Maximises fertiliser application, as little is lost to the atmosphere.
  • Farm waste such as manure can be repurposed into briquettes for subsurface fertiliser application.
  • Can provide a revenue generation opportunity for enterprising community members.

Drawbacks

  • Requires additional labour to gather material, and to make briquettes.
  • There is a financial commitment for purchasing briquette-making equipment.
  • Briquettes can be made by hand, but it requires additional labour and time.

Integrated Pest Management

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is the careful consideration of all available pest control techniques and subsequent integration of appropriate measures that discourage the development of pest populations and keep pesticides and other interventions to levels that are economically justified and reduce or minimise risks to human health and the environment, focusing on all practical options for reducing or eliminating pesticides. The practice of IPM for crop protection is widely encouraged, as the practice can enhance crop production and reduce risks associated with use, storage and management of pesticides. The integrated nature of this approach ensures that it is climate smart, as it utilises the best possible options to ensure sustainable productivity, which will in turn allow adaptation to climate change. However, as it may require the use of pesticides as one strategy, the climate-smartness may be affected.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage integrated pest management:

  • Step 1: Identify damage and responsible pest. Regular crop monitoring is important, to ensure early identification. Bottle traps are useful for capturing samples to examine and identify a pest.
  • Step 2: Learn about the pest and host life cycle and biology.
  • Step 3: Monitor or sample environment for pest population.
  • Step 4: Establish action threshold. If aiming to tackle weed infestation, intervention must occur before the weed matures and begins spreading seeds. Some thresholds are high. For example, if dealing with caterpillars, soya beans can tolerate a certain level of defoliation without it impacting crop yield.
  • Step 5: Identify IPM response tactics.
    • Cultural methods –planting crops that are adapted or suited to conditions and responding to their water, nutrient and shelter needs.
    • Physical methods – mechanical weeding, such as mechanical weeding or using organic or plastic mulch to cover the ground to reduce weed presence/success.
    • Genetic methods – selecting modified or adapted pest-resistant varieties.
    • Biological methods – using natural predators, push-pull approaches, intercropping, etc. and use of use of organic pesticides.
    • Chemical methods – considering all levels of toxicity – from pheromone deterrents to conventional pesticides.
  • Step 6: monitoring for ongoing efficacy, and adjustment of tactics where relevant/necessary.  Aiming at all times to use chemical pesticides rationally and as a very last resort.

In the cases where chemical pesticides are used as part of an IPM strategy, the Agri-Intel website is an invaluable resource, which provides detailed chemical management advice: https://www.agri-intel.com.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Practical reduction or elimination of pesticide use reduces or removes the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
Increase Resilience
Practical reduction or elimination of pesticide use reduces or removes the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
IPM maximises opportunities for agricultural productivity while minimising or eliminating the use of pesticides.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_65_IntergratedPestManagement_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • IPM is the agricultural practice of combining several practices to maximise benefits.
  • Pesticides are used following the safety information given on the packaging, when other approaches are not effective

Flooding Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Flooding irrigation is a practice where water is pumped or allowed to flow into channels passing between crop rows in areas where farmers have level fields. This flooding system is an effective method of managing weeds and pests, preventing the completion of their lifecycles as they are either drowned or isolated from air and sunlight. This practice is applicable in areas where there are favourable climatic conditions with high rainfall amounts; and is not recommended in arid and semi-arid environments. Flooding is controlled using water pumps in order to reduce waterlogging problems, and fields should not be entirely flooded, with surges of periodic flooding used to distribute water and avoid wastage to run-off, evaporation and creation of anaerobic conditions in the soil. Flood waters can be filtered using a fine mesh to control pests and diseases from spreading to neighbouring fields. Sandy soil is not favourable for flood irrigation as it does not evenly distribute water across the field whereas loam and clay soils distribute water efficiently across the field.

It is considered a climate smart practice because it requires less energy, and can promote crop productivity, whilst controlling weeds and pests.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage flooding irrigation:

  • Step 1: prepare the field, digging parallel furrows and raising beds with the excess soil. Crops are planted in beds, and the irrigation water will flow in the furrows.
  • Step 2: Using a pump or gravity fed water storage, allow water to flow into the field, flooding furrows.
  • Step 3: Insert a fine mesh or introduce a hessian sack at the in-flow point to trap weeds and pests.
  • Step 4: Water release should be moderated so as not to flow too fast and erode beds, and too slow such that it remains trapped at the in-flow point.
  • Step 5: Water release can be more effective if released in surges, taking advantage of infiltration rates and capillary action in soil.
  • Step 6: Observe progress. Avoid leaving soil crusts, which will make water rush over.

A sustainable water source must be identified and a pumping/irrigation system should be used.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Less energy is required to irrigate crops, potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions if generators used for pumping water.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective flood irrigation can increase
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_64_FloodingIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • A flood irrigation system reduces weed growth and acts as preventive measure against spread of pests and diseases.
  • Requires less energy, so reduces costs. Gravity does the work, so less need for pumping.
  • Flood irrigation can work with lower-quality water because the water doesn’t contact with crop leaves, which is usually a concern with waste water.

Drawbacks

  • Requires larger amounts of water than other types of irrigation – only suitable in wetter climates.
  • Is considered more labour intensive as land must be closely managed, and prepared.
  • Land must be level, or manually/mechanically levelled.
  • Cannot effectively operate in sandy soils.
  • Very clay-heavy soil can easily become water-logged.
  • If not managed properly, can be very wasteful with respect to water.

Use of Organic/Chemical Control of Pests

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Locally/home-made organic pest control involves the use of home-made remedies to kill and control pests naturally without harming the crop or the environment. Some of the natural pesticides that farmers can use includes soap water, neem, chilli, vegetable oil spray and garlic. These natural remedies are cheaper than the use of chemicals but should be applied in specific amounts for them to be effective. The field must be kept clean to avoid weeds, which provide habitats for insects and weaker crops that are infected must be removed and disposed of away from the field area to avoid attracting further infestations. It is important to minimise disturbance of soil through digging or tilling if not necessary as this can introduce pests into the soil. Alternative approaches such as intercropping, crop rotation, and push/pull systems can also contribute to preventing the spread of pests. This is a climate smart option as it reduces the contribution of pesticides/insecticides to greenhouse gas emissions, and supports sustainable agricultural productivity. If organic insecticides are not effectively killing insects at the rate the farmer wants/needs, chemical controls can be used to halt pest infestation and avoid complete crop loss. However, chemical control of pests should always be the last resort, as chemical pesticides while often hugely effective, are expensive and must be applied precisely to be effective. Furthermore, if used inaccurately chemical pesticides can contaminate crops and the environment, and can impact the farmers’ health. The use of chemicals destroys natural pest enemies and can lead to pest invasion and resistance to pesticides in future, driving continued reliance on chemicals. For example, ants can be a very effective biological control agent against Fall Armyworm (FAW); however, ant populations will also be affected by pesticides.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage chemical use of organic control measures:

  • Organic pesticides must be made based on the type of pests that attack the field along with their productivity rate.
  • Equipment needed. Small measures (teaspoons or baking measures), plastic cup, plastic bucket (>1 litre), stirring rod or large spoon/spatula. Spray bottles or back-pack pump spray. Tools used in the field must be cleaned properly to avoid attracting other pests
  • When spraying, wear goggles, gloves and disposable masks, and avoid spraying on windy or rainy days.
  • It is recommended that any spray is tested before large-scale application. Spray and leave for 24 hours to see if treatment is effective.

a. Basic neem oil spray insecticide: effective against aphids, whiteflies, snails, nematodes, mealybugs, cabbage worms,  gnats, moths, cockroaches, flies, termites, mosquitoes, and scale.

  • Step 1: Mix 1 cup of vegetable oil with 1 tablespoon of liquid soap in a plastic beaker or cup (cover and shake thoroughly),
  • Step 2: When ready to apply, mix oil spray mix with 1 litre of water,
  • Step 3: Pour spray mix into a spray bottles or a back-pack pump spray,
  • Step 4: Shake thoroughly, and spray directly on the surfaces of affected plants. The oil coats the bodies of the insects, effectively suffocating them, as it blocks the pores through which they breathe.
    - Use mixture within eight-hours.

b. Garlic spray: a general organic insecticide that kills most insects.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Use of organic pesticides/insecticides avoids the use of chemical compounds that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.
Increase Resilience
These can be effective tools to combat insect infestations as climates change.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective control of insect pests can help maintain crop production and avoid crop losses.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_63_ChemcialUseofOrganicControl_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The use of organic insecticides promotes biodiversity as it does not kill pest enemies unlike when using chemicals.
  • Healthy soil is required by applying compost and manure in order to not attract pests.
  • When handling chemicals, health precaution must be in place such as wearing gloves and nose masks to avoid contamination.

Drawbacks

  • The natural remedies are cheaper than chemical control, but they do not kill pests as fast as chemicals.
  • Inappropriate use of pesticides can be harmful to both farmers and food therefore, pesticide application guidelines must be followed to ensure efficiency.

Short Term Reactive Practices

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Short-term reactive practices are control options for pests and diseases once they have reached a level where the economic losses are likely to be greater than the cost of controlling the pest/disease outbreaks and can be used to maintain or increase production. Pests and diseases are better detected at an earlier stage to make it easier to act and prevent severe crop losses and prohibit the spread of pests and diseases throughout the whole field, achieved through regular and systematic field inspections. The practice is considered climate smart as it reduces losses, which in-balance lowers greenhouse gas emissions per tonne of crop produced, it retains agricultural productivity through management of pest infestation and/or disease outbreaks, and is applicable as it can assist farmers adjust to changing climate, and the threat of new and changing pest diseases.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  short term reactive practices:

  • Step 1: Inspecting the crop regularly and systematically by walking through the field following an M-shaped pattern will ensure that the farmer does not just look around the edges, but also inspects in the middle of the field.
  • Step 2: Farmers should carefully examine the crops for any signs of pests/diseases. They may be able to identify the presence of pests or disease through observing the following:
    • If the plant is wilted.
    • Are the leaves more yellow than usual?
    • Are the crops smaller than usual?
    • Do the leaves have spots?
    • Have parts of the plan died?
  • Step 3: Once the foreign specie has been identified, the farmer should employ a method to eradicate the issue thoroughly and immediately.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced losses result in lower GHG emissions per tonne produced.
Increase Resilience
Reduces losses due to management of pest/disease outbreaks.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Farmers can make informed decisions resulting in sustainable losses.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_59_ShortTermReactivePractices_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Short term reactive practices eradicate the pest or disease.
  • The aim is to protect the long-term health of the field/herd for the next season or growing period.

Drawbacks

  • Pests and disease can have devastating impacts on both crops and livestock and can persist throughout growing seasons.

Push and Pull Systems

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A push pull system is a technique that repels parasitic plants and pests that attach themselves to the crop roots and feed on them.. In push-pull, a cereal crop is intercropped with a leguminous plant like desmodium or molasses grass, while a popular fodder crop, Napier grass, is planted as a border around the field. Desmodium produces volatile chemicals that attract predators of the cereal e.g of maize pests. More importantly, by giving a false distress signal to the moths that the area is already infested, these chemicals ‘push’ the egg laying moths away from the crop to seek out habitats where their larvae will face less competition for food. Napier grass also produces volatile chemicals that ‘pull’ the moths towards them, and then exudes a sticky substance that traps the stem borer larvae as they feed. Few larvae survive. Napier grass attracts stem borer predators.  The intercropping is a climate smart practice as it mitigates emission of Greenhouse gases through the reduced need for pesticides. The push-pull system improves food security and boosts farm income.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  push and pull systems:

  • Step 1: Plant Napier and a legume like Desmodium or molasses grass  between every three rows of maize/sorghum as barriers to repel stemborers away from crops.
  • Step 2: Plant the Desmodium first as soon as the rains begin, so it immediately repels the stalk borers before the maize/sorghum emerge.
  • Step 3: Plant three rows of Naiper grass around the borders of maize field.
  • Step 4:  Allow pest enemies such as ants and spiders to enter the field to feed on stemborers.
  • Step 5: Cut grass and fed to animals as forage.
  • Step 6:  Abandon areas that are heavily affected by stemborers until treated.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
A push-pull system supports sustainable productivity by reducing the need for expensive pesticides, and boosting farm income.
Increase Resilience
A sustainable and environmentally friendly method for maintaining soil health and productivity while controlling pests.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced application of synthetic fertilisers reduces greenhouse gas emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_58_PushandPullSystems_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Reduces the need for pesticides.
  • Improves food security and boost farmers’ income.
  • The green technique deals with trapping the pests (pull) and repelling them (push) by planting Napier and desmodium or molasses grass next to cereal crops.
  • The relationship between insect-plant and insect-insect (introducing pest enemies such as ants/spiders) is achieved in order to kill stemborers.
  • Grass planted next to crops can be salvaged and used as forage.

Drawbacks

  • Naiper grass take up space on the field.
  • Cost and lack of availability of Desmodium seed.
  • Difficulty in establishing the Desmodium crop, hence practice not suitable for all farmers.

Resistant Varieties

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Resistant varieties are new crop varieties that improve yield production, are resistant to pests and diseases, more tolerant to drought, salinity or other changing or undesirable environmental conditions. Crop plants used within this practice are usually only resistant to a limited number of undesirable characteristics e.g. pests or drought – but usually not both, and some other desirable traits may be lost while others may be strengthened. Hence, careful selection of candidate species must be undertaken. Resistance varieties common in southern Africa include drought resistant maize, sorghum, rice and cowpea (beneficial legume for intercropping) strains, striga (witch weed) resistant sorghum and maize strains, and others all help farmers adapt to changing climate conditions, by being able to farm crops that survive the increasingly variable climate, which can result in less rainfall, or the presence of new pests. Striga results in crop losses totalling over USD 1 billion per year, whereas research has shown that planting climate resilient maize varieties can lead to up to a 25 % increase in crop yields.

Exploring new pest or drought resistant varieties in a regional will require demonstration and testing in ‘test plots’, so extension workers can ensure that the outcomes are aligned with farmers wants/needs/tastes, and so farmers are familiar with the new varieties before they are mainstreamed. Acceptance of new varieties, and any changes is traits will be critical, as resistant varieties is a key intervention for climate adaptation in southern Africa, as they will allow farmers to remain productive for longer under challenging conditions, and while different crops altogether are investigated.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage resistant varieties, the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Survey farmers and meet with other local and national level extension officers to determine key interventions required – drought tolerance, prevalence of certain pests, etc.
  • Step 2: Research and meet other local extension officers to discuss best methods applied to the agricultural practice of resistant varieties in the region.
  • Step 3: Talk to the agricultural dealers and seed manufacturers about the varieties being offered and their characteristics.
  • Step 4: Talk to the agricultural research departments about best opportunities under climatic change in your specific area.
  • Step 5: Either independently or in partnership with seed manufacturers, establish test plots of viable resistant varieties in key locations to act as demonstration plots for farmers to visit, observe growth and harvest, and test the outcomes. Many conditions may come into play when attempting to mainstream resistant varieties, including visual aspects, harvesting and processing differences, palatability and taste, etc. All of these issues must be discussed with farmers during testing and roll-out to ensure resources are not wasted with varieties that will fail.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced incidence of pests and disease results in higher yields.
Increase Resilience
Healthier and more pest resilient farm and landscape. Prediction of pest outbreaks enables earlier management decisions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced losses result in lowering GHG emissions per tonne produced
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_57_ResistantVarieties_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The practice is widely used to increase yield production, produce pest and disease resistant varieties and improve environmental tolerance.
  • Further combines the best traits of the parental forms resulting in some strengths and weaknesses, resulting in a variation of crops species.

Drawbacks

  • May require investment and/or access to credit, as new seeds will not be in farmer seed banks/stores and may be expensive to kick-start implementation.
  • May take time to launch new varieties and gain acceptance from farmers/consumers/markets.

Continuous Long Term Proactive Practices

Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cultural pest control practices Are pest control management measures to control pests (insects, diseases, weeds) by manipulation of the environment or implementation of preventive practices including using plants that are resistant to pests, raising the mowing height of pastures to shade out weeds, aerating pastures to reduce compaction and plant stress. Several beneficial cultural practices can meet both demands, helping with pest and disease control and minimizing the use of toxic chemicals. In the insect pest management context, cultural practices may be considered as specific crop production practices that may be implemented either in the initial stages of the organic farm plan but also as a continuous plan to reduce the likelihood of insect pest infestation to a crop and damage. They form part of the Integrated Pest management (IPM) Practices and are based on tactics to disrupt pest infestation of crops by having the crop unavailable to pests in space and time, making the crop unacceptable to pests by interfering with host preference or location, reducing pest survival on the crop by enhancing natural enemies, altering the crop’s susceptibility to pests. The tactics or methods used in IPM include one or a combination of the following: Cultural control (crop rotation, use of locally adapted or pest resistant/tolerant varieties, sanitation, manipulating planting/harvest dates to avoid pests). Cultural pest control or IPM results in reduced pests/diseases and increased yields and is a climate-smart practice as its emphasis of prevention helps to control pests and diseases before they occur;  its continuous long-term practices without use of chemicals encourage healthier and more pest resilient crops and landscapes, encouraging the use of beneficial insects  making it an adaptation benefit. The possibility of prediction and recognition of pest outbreaks enables earlier management consultations and decisions. The reduction in losses results in lower GHG emissions per tonne produced.

Technical Application

To effectively implement continuous long-term use of cultural practices, the following steps, as part of the Integrated Pest Management (IPM)  should be carried out, but before taking any pest control action, IPM first sets an action threshold, a point at which pest populations or environmental conditions indicate that pest control action must be taken:

  • Step 1: Inspection. The cornerstone of an effective IPM program is a schedule of regular inspections. This should be regular to identify any new visitors to your crop.
  • Step 2: Preventive Action: regular inspections reveal vulnerabilities in your pest management program, steps can be taken to address them before they cause a real problem. One of the most effective prevention measures is exclusion, i.e., performing structural maintenance e.g by closing potential entry points revealed during inspection thereby physically keeping pests out and hence reducing the need for chemical control.
  • Step 3: Identification: Different pests have different behaviours. By identifying the problematic species, pests can be eliminated more efficiently and with the least risk of harm to other organisms. Professional pest management always starts with the correct identification of the pest in question.
  • Step 4: Analysis: Once you have properly identified the pest, you need to figure out why the pest is in your facility, e.g. food debris or moisture accumulation that may be attracting it? What about odors, through floors or cracks, etc.
  • Step 5: Treatment Selection: Cultural or IPM stresses the use of non-chemical control methods, such as exclusion or trapping, before chemical options. When other control methods have failed or are inappropriate for the situation, chemicals may be used in least volatile formulations in targeted areas to treat the specific pests- use the right treatments in the right places, and only as much as you need to get the job done.
  • Step 6: Monitoring: Constantly monitoring your facility for pest activity and facility and operational changes can protect against infestation and help eliminate existing ones. Your agricultural extension officer can assist you in technical advice to keep pests away.
  • Step 7: Documentation: Up-to-date pest control documentation is important and could include scope of service, pest activity reports, service reports, corrective action reports, trap layout maps, lists of approved pesticides, pesticide usage reports and applicator licenses
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced incidence of pests and disease results in higher yields.
Increase Resilience
Healthier and more pest resilient farm and landscape. Prediction of pest outbreaks enables earlier management decisions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced losses result in lowering GHG emissions per tonne produced.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_56_ContiniousLongTermProactivePractices_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • This practice increases yield production, improves soil erosion, enhances soil quality and biological diversity.
  • Reduces pollution of soil, water, allows for pollinating insects to thrive, encourages microbe activity in soil formation

Assists with mitigation of GHG emissions.

Drawbacks

  • Consistent management of pest monitoring, pest prevention and agro-ecosystem management.

Resistant Breeds

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Resistant breeds Disease resistance is the reduction of pathogen growth in or in a plant or animal; denoting less disease development in a particular breed than that which is relatively susceptible and is specific to a particular strain of disease or attribute. Breeding resistant breeds  . Resistance” means the animal actively fights infection by various means. Building resistant breeds can be done through selection. Selective breeding, sometimes called artificial selection, where different breeds of animals with desired characteristics or attributes like resistance to. drought, heat, cold, salinity, flood, submergence and pests can be developed by selective breeding and thus able to relatively thrive in some conditions which would otherwise not be able to, e.g. This assists in the reduction of diseases, results in healthier productive animals and reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. These breeds create a potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat or diary, and thus a climate smart attribute since by reducing emissions per unit of production (proportionately less faeces are dropped per unit consumption of feed) as well as contributing to food security.,. In the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region, local breeds are more resistant to many of the pests and diseases and may be the best option for some farmers in the Arid and semi-arid areas of the region.

Technical Application

To effectively implement resistant breeds:

  • Step 1: Breed livestock with increased resistance against pathogens or other environmental stressors (heat stress).
  • Step 2: Select animals of higher general disease resistance (resistance to several diseases) using a heritable indicator such as natural antibodies.
  • Step 3: Keep record of good performing animals; unhealthy or easily prone of weak animals should not be used for mating; males should be castrated leaving best specimen to breed in subsequent seasons.
  • Step 4: Breed or inseminate the selected cows with desired or selected bulls or semen of the desired traits.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease, results in healthier, more productive/efficient animals.
Increase Resilience
Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production, thus less GHG emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_54_ResistantBreeds_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • With resistant breeds, selecting of male breeds is a long-term climate smart adaptation because they are likely the most resistant.
  • Farmers should identify females in heat and isolate them with selected male animals. This results in productivity increase, higher resilience and cost effectiveness.

Drawbacks

  • Breeding should be controlled to achieve best practice results and farmers should be able to detect when female animals are on heat.
  • Parental performance records should be kept at all times.

Biological Control Vectors

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vectors are organisms that carry diseases from one living being to another without showing symptoms of the diseases themselves. Some of the most common forms of vectors are blood sucking insects such as mosquitos, fleas, lice, ticks and other similar insects, and rats/rodents. Places such as stagnant water and dumping sites can be ideal habitats for vectors to reside and transmit. The use of natural vector predators can help reduce or eliminate vector populations. The most common vectors in southern Africa are insects (tsetse flies-trypanosomiasis), animals (foot and mouth disease through cattle or people with contaminated shoes), tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF).  Sanitising the life-cycle of vectors, implementing pest traps and introducing pest predators are means of reducing the spread of disease. The impacts of climate change, especially increased heavy rainfall and higher temperatures can encourage vector populations to grow quicker than normal. Simple strategies to control vectors includes keeping livestock surroundings clean, avoiding livestock access to stagnant water, fencing areas off, restricting animal access to certain locations, can all control biological vectors and assist in reducing vector spread.

Technical Application

To effectively implement biological control vectors:

  • Step 1: Research common vectors in the local area and ensure that farmers are informed about the kinds, description, lifecycle and common habitats of these vectors, such as tsetse flies, ticks, biting flies.
  • Step 2: Avoid allowing livestock access to dirty and damp environments as well as very bushy areas as these locations are common habitats for vectors.
  • Step 3: Use of traps or even introduction of vector predators to livestock to manage vector spread could be used. This could include introducing epsilon traps for tsetse flies to promote vector control.
  • Step 4: If rodents are found in or around livestock, introduce rodent control methods such as traps and/or rodent predators (cats, etc) and bury any remains far from livestock areas.
  • Step 5: Fence off areas of high vector prevalence, such as stagnant water, ensuring that livestock do not access these areas.
  • Step 6: Examine any rangeland to determine whether there are vectors in the vicinity such as biting insect, or locusts that may damage maize crops and fruit flies that damage tomatoes.
  • Step 7: Community radio can be an effective method for extension officers to inform communities about outbreaks, or impending infestations.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_53_BiologicalControlVectors_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Identifying the common vectors in the area is a key first step to understanding how to manage them.
  • Using vector traps and introducing vector predators can also help manage livestock exposure.

Drawbacks

  • Biological vectors transport disease that can have devastating impacts on livestock.
Subscribe to Positive

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported