Skip to main content

Banding and Micro Dosing

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

While rotating crops or leaving fields fallow for several growing seasons is good practice, some farmers do not have this luxury, needing to continue planting season upon season. However, this practice will soon see soils depleted of nutrients. In these cases, use of green manure, and organic fertilisers is recommended. In. the last-resort cases where chemical fertilisers must be used, banding and micro-dosing are approaches that rationalise or minimise application. Banding is the agricultural practice of placing fertiliser in a row below soil surface, covering with soil and planting seeds above the fertiliser, whereas Micro-dosing – sometimes referred to as ring-placement - is the practice of placing small, more affordable amounts of fertiliser around each crop plant. Banding is a common method used for basal fertiliser applications and uses less fertiliser than broadcasting as it is applied in rows rather than throughout the whole field. Micro-dosing is applicable where plants are widely spaced and where soil increases the chances of nutrient loss due to leaching. While the use of chemical fertilisers is not strictly considered climate smart, these practices promote economic and rationalised application of fertilisers, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, whilst improving resilience in the face of climate change, and providing options for maintain agricultural productivity.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage banding and micro-dosing for maize and sorghum, the following should be carried out. When handling fertilisers, always ensure that safety precautions provided on the packaging are followed.

Banding – suitable when wishing to save on fertiliser expenditure, but still need to improve production of primary and secondary crops.

  • Step 1: Plough the field using a draught animal-drawn or mechanised plough to carefully open furrows. Depending on availability of mechanised equipment, a narrow hoe can also be used if manual labour is favoured. This can reduce workload and minimise soil disturbance but may require more effort.
  • Step 2: Count furrows and measure length to ensure that you have sufficient fertiliser for area, based on recommended application amounts (see packaging or see advice from supplier).
  • Step 3: Apply fertilisers as a strip or line (band) along the furrow.
  • Step 4: Turn furrow back over ensuring that the fertiliser is present at a depth of 5-8cm below the soil surface and covered by the soil. The basal fertiliser should not touch the seed as it may burn it and disturb its germination.

Micro-dosing: suitable when fertiliser is in short supply.

  • Step 1: in the field, at the time of planting, prepare small pits 5 to 8 cm deep where each seed is to be placed.
  • Step 2: measure approximately 6 grams of fertiliser using a bottle cap or a three-finger pinch.
  • Step 3: place the micro-dose in the small pits.
  • Step 4: cover fertiliser with a small amount of soil, then place the seed. Cover fully with soil and water, or allow rain to wet the ground.
  • Where manure is available, Zai pits can be used to improve organic matter at the same time. Prior to planting, dig the small pit and fill with manure. When rains begin, fertiliser and seed are placed in the hole and covered.
  • The practice includes the advantage of banding by placing the fertiliser below the seed but at a single point instead of a row.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
While seen as a last resort, these focused applications of chemical fertilisers can lead to sustained agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
In some areas, use of fertilisers is unavoidable, especially in areas impacted by climate change.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
These economical uses of fertiliser minimise or rationalise fertilisers, reduce contributions to GHG emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_66_BandingAndMicroDosing_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Banding is the most commonly used method for basal fertiliser applications, and it uses much less fertiliser as it is applied in rows.
  • Micro-Dosing maintains and increases crop production with less fertiliser, crops become less susceptible to diseases/pests and reduces GHG emissions per kg of crop produce.
  • Micro-dosing has been known to double or even triple yields and plant biomass.
  • If using fertiliser, these approaches can save significantly on the cost of fertilisers, as is
  • Can be used to supplement organic fertilisers if in short supply.
  • Both techniques are more economic for smallholders.

Drawbacks

  • Use of chemical fertilisers has a cost attached.
  • Chemical fertilisers are not strictly a CSA approach.
  • Requires a sustainable supply of fertilisers.
  • If small-holders are purchasing fertilisers, they are often only available in 50 kg bags, which often make them economically inaccessible. Agriculture for development projects have been lobbying manufacturers to also provider smaller bags.
  • If 50 kg bags are purchased, fertiliser must be stored in cool dry place – following instructions on packaging.
  • Micro-dosing can be very time and labour intensive.

Biological Control of Pests

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

The use of chemical insecticides and pesticides can be expensive and therefore not an economically viable option for small scale farmers, while also not being climate smart – widespread use of pesticides and herbicides contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Encouraging natural predators can be an effective method for controlling and managing pests in some instances. With governments across the globe discouraging the use of chemical insecticides and pesticide products, biological control of pests is preferred and encouraged - using living organisms to control pests. Natural predators are insects that feed on pests without damaging the crop and can be found throughout the crops. Encouraging natural predators helps in supressing pests during their early and late lifecycles, improving crop production and reducing pollution caused by pesticides use. The introduction of water-fowl, such ducks in rice systems can be a highly effective form of biological control of pests. They enjoy aquatic habitats, consume insects and can even contribute to weeding as tear up weed plants as they look for food. Insect predators have different roles in controlling pests, there are predators that will control pests in the early pest lifecycle where they feed on their larvae and eggs while some are present at the late pest cycle where they feed on mature insects. Some species of ants are natural predators of stemborer pests, and wasp and some fly species larvae are parasitoids (larvae that feed on a host organism) prey on fall armyworm. One such wasp is the tiny (3 mm in length) Cotesia marginiventris which feeds on FAW caterpillars. The minute (0.5 mm in length) Trichogramma was species lays it’s eggs inside FAW eggs, killing the FAW larvae in the process. Earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae, Carcinophoridae), ground beetles and ladybird beetles are also known to prey on FAW caterpillars. The issue with many of these solutions is volume of consumption, which may be too low to impact an infestation. Ants are the most important predators of FAW, as the communities consume larger quantities of FAW. However, pesticides drastically impact ant populations.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage biological control and encourage natural predators:

  • Step 1: Conduct regular monitoring using field walk-throughs and utilise bottle traps with various lures/baits to identify main pests on crops in order to identify any pests.
  • Step 2: Once the pests have been identified, consult with national research institutes to identify the best natural predators, or biological control agents* to address the particular pests. It is critical to understand what options are available and costs associated with each option.
  • Step 3: Implement according to advice received.
  • Step 4: Monitor progress in terms of reduction in numbers and incidences.
  • Step 5: Adjust the approach based upon observations from the fields.

A farmer must study the lifecycles of insect predators and be aware of pests that feed on his/her crops in order to identify the intervention that will the most effective in controlling pests at difference phases of their lifecycles. Farmers can create welcoming environments for certain predators to attract them to the field area

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reducing pests of all kinds can reduce crop and harvest losses.
Increase Resilience
As climate changes, pests and insects will also change. Bottle traps will help.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_62_BiologicalControlOfPests_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Encouraging natural predators helps improve crop production, reduces the use of pesticides which can pollute both the crop and environment.
  • Introducing a natural predator, or biological control agent can reduce the risk of crop failure, and increase agricultural productivity.
  • Archytas, Winthemia and Lespesia flies prey on FAW eggs, with the fly-maggots feeding on the FAW larvae in order to grow. And ants can be highly effective predators of FAW.
  • Ducks are highly effective in rice paddy fields.

Drawbacks

  • Natural predators are often highly specific to a certain predator, and location/geography/climate; hence, research must be done to establish the most effective method of control.
  • Some natural predators do not consume enough prey to reduce infestations, meaning despite best efforts, crops may still fail.

Mechanical Bottle Traps

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Bottle traps are an agricultural technology used to lure insects inside containers (bottles) containing bait of either food or chemical attractants. The objective is to lure pest insects to identify them for pest control, as part of overall pest monitoring, including field walks, observation and crop inspections. In larger fields they are used solely for pest identification. In smaller fields a number of traps can be used as a pest control method, trapping the insects, but this is not a common approach. Bottle traps must be installed in locations close to or amongst crops and across the farm in order to attract insects for identification and should be used throughout all cropping season to ensure that pests can be identified earlier. As a component of Integrated Pest Management, bottle traps with different lures or baits can be used to attract and identify most types of aphids and mites, fruit flies, stem borers, and fall army worm. While many of the lures and baits can be made at home or on the farm, pheromone-based baits need to be purchased from agricultural suppliers. While this introduces costs, bottle traps and lures can contribute significantly pest management, through early identification so appropriate action can be taken. This technology can contribute to climate smart agriculture objectives, as bottle traps and lures can reduce the amount of pesticides used, reducing greenhouse gas emissions; they can help with identifying new pests and insects as climates shift; and as pests are identified or reduced, productivity can increase. It is important for farmers and workers to keep records of pests identified to ensure that appropriate responses are enacted. There could be cases where infestation levels are low and the cost of taking action may be more that nominal crop losses. However, the opposite may be true, but decisions cannot be made without relevant information for extension workers to discuss with farmers.

Technical Application

To effectively use mechanical bottle traps, the following should be carried out:

Bottle-trap

  • Step 1: Obtain 2L plastic water or soft-drink bottles.
  • Step 2: Rinse bottles thoroughly to avoid contents affecting lure.
  • Step 3: Cut bottle horizontally using sharp scissors or knife, ensure that the top-half is slightly shorter than lower-half.
  • Step 4: Turn the shorter top-half upside down and insert into lower-half ensuring the top- half does not touch the lower surface of the bottom-half.
  • Step 5: Poke holes in both sides, penetrating both layers (top and bottom halves) and insert string, cord, or wire to create a handle.
  • Step 6: Hang on tree branches or on thick wire or wooden stands around field perimeter and in larger fields within fields.

Specially designed all army worm traps can be purchased at agricultural suppliers. Farmers may also need a magnifying glass to identify insects.

Lures or bait

  • Step 1: Identify the types of insect or pest you wish to lure, to ensure the correct mix.
    • For fall army worms, use a pheromone lure – which should be purchased from an agricultural supplier.
    • For maize stalk/stem-borers, again pheromone bait is the most effective.
    • Flies are attracted by sugar-based solutions, or protein (meat) based for carrion flies.
    • Fruit flies are attracted by ripe-fruit, cider vinegar, beer and wine.
  • Step 2: Place 2 to 4 cm of lure at the bottom of the lower half of the bottle, depending on size of the bottle – the larger the bottle, the more lure. Ensure that the lure smell must be strong, but not too intense so that it attracts insects rather than chasing them away.
  • Step 3: Use only one lure per bottle trap as more than one might cause contamination leading to ineffective attractants.
  • Step 4: Clearly mark bottles indicating the type of lure in use – permanent marker pen.

Use of disposable gloves is advisable when handling lures.

Unopened pheromone lure packets should be kept in a cool, dry places – preferably a refrigerator.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Can lead to reduced usage of pesticides, hence reducing GHG emissions.
Increase Resilience
As climate changes, pests and insects will also change. Bottle traps will help.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The use of bottle traps can be used to identify pests for control, supporting productivity through appropriate pest control.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_61_MechanicalBottleTraps_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Bottle trapping is a cheap and effective method for monitoring insects on a farm and identifying those that may affect productivity and/or lead to significant losses.
  • This technique can be used to identify the insect that are infesting the field and which areas they are more concentrated, providing information for targeted interventions.
  • In smaller fields, or in times of intense infestation, bottle traps themselves can be used to lure and control pests.

Drawbacks

  • Precaution is required when handling chemical-based lures as they can be harmful to humans and animals, and can negatively impact crop yield if used incorrectly.
  • Some lures can only be purchased at agricultural suppliers.
  • Cannot be used operationally to control pests in larger fields.

Weeding by Hand/Hoe

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A weed plant is an unwanted plant that grows among and competes with crops for water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space. The removal of such plants from fields – known as ‘weeding’ - is vital to enhancing crop growth. They can be removed by cutting their roots either by hand or using an implement such as a hoe. Some cereal crops like rice and maize attract weeds that are herbicide resistant; hence, the use of a hoe in removing the weeds is the most effective practice. However, as mechanic weeding can result in release of weed seeds into the soils as the hoe makes contact with the plant, weeding by-hand is the best way for weed removal to prevent weed seeds from falling onto the ground for further germination; this can increase the labour intensity of weeding considerably. This is a climate smart practice as it mitigates the emission of greenhouse gases from herbicides into the atmosphere, land and water systems. Furthermore, weeding helps maintain sustainable agricultural productivity, when considered an integral part of farm management and operations. However, weeding has been identified as one of the largest labour inputs for subsistence agriculture, accounting for between 30 and 50 % of on-farm labour requirements.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  mechanical weeding:

  • Step 1: Farmers should be able to identify weeds resistance to herbicides.
  • Step 2: Examine fields to understand level of weed infestation – can they be easily and effectively removed using a hoe, without spreading seeds, or will manual weeding be necessary.
  • Step 3: Attempt to quantify the amount of labour needed. Can the work be completed by the adults on the farm, or will additional labour be required? Will youths be involved in weeding? Will they miss school?
  • Step 4: Begin removal of weeds, ensuring that weeds are uprooted and removed from the field to avoid regeneration. A hoe must have a long handle to be able to work effectively and the hoe blade must not be too sharp in order to cut weeds without going through crops and spreading seed and cuttings.
  • Step 5: Weeding should take place a minimum of three times over the growing season – one week before planting crops, three weeks after planting (when the crop has two to three leaves), and two months after planting (milk-stage ). The aim is to reduce or eliminate the product of seeds in the weed plants.
  • Step 6: Draft animal-drawn cultivators can reduce labour requirements but should only be used to cultivate soil to a shallow depth, retaining soil structure, but not disturbing soil. Weeds should be collected by hand afterwards. Deeper tilling or turning of the soil with the wrong implement may cause more harm than good.
  • Step 7: Weeding must be sustained year on year to reduce prevalence. It is important to caution farmers that results may not be seen in significant reduction of plants until year-two of a weeding programme.
  • Step 8: Obnoxious weeds – such as Striga, etc – should be burned once pulled, preferably away from the field, in order to eradicate their presence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Weeding by hand is an effective method of controlling weeds, and ensuring maximum productivity.
Increase Resilience
A regular and diligent weeding strategy will maintain productivity in a changing climate.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Mitigates emission of greenhouse gases from release of herbicides into the atmosphere.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_60_WeedingbyHandHoe_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Weeding can reduce competition for crops in terms of water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space, making a crop more productive.
  • Weeding is cheaper than the use of herbicides.
  • Weeding by hand or hoe reduces the use of chemicals however, it is as effective as using herbicides.
  • Some weeds produce noxious gases which can have negative impacts on crop growth.

Drawbacks

  • Some of the cereal crops attract weeds that are resistant to herbicides.
  • Manual and mechanical weeding can be physically demanding and may require additional labour resources for larger fields.
  • Manual weeding requires approximately 25 % more labour than using herbicides.

Vaccination Campaigns

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vaccination is the administration of immunisation injections to animals in order to prevent, control spread of diseases.  Vaccination campaigns involve administration of vaccine doses to a large population over a short period of time. The veterinary services departments or equivalent of respective countries normally gives free vaccinations to the farming community's animals for diseases which are of either economic significance to people's livelihoods or those that maybe of zoonotic importance (communicable to man from animals). These campaigns are usually fully funded by the government, NGOs to reduce disease outbreaks, prevent spread of an outbreak or improve national herd productivity, and are designed to reach as much livestock as possible. In most countries, free vaccinations are offer for the following diseases: Anthrax(-Cattle), Quarter evil or black quarter disease (Cattle), Contagious abortion (Cattle), Rabies (Dogs & Cats), Foot and Mouth Disease(Cattle)_ as per OIE designation in Disease Control Zones.

 For the message to reach farmers, community radios and involvement of traditional leadership can be used to encourage farmers to participate in vaccination campaigns.  This will help to gain trust and confidence from farmers for the campaign to be successful. Vaccination campaigns is a climate smart practice as it ensures a healthy population able to utilize feed efficiently with a reduced population discharge thus reduced GHG emission.

Technical Application

To effectively implement vaccination campaigns:

  • Step 1: Networks that notify farmers about upcoming vaccination campaigns must be established to promote the significance of vaccinating animals across the country. This can be promoted through government bulletins and community radio, utilising extension networks, village level administration, and traditional leadership.
  • Step 2: Vaccination parks for cattle can be set up by veterinary officials to restrain livestock movement that might increase disease spreading.
  • Step 3: Goats and sheep can be vaccinated at their locations where officials will move from one village to another to reach more population.
  • Step 4: Training of personnel is important to ensure that vaccination is carried out before seasonal outbreaks and prevent the spread of disease.
  • Step 5: Commence campaigns one month prior to the season when outbreaks are most common or upon notice of a disease incidence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Livestock population with a potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_55_VaccinationCampaigns_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The objectives of vaccination campaigns are to reduce the number of animals that are affected by disease outbreaks and prevent treatable diseases from reducing national herd population which may affect farm income.
  • Awareness must be established in order to gain farmers trust and involvement for the campaign to be successful.

Drawbacks

  • No 100% guarantee of protection of animals/birds.
  • Postpone vaccination campaigns if an outbreak is in progress.
  • For ring vaccinations upon outbreaks, proper delineation of the perimeter is important.

Alternative Breeds

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

The Alternative breeds approach involves substitution of breeds, introducing a new (alternative) breed with a current breed to potentially increase production levels in a farm. Breed substitution involves genetic improvement of cattle and goats especially in dairy farming and meat production. Alternative breeds are introduced in order to ascertain competition between breeds based on health, fertility, performance, profits and management requirements. The substitution breeds are picked because there some traits that may be lacking in current breeds at the farm. For example, some farmers in Malawi who have introduced the Black Australop breed of chicken, either by crossbreeding with local chickens or replacing the local chicken altogether. This breed produces much more meat and lays more eggs, which increases farm production and income. This is a climate smart option as it introduces breeds that may require less water or can manage with lower quality feed – thereby reducing costs, and risks.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage alternative breeds:

  • Step 1: Consult with national agricultural research and extension services to identify adaptable breeds available in the country/region, noting type of traits suitable for the particular ecological zone, and how to access stock. Traits to focus-on include health, milk production, disease tolerance, fertility, economic performance and adaptation to climate change and climate variability. Assisting with sourcing potential alternative breeds is a key role for Extension Officers.
  • Step 2: Before selecting a substitution breed, the current breed must be evaluated to identify traits that are lacking, as well as compatibility. This will help in identifying traits that need to be improved.
  • Step 3: Determine the cost effectiveness of the new breed to the area and or farmer, in terms of feed conversion rates, disease resistance, environmental conservation etc.
  • Step 4: Consistently keep record of the livestock performance and behaviour for discussion with other farmers and extension officers.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Switching to alternative breeds can increase productivity in meat, milk and egg production.
Increase Resilience
Changing to alternative breeds can form part of a successful adaptation strategy as climates change.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_51_AlternativeBreeds_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Alternative breeds are used to improve the genetic qualities of livestock.
  • This agricultural practice improves biological diversity, ensures food security, increases farm income and most importantly reduces risk as cross breeds in future will be more resilient to climatic variations.

Drawbacks

  • Requires research to identify suitable breeds.
  • Livestock will require frequent monitoring to ensure cross-breeding is yielding required results.
  • Replacement breeds should also be monitored to ensure they are adjusting to the local conditions.

Cut and Carry

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cut and carry is the agricultural practice of cutting and carrying fodder crops away from the field that they are grown in to feed to livestock. Fodder trees, shrubs or grasses are sources for livestock feed in this practice. Cut and Carry is a key CSA practice where overgrazing is a problem. This practice takes pressure off grazing land at critical periods, reduces land degradation caused by livestock and increases soil organic matter, while still feeding livestock for productive outcomes. This practice can also be used in more intensive livestock production where livestock are kept housed for periods stretching from half a year to a year and improved nutrition is required. However, fodder production can be costly in terms of cultivation, requiring significant management over and above the livestock themselves. Fodder is collected from sites where it grows naturally, or it can be grown in fodder banks, hedges, boundaries, etc. Feeding livestock using this approach can ensure the supply of a large quantity of high quality and palatable fodder within a short time, as well ensuring soil is not disturbed through open grazing systems, thus a good CSA practice. It can be adapted to the farmer’s needs and can provide a way of introducing the farmer to the concept of improving livestock at the same time as conserving soil.

Technical Application

To effectively implement cut and carry systems:

  • Step 1: Cut and carry commences with the cutting of the crop.
  • Step 2: Cut crop when plants are fully mature (vegetative growth and plant sugars are at their peak). This ensures that protein, digestible energy and dry matter percentage are at their highest potential.
  • Step 3: Fodder can be fed directly or dried as hay or preserved as silage to conserve its value and be fed to livestock during the dry season or other critical times throughout the year.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Fodder can be harvested on multiple occasions during times of plenty and preserved for later, rather than leaving as standing hay.
Increase Resilience
Reduces pressure of grazing by limiting period livestock tread on land causing denudation at critical periods (with less cover).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_46_CutAndCarry_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Improves fodder production and farm income.
  • Growing fodder crops in rainy seasons encourages fodder conservation for dry season feeding.
  • Can be combined with crop rotation and intercropping to form part of positive farm management practices.
  • Cut and carry can relieve pressure from pasture and grazing land, contributing to control of over-grazing, while improving soil quality.
  • Can create job opportunities and income generation for youth farmers.

Drawbacks

  • The practice will require additional labour resources.
  • Can be costly in terms of management.
  • Farmers must have enough land to grow fodder on or have access to communal land.
  • Soil condition in the fodder fields must be carefully monitored to ensure that soil nutrients aren’t depleting.
  • Fodder storage must be monitored to ensure bacteria and mould do not affect the quality of feed.

Fodder

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Fodder is the agricultural term for animal feed. Fodder trees and shrubs play an important role in bridging the gap between livestock feed requirements and the low quality and quantity of feeds available to many farmers. As well as providing feed or acting as a feed supplement for livestock, fodder trees and shrubs supply other benefits, such as firewood and erosion control. Fodder trees are either grown in-situ, from seed, and others are planted in nurseries and then transplanted to the field at the beginning of the rainy season. The transplanting method can be more successful than the direct planting - as high as 34 % better, but with a 24 % increase in cost per plant. Benefits of using fodder trees and shrubs as a dietary supplement include improved growth, health and reproductive capacity, and increased milk and meat production, mostly through increased protean uptake. Fodder trees and shrubs can be planted as living fences, field boundaries and in tree/shrub plantations. Popular species include African acacias, and Atriplex nummularia, Cassia petersiana, C. mopane, D. cineria, F. albida, Julbernadia paniculata, P. reclinata, Piliostigma thonningii, Swartizia madagascariensis and Trema orientalis.

Farmers of all categories can use this climate smart sustainable approach to produce both livestock and field crops to obtain improve benefits, improving nutrition for livestock animals, improving soil health, reducing cost of livestock feeding, and as a result increasing income

Technical Application

To effectively carry out fodder tree-shrub production using a nursery environment – a covered or exposed separate planting area, often close to the farm so saplings can be tended easily - consider the following steps:

  • Step 1: Identify one or more suitable species for fodder production, looking at suitable climatic, soil requirements, nutritional value and palatability, also considering source-plant (for cuttings) or seed availability.
  • Step 2: Take cuttings of up to *1 metre in length from mature trees, cutting at an angle. Cutting should be planted within three days, and if transported, cutting end should be covered in wax or petroleum jelly.
  • Step 3: Cuttings should be planted in 10 to 15 cm of soil either directly where they will grow or shallower in polythene planting cups.
  • Step 4: Fodder crops should be planted as the rainy starts, providing sufficient water and mobilising enough nutrients to assist rapid growth.
  • Step 5: Harvesting is again species specific*, and it is important to determine if drying prior to feeding, affects palatability or nutritional value.
  • Step 6: Harvesting frequency should also be determined independently*as plants mature to ensure sustainable production that does not stunt long-term growth and productivity.
  • Step 7: The farmer should consider how much fodder needs to be consumed immediately, how much dried as hay, and how much chopped and compressed to make silage.

Length of cutting, period prior to transplantation, and harvest quantities vary from species to species. Seek guidance from an agroforestry specialist or farmers that have experience with the process when selecting species, and how specifically to plant, manage and harvest fodder crops. An important element to understand is the volume of tree or shrub-based fodder each animal will require.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Higher meat and/or diary production per unit area of land.
Increase Resilience
Diversification of diet can mitigate the effects of drought on availability of fodder in pasture/ rangeland. Co-benefits in improving soil fertility and reducing erosion.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Woody shrubs and trees lock carbon.
Additional Information
  • Franzel, S., Carsan, S. Lukuyu, B, Sinja, J. Wambugu, C. 2014. Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 6
  • World Agroforestry Centre, 2019. Fodder.
  • Smith, O.B. 1994. Feeding fodder from trees and shrubs: Better Farming Series No. 42. Food and Agriculture organisation of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
  • Karanja G.M. and C.M. Wambugu 2004. Fodder Trees for More Milk and Cash. Ministry of Agriculture (Kenya)/Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Chakeredza, S., Hove, L., Akinnifesi, K.K., Franzel, S., Ajayim, O.C., and Sileshi, G., 2007.Managing fodder trees as a solution to human–livestock food conflicts and their contribution to income generation for smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Natural Resources Forum 31 286–296
  • Steven Franzel, S., Carsan, S., Lukuyu, B., Sinja, J. and Wambugu, C.2012. Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_44_FodderShrubsTrees_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Fodder trees and shrubs can be highly beneficial sources of feed and nutrition for livestock, augmenting, or completely replacing traditional grazing.
  • Can be utilised when over-grazing has occurred, to allow range land to regenerate.
  • Fodder trees and shrubs add vital nutrients to the soil.
  • Fodder trees and shrubs can provide other benefits, including acting as living fences, and wind-breaks, as well as supplying firewood.
  • Crop rotation is important and fodder crops often act as nitrogen fixers (legumes) as well.
  • Fodder crops can also act as cover crops protecting and maintaining soil quality.

Drawbacks

  • Growing fodder can be laborious.
  • The number of fodder trees and shrubs may be extensive, therefore sufficient land is required.
  • Not only does the gathering of fodder require additional labour, but the harvested crop also requires management.

Use of Feed Supplements

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

General Feed Supplements are used to increase nutrients in livestock diets, with the aim of maintaining or improving livestock health through adequate animal nutritional balance and therefore productivity of milk or meat. These supplements include vitamins, amino acids, minerals, and other nutrients. Supplementary feeding can becoming either a regular part of the production cycle to help match feed demand to feed supply, assisting livestock farmers meet production requirements as defined by market specifications, or reserved for times of shortage during dry spells and/or droughts. The extent to which supplementary feeding is applied depends on the farm/business objectives and seasonal conditions. This is especially true in areas of low-quality crop residues and low quality pasture land.

Feed supplements are presented in granular, powder or block form and used during milk production and fattening stages for meat production. However, if consumed in excess feed supplements can be harmful to animals causing toxicity and if persistent, death.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Improved digestibility, Improved protein content:

  • Step 1: Inform farmers of the possible benefits of increased dietary protein in their livestock in order to implement dietary supplements.
  • Step 2: Identify a supplement contain the key amino acids - Methionine, Lysine, Threonine, and Tryptophan, in consultation with suppliers and veterinarians.
  • Step 3: Added supplements to green plant residue (silage) as guided on packaging or by supplier to increase the efficiency of protein in livestock. Ensure that supplement amounts are suitable for animals and the type of feed being supplemented.
  • Step 4: Ensure that supplements sourced will be consistently available from suppliers in the region. These supplements can be purchased at most agricultural shops, including rural areas.
  • Step 5: As a low-cost option, farmers can formulate rations specific to their livestock. These rations are only for domestic use and not commercial.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Can supplement conventional feed to enhance productivity
Increase Resilience
Can help livestock get through lean periods by preserving fodder.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_42_UseofFeedSupplements_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Feed supplements are used to balance animal nutrition, resulting in high market value and quality of livestock.
  • They help improve animal productivity and nutrition.
  • Beneficial in areas of poor pasture or during drought seasons where animal feeds are scarce.

Drawbacks

  • Excessive consumption of supplements can be toxic to animals and can lead to death if over consumption persists.

Improved Digestibility, Improved Protein Content

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Improved protein content in animal feed can positively impact productivity, such as the quality and quantity of meat and milk.  With the increase in global demand for meat and dairy products, the increase of protein in livestock diets is extremely important. Key to the absorption of protein in livestock diets is the improved digestibility of protein. For protein to be utilised efficiently by livestock i.e. consumed and converted into body protein and resulting in bigger and better-quality meat, certain amino acids need to be present. Thus, to maximise protein deposition in livestock, the required amino acids must also be included in the feed. Amino acids have been added to livestock feed for over 40-years. The most common amino acids added to feeds are Methionine, Lysine, Threonine, and Tryptophan. With the expansion of inexpensive plant-based proteins (soybeans etc.) and increasing demands for meat, plant-based proteins offer an alternative or supplement to amino-acids, contributing to greater efficiency of conversion of proteins from feed to meat. Plant-based proteins also require less monitoring than synthetic additives, but amino acids are often needed to maintain digestibility. Improved livestock productivity and conversion is climate smart because there is more efficient conversion of food to weight gain and less livestock pressure on land, supporting a more efficient value chain.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Improved digestibility, Improved protein content:

  • Step 1: Inform farmers of the possible benefits of increased dietary protein in their livestock in order to implement dietary supplements.
  • Step 2: Identify a supplement contain the key amino acids - Methionine, Lysine, Threonine, and Tryptophan, in consultation with suppliers and veterinarians.
  • Step 3: Added supplements to green plant residue (silage) as guided on packaging or by supplier to increase the efficiency of protein in livestock. Ensure that supplement amounts are suitable for animals and the type of feed being supplemented.
  • Step 4: Ensure that supplements sourced will be consistently available from suppliers in the region. These supplements can be purchased at most agricultural shops, including rural areas.
  • Step 5: As a low-cost option, farmers can formulate rations specific to their livestock. These rations are only for domestic use and not commercial.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Less feed is required to reach the same levels of production. Potentially this means less livestock pressure on land.
Increase Resilience
Less is required to reach the same levels of production. Potentially this means less livestock pressure on land.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_41_ImprovedDigestibilityImproved_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Protein absorption in livestock contributes to increased meat and milk production.
  • Less livestock pressure on land.

Drawbacks

  • Synthetic amino acids require constant monitoring.
Subscribe to Neutral

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported