Skip to main content

Flooding Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Flooding irrigation is a practice where water is pumped or allowed to flow into channels passing between crop rows in areas where farmers have level fields. This flooding system is an effective method of managing weeds and pests, preventing the completion of their lifecycles as they are either drowned or isolated from air and sunlight. This practice is applicable in areas where there are favourable climatic conditions with high rainfall amounts; and is not recommended in arid and semi-arid environments. Flooding is controlled using water pumps in order to reduce waterlogging problems, and fields should not be entirely flooded, with surges of periodic flooding used to distribute water and avoid wastage to run-off, evaporation and creation of anaerobic conditions in the soil. Flood waters can be filtered using a fine mesh to control pests and diseases from spreading to neighbouring fields. Sandy soil is not favourable for flood irrigation as it does not evenly distribute water across the field whereas loam and clay soils distribute water efficiently across the field.

It is considered a climate smart practice because it requires less energy, and can promote crop productivity, whilst controlling weeds and pests.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage flooding irrigation:

  • Step 1: prepare the field, digging parallel furrows and raising beds with the excess soil. Crops are planted in beds, and the irrigation water will flow in the furrows.
  • Step 2: Using a pump or gravity fed water storage, allow water to flow into the field, flooding furrows.
  • Step 3: Insert a fine mesh or introduce a hessian sack at the in-flow point to trap weeds and pests.
  • Step 4: Water release should be moderated so as not to flow too fast and erode beds, and too slow such that it remains trapped at the in-flow point.
  • Step 5: Water release can be more effective if released in surges, taking advantage of infiltration rates and capillary action in soil.
  • Step 6: Observe progress. Avoid leaving soil crusts, which will make water rush over.

A sustainable water source must be identified and a pumping/irrigation system should be used.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Less energy is required to irrigate crops, potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions if generators used for pumping water.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective flood irrigation can increase
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_64_FloodingIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • A flood irrigation system reduces weed growth and acts as preventive measure against spread of pests and diseases.
  • Requires less energy, so reduces costs. Gravity does the work, so less need for pumping.
  • Flood irrigation can work with lower-quality water because the water doesn’t contact with crop leaves, which is usually a concern with waste water.

Drawbacks

  • Requires larger amounts of water than other types of irrigation – only suitable in wetter climates.
  • Is considered more labour intensive as land must be closely managed, and prepared.
  • Land must be level, or manually/mechanically levelled.
  • Cannot effectively operate in sandy soils.
  • Very clay-heavy soil can easily become water-logged.
  • If not managed properly, can be very wasteful with respect to water.

Use of Organic/Chemical Control of Pests

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Locally/home-made organic pest control involves the use of home-made remedies to kill and control pests naturally without harming the crop or the environment. Some of the natural pesticides that farmers can use includes soap water, neem, chilli, vegetable oil spray and garlic. These natural remedies are cheaper than the use of chemicals but should be applied in specific amounts for them to be effective. The field must be kept clean to avoid weeds, which provide habitats for insects and weaker crops that are infected must be removed and disposed of away from the field area to avoid attracting further infestations. It is important to minimise disturbance of soil through digging or tilling if not necessary as this can introduce pests into the soil. Alternative approaches such as intercropping, crop rotation, and push/pull systems can also contribute to preventing the spread of pests. This is a climate smart option as it reduces the contribution of pesticides/insecticides to greenhouse gas emissions, and supports sustainable agricultural productivity. If organic insecticides are not effectively killing insects at the rate the farmer wants/needs, chemical controls can be used to halt pest infestation and avoid complete crop loss. However, chemical control of pests should always be the last resort, as chemical pesticides while often hugely effective, are expensive and must be applied precisely to be effective. Furthermore, if used inaccurately chemical pesticides can contaminate crops and the environment, and can impact the farmers’ health. The use of chemicals destroys natural pest enemies and can lead to pest invasion and resistance to pesticides in future, driving continued reliance on chemicals. For example, ants can be a very effective biological control agent against Fall Armyworm (FAW); however, ant populations will also be affected by pesticides.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage chemical use of organic control measures:

  • Organic pesticides must be made based on the type of pests that attack the field along with their productivity rate.
  • Equipment needed. Small measures (teaspoons or baking measures), plastic cup, plastic bucket (>1 litre), stirring rod or large spoon/spatula. Spray bottles or back-pack pump spray. Tools used in the field must be cleaned properly to avoid attracting other pests
  • When spraying, wear goggles, gloves and disposable masks, and avoid spraying on windy or rainy days.
  • It is recommended that any spray is tested before large-scale application. Spray and leave for 24 hours to see if treatment is effective.

a. Basic neem oil spray insecticide: effective against aphids, whiteflies, snails, nematodes, mealybugs, cabbage worms,  gnats, moths, cockroaches, flies, termites, mosquitoes, and scale.

  • Step 1: Mix 1 cup of vegetable oil with 1 tablespoon of liquid soap in a plastic beaker or cup (cover and shake thoroughly),
  • Step 2: When ready to apply, mix oil spray mix with 1 litre of water,
  • Step 3: Pour spray mix into a spray bottles or a back-pack pump spray,
  • Step 4: Shake thoroughly, and spray directly on the surfaces of affected plants. The oil coats the bodies of the insects, effectively suffocating them, as it blocks the pores through which they breathe.
    - Use mixture within eight-hours.

b. Garlic spray: a general organic insecticide that kills most insects.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Use of organic pesticides/insecticides avoids the use of chemical compounds that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.
Increase Resilience
These can be effective tools to combat insect infestations as climates change.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective control of insect pests can help maintain crop production and avoid crop losses.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_63_ChemcialUseofOrganicControl_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The use of organic insecticides promotes biodiversity as it does not kill pest enemies unlike when using chemicals.
  • Healthy soil is required by applying compost and manure in order to not attract pests.
  • When handling chemicals, health precaution must be in place such as wearing gloves and nose masks to avoid contamination.

Drawbacks

  • The natural remedies are cheaper than chemical control, but they do not kill pests as fast as chemicals.
  • Inappropriate use of pesticides can be harmful to both farmers and food therefore, pesticide application guidelines must be followed to ensure efficiency.

Weeding by Hand/Hoe

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A weed plant is an unwanted plant that grows among and competes with crops for water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space. The removal of such plants from fields – known as ‘weeding’ - is vital to enhancing crop growth. They can be removed by cutting their roots either by hand or using an implement such as a hoe. Some cereal crops like rice and maize attract weeds that are herbicide resistant; hence, the use of a hoe in removing the weeds is the most effective practice. However, as mechanic weeding can result in release of weed seeds into the soils as the hoe makes contact with the plant, weeding by-hand is the best way for weed removal to prevent weed seeds from falling onto the ground for further germination; this can increase the labour intensity of weeding considerably. This is a climate smart practice as it mitigates the emission of greenhouse gases from herbicides into the atmosphere, land and water systems. Furthermore, weeding helps maintain sustainable agricultural productivity, when considered an integral part of farm management and operations. However, weeding has been identified as one of the largest labour inputs for subsistence agriculture, accounting for between 30 and 50 % of on-farm labour requirements.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  mechanical weeding:

  • Step 1: Farmers should be able to identify weeds resistance to herbicides.
  • Step 2: Examine fields to understand level of weed infestation – can they be easily and effectively removed using a hoe, without spreading seeds, or will manual weeding be necessary.
  • Step 3: Attempt to quantify the amount of labour needed. Can the work be completed by the adults on the farm, or will additional labour be required? Will youths be involved in weeding? Will they miss school?
  • Step 4: Begin removal of weeds, ensuring that weeds are uprooted and removed from the field to avoid regeneration. A hoe must have a long handle to be able to work effectively and the hoe blade must not be too sharp in order to cut weeds without going through crops and spreading seed and cuttings.
  • Step 5: Weeding should take place a minimum of three times over the growing season – one week before planting crops, three weeks after planting (when the crop has two to three leaves), and two months after planting (milk-stage ). The aim is to reduce or eliminate the product of seeds in the weed plants.
  • Step 6: Draft animal-drawn cultivators can reduce labour requirements but should only be used to cultivate soil to a shallow depth, retaining soil structure, but not disturbing soil. Weeds should be collected by hand afterwards. Deeper tilling or turning of the soil with the wrong implement may cause more harm than good.
  • Step 7: Weeding must be sustained year on year to reduce prevalence. It is important to caution farmers that results may not be seen in significant reduction of plants until year-two of a weeding programme.
  • Step 8: Obnoxious weeds – such as Striga, etc – should be burned once pulled, preferably away from the field, in order to eradicate their presence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Weeding by hand is an effective method of controlling weeds, and ensuring maximum productivity.
Increase Resilience
A regular and diligent weeding strategy will maintain productivity in a changing climate.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Mitigates emission of greenhouse gases from release of herbicides into the atmosphere.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_60_WeedingbyHandHoe_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Weeding can reduce competition for crops in terms of water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space, making a crop more productive.
  • Weeding is cheaper than the use of herbicides.
  • Weeding by hand or hoe reduces the use of chemicals however, it is as effective as using herbicides.
  • Some weeds produce noxious gases which can have negative impacts on crop growth.

Drawbacks

  • Some of the cereal crops attract weeds that are resistant to herbicides.
  • Manual and mechanical weeding can be physically demanding and may require additional labour resources for larger fields.
  • Manual weeding requires approximately 25 % more labour than using herbicides.

Short Term Reactive Practices

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Short-term reactive practices are control options for pests and diseases once they have reached a level where the economic losses are likely to be greater than the cost of controlling the pest/disease outbreaks and can be used to maintain or increase production. Pests and diseases are better detected at an earlier stage to make it easier to act and prevent severe crop losses and prohibit the spread of pests and diseases throughout the whole field, achieved through regular and systematic field inspections. The practice is considered climate smart as it reduces losses, which in-balance lowers greenhouse gas emissions per tonne of crop produced, it retains agricultural productivity through management of pest infestation and/or disease outbreaks, and is applicable as it can assist farmers adjust to changing climate, and the threat of new and changing pest diseases.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  short term reactive practices:

  • Step 1: Inspecting the crop regularly and systematically by walking through the field following an M-shaped pattern will ensure that the farmer does not just look around the edges, but also inspects in the middle of the field.
  • Step 2: Farmers should carefully examine the crops for any signs of pests/diseases. They may be able to identify the presence of pests or disease through observing the following:
    • If the plant is wilted.
    • Are the leaves more yellow than usual?
    • Are the crops smaller than usual?
    • Do the leaves have spots?
    • Have parts of the plan died?
  • Step 3: Once the foreign specie has been identified, the farmer should employ a method to eradicate the issue thoroughly and immediately.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced losses result in lower GHG emissions per tonne produced.
Increase Resilience
Reduces losses due to management of pest/disease outbreaks.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Farmers can make informed decisions resulting in sustainable losses.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_59_ShortTermReactivePractices_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Short term reactive practices eradicate the pest or disease.
  • The aim is to protect the long-term health of the field/herd for the next season or growing period.

Drawbacks

  • Pests and disease can have devastating impacts on both crops and livestock and can persist throughout growing seasons.

Continuous Long Term Proactive Practices

Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cultural pest control practices Are pest control management measures to control pests (insects, diseases, weeds) by manipulation of the environment or implementation of preventive practices including using plants that are resistant to pests, raising the mowing height of pastures to shade out weeds, aerating pastures to reduce compaction and plant stress. Several beneficial cultural practices can meet both demands, helping with pest and disease control and minimizing the use of toxic chemicals. In the insect pest management context, cultural practices may be considered as specific crop production practices that may be implemented either in the initial stages of the organic farm plan but also as a continuous plan to reduce the likelihood of insect pest infestation to a crop and damage. They form part of the Integrated Pest management (IPM) Practices and are based on tactics to disrupt pest infestation of crops by having the crop unavailable to pests in space and time, making the crop unacceptable to pests by interfering with host preference or location, reducing pest survival on the crop by enhancing natural enemies, altering the crop’s susceptibility to pests. The tactics or methods used in IPM include one or a combination of the following: Cultural control (crop rotation, use of locally adapted or pest resistant/tolerant varieties, sanitation, manipulating planting/harvest dates to avoid pests). Cultural pest control or IPM results in reduced pests/diseases and increased yields and is a climate-smart practice as its emphasis of prevention helps to control pests and diseases before they occur;  its continuous long-term practices without use of chemicals encourage healthier and more pest resilient crops and landscapes, encouraging the use of beneficial insects  making it an adaptation benefit. The possibility of prediction and recognition of pest outbreaks enables earlier management consultations and decisions. The reduction in losses results in lower GHG emissions per tonne produced.

Technical Application

To effectively implement continuous long-term use of cultural practices, the following steps, as part of the Integrated Pest Management (IPM)  should be carried out, but before taking any pest control action, IPM first sets an action threshold, a point at which pest populations or environmental conditions indicate that pest control action must be taken:

  • Step 1: Inspection. The cornerstone of an effective IPM program is a schedule of regular inspections. This should be regular to identify any new visitors to your crop.
  • Step 2: Preventive Action: regular inspections reveal vulnerabilities in your pest management program, steps can be taken to address them before they cause a real problem. One of the most effective prevention measures is exclusion, i.e., performing structural maintenance e.g by closing potential entry points revealed during inspection thereby physically keeping pests out and hence reducing the need for chemical control.
  • Step 3: Identification: Different pests have different behaviours. By identifying the problematic species, pests can be eliminated more efficiently and with the least risk of harm to other organisms. Professional pest management always starts with the correct identification of the pest in question.
  • Step 4: Analysis: Once you have properly identified the pest, you need to figure out why the pest is in your facility, e.g. food debris or moisture accumulation that may be attracting it? What about odors, through floors or cracks, etc.
  • Step 5: Treatment Selection: Cultural or IPM stresses the use of non-chemical control methods, such as exclusion or trapping, before chemical options. When other control methods have failed or are inappropriate for the situation, chemicals may be used in least volatile formulations in targeted areas to treat the specific pests- use the right treatments in the right places, and only as much as you need to get the job done.
  • Step 6: Monitoring: Constantly monitoring your facility for pest activity and facility and operational changes can protect against infestation and help eliminate existing ones. Your agricultural extension officer can assist you in technical advice to keep pests away.
  • Step 7: Documentation: Up-to-date pest control documentation is important and could include scope of service, pest activity reports, service reports, corrective action reports, trap layout maps, lists of approved pesticides, pesticide usage reports and applicator licenses
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced incidence of pests and disease results in higher yields.
Increase Resilience
Healthier and more pest resilient farm and landscape. Prediction of pest outbreaks enables earlier management decisions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced losses result in lowering GHG emissions per tonne produced.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_56_ContiniousLongTermProactivePractices_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • This practice increases yield production, improves soil erosion, enhances soil quality and biological diversity.
  • Reduces pollution of soil, water, allows for pollinating insects to thrive, encourages microbe activity in soil formation

Assists with mitigation of GHG emissions.

Drawbacks

  • Consistent management of pest monitoring, pest prevention and agro-ecosystem management.

Vaccination Campaigns

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vaccination is the administration of immunisation injections to animals in order to prevent, control spread of diseases.  Vaccination campaigns involve administration of vaccine doses to a large population over a short period of time. The veterinary services departments or equivalent of respective countries normally gives free vaccinations to the farming community's animals for diseases which are of either economic significance to people's livelihoods or those that maybe of zoonotic importance (communicable to man from animals). These campaigns are usually fully funded by the government, NGOs to reduce disease outbreaks, prevent spread of an outbreak or improve national herd productivity, and are designed to reach as much livestock as possible. In most countries, free vaccinations are offer for the following diseases: Anthrax(-Cattle), Quarter evil or black quarter disease (Cattle), Contagious abortion (Cattle), Rabies (Dogs & Cats), Foot and Mouth Disease(Cattle)_ as per OIE designation in Disease Control Zones.

 For the message to reach farmers, community radios and involvement of traditional leadership can be used to encourage farmers to participate in vaccination campaigns.  This will help to gain trust and confidence from farmers for the campaign to be successful. Vaccination campaigns is a climate smart practice as it ensures a healthy population able to utilize feed efficiently with a reduced population discharge thus reduced GHG emission.

Technical Application

To effectively implement vaccination campaigns:

  • Step 1: Networks that notify farmers about upcoming vaccination campaigns must be established to promote the significance of vaccinating animals across the country. This can be promoted through government bulletins and community radio, utilising extension networks, village level administration, and traditional leadership.
  • Step 2: Vaccination parks for cattle can be set up by veterinary officials to restrain livestock movement that might increase disease spreading.
  • Step 3: Goats and sheep can be vaccinated at their locations where officials will move from one village to another to reach more population.
  • Step 4: Training of personnel is important to ensure that vaccination is carried out before seasonal outbreaks and prevent the spread of disease.
  • Step 5: Commence campaigns one month prior to the season when outbreaks are most common or upon notice of a disease incidence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Livestock population with a potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_55_VaccinationCampaigns_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The objectives of vaccination campaigns are to reduce the number of animals that are affected by disease outbreaks and prevent treatable diseases from reducing national herd population which may affect farm income.
  • Awareness must be established in order to gain farmers trust and involvement for the campaign to be successful.

Drawbacks

  • No 100% guarantee of protection of animals/birds.
  • Postpone vaccination campaigns if an outbreak is in progress.
  • For ring vaccinations upon outbreaks, proper delineation of the perimeter is important.

Resistant Breeds

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Resistant breeds Disease resistance is the reduction of pathogen growth in or in a plant or animal; denoting less disease development in a particular breed than that which is relatively susceptible and is specific to a particular strain of disease or attribute. Breeding resistant breeds  . Resistance” means the animal actively fights infection by various means. Building resistant breeds can be done through selection. Selective breeding, sometimes called artificial selection, where different breeds of animals with desired characteristics or attributes like resistance to. drought, heat, cold, salinity, flood, submergence and pests can be developed by selective breeding and thus able to relatively thrive in some conditions which would otherwise not be able to, e.g. This assists in the reduction of diseases, results in healthier productive animals and reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. These breeds create a potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat or diary, and thus a climate smart attribute since by reducing emissions per unit of production (proportionately less faeces are dropped per unit consumption of feed) as well as contributing to food security.,. In the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region, local breeds are more resistant to many of the pests and diseases and may be the best option for some farmers in the Arid and semi-arid areas of the region.

Technical Application

To effectively implement resistant breeds:

  • Step 1: Breed livestock with increased resistance against pathogens or other environmental stressors (heat stress).
  • Step 2: Select animals of higher general disease resistance (resistance to several diseases) using a heritable indicator such as natural antibodies.
  • Step 3: Keep record of good performing animals; unhealthy or easily prone of weak animals should not be used for mating; males should be castrated leaving best specimen to breed in subsequent seasons.
  • Step 4: Breed or inseminate the selected cows with desired or selected bulls or semen of the desired traits.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease, results in healthier, more productive/efficient animals.
Increase Resilience
Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production, thus less GHG emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_54_ResistantBreeds_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • With resistant breeds, selecting of male breeds is a long-term climate smart adaptation because they are likely the most resistant.
  • Farmers should identify females in heat and isolate them with selected male animals. This results in productivity increase, higher resilience and cost effectiveness.

Drawbacks

  • Breeding should be controlled to achieve best practice results and farmers should be able to detect when female animals are on heat.
  • Parental performance records should be kept at all times.

Species Diversification

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Species diversification involves a shift from a single species of livestock to more species in an attempt to manage risk and explore more resilient livestock farming options. Species diversification can be introduced in response to changes in local environment/climate conditions, including increasing temperatures, unreliable sources of water and availability of pasture, etc. The aim of this approach is to explore the introduction of species that may be more viable and adaptable in changing local conditions thus improving production levels by keeping animals that will be productive under harsh weather conditions and sustain the quality of the produce. Diversification as a climate smart practice assists farmers with utilising available resources more effectively, e.g. mixing grazers and browsers. Species that react well to changing climatic conditions may cause a shift of demand from grazers to browsers. This practice mitigates disease control, can improve soil fertility and increase water management. Government policies can also influence farmers in diversifying their species with many countries dedicating agricultural research and extension to explore the introduction of different species (e.g. cattle to goats) to assist farmers. It is important that species that are introduced do not have an adverse impact on local fauna or the surrounding environment.

Technical Application

To effectively implement species diversification:

  • Step 1: Research possible species of livestock that may be productive in the climate of the surrounding area and compatible with existing livestock.
  • Step 2: Communicate with national agricultural extension/neighbouring farmers and research to gain an understanding of which breeds have been identified as having potential locally and which are available in the region. Other farmers in the area may have information and experiences to share.
  • Step 3: Inform neighbouring farmers of the potential species that they may be interested in including into their farming system.
  • Step 4: Outline the positive and possible negative aspects of incorporating different species into their system.
  • Step 5: Identify how farmers can access different species and whether they are available at local markets or if these species need to be imported from other areas of the country/region.
  • Step 6: Monitor introduced species to ensure that impacts – positive and negative – are understood.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Utilises available resources more effectively to maintain agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
Diversification can be an adaptation strategy, identifying species with beneficial traits under changing climate conditions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_52_SpeciesDiversification_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Species diversity can assist farmers become more climate resilient by adjusting livestock holdings more adaptable species (camels, goats, etc) as other species can survive on less water and lower feed demands.
  • Diversification may have significant impacts on household food security, income and be more productive.
  • Different species may have traits that are more adaptable to harsh conditions including temperature increases, resistance to disease, drought tolerant, allowing more sustainable productivity (continue to produce milk, eggs meat etc.) and staying in line with market demands during harsher conditions.

Drawbacks

  • Introduction of exotic species can have negative impacts and may push traditional breeds out or have adverse effects on local fodder, water sources etc. if not managed correctly.

Alternative Breeds

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

The Alternative breeds approach involves substitution of breeds, introducing a new (alternative) breed with a current breed to potentially increase production levels in a farm. Breed substitution involves genetic improvement of cattle and goats especially in dairy farming and meat production. Alternative breeds are introduced in order to ascertain competition between breeds based on health, fertility, performance, profits and management requirements. The substitution breeds are picked because there some traits that may be lacking in current breeds at the farm. For example, some farmers in Malawi who have introduced the Black Australop breed of chicken, either by crossbreeding with local chickens or replacing the local chicken altogether. This breed produces much more meat and lays more eggs, which increases farm production and income. This is a climate smart option as it introduces breeds that may require less water or can manage with lower quality feed – thereby reducing costs, and risks.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage alternative breeds:

  • Step 1: Consult with national agricultural research and extension services to identify adaptable breeds available in the country/region, noting type of traits suitable for the particular ecological zone, and how to access stock. Traits to focus-on include health, milk production, disease tolerance, fertility, economic performance and adaptation to climate change and climate variability. Assisting with sourcing potential alternative breeds is a key role for Extension Officers.
  • Step 2: Before selecting a substitution breed, the current breed must be evaluated to identify traits that are lacking, as well as compatibility. This will help in identifying traits that need to be improved.
  • Step 3: Determine the cost effectiveness of the new breed to the area and or farmer, in terms of feed conversion rates, disease resistance, environmental conservation etc.
  • Step 4: Consistently keep record of the livestock performance and behaviour for discussion with other farmers and extension officers.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Switching to alternative breeds can increase productivity in meat, milk and egg production.
Increase Resilience
Changing to alternative breeds can form part of a successful adaptation strategy as climates change.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_51_AlternativeBreeds_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Alternative breeds are used to improve the genetic qualities of livestock.
  • This agricultural practice improves biological diversity, ensures food security, increases farm income and most importantly reduces risk as cross breeds in future will be more resilient to climatic variations.

Drawbacks

  • Requires research to identify suitable breeds.
  • Livestock will require frequent monitoring to ensure cross-breeding is yielding required results.
  • Replacement breeds should also be monitored to ensure they are adjusting to the local conditions.

Cut and Carry

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cut and carry is the agricultural practice of cutting and carrying fodder crops away from the field that they are grown in to feed to livestock. Fodder trees, shrubs or grasses are sources for livestock feed in this practice. Cut and Carry is a key CSA practice where overgrazing is a problem. This practice takes pressure off grazing land at critical periods, reduces land degradation caused by livestock and increases soil organic matter, while still feeding livestock for productive outcomes. This practice can also be used in more intensive livestock production where livestock are kept housed for periods stretching from half a year to a year and improved nutrition is required. However, fodder production can be costly in terms of cultivation, requiring significant management over and above the livestock themselves. Fodder is collected from sites where it grows naturally, or it can be grown in fodder banks, hedges, boundaries, etc. Feeding livestock using this approach can ensure the supply of a large quantity of high quality and palatable fodder within a short time, as well ensuring soil is not disturbed through open grazing systems, thus a good CSA practice. It can be adapted to the farmer’s needs and can provide a way of introducing the farmer to the concept of improving livestock at the same time as conserving soil.

Technical Application

To effectively implement cut and carry systems:

  • Step 1: Cut and carry commences with the cutting of the crop.
  • Step 2: Cut crop when plants are fully mature (vegetative growth and plant sugars are at their peak). This ensures that protein, digestible energy and dry matter percentage are at their highest potential.
  • Step 3: Fodder can be fed directly or dried as hay or preserved as silage to conserve its value and be fed to livestock during the dry season or other critical times throughout the year.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Fodder can be harvested on multiple occasions during times of plenty and preserved for later, rather than leaving as standing hay.
Increase Resilience
Reduces pressure of grazing by limiting period livestock tread on land causing denudation at critical periods (with less cover).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_46_CutAndCarry_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Improves fodder production and farm income.
  • Growing fodder crops in rainy seasons encourages fodder conservation for dry season feeding.
  • Can be combined with crop rotation and intercropping to form part of positive farm management practices.
  • Cut and carry can relieve pressure from pasture and grazing land, contributing to control of over-grazing, while improving soil quality.
  • Can create job opportunities and income generation for youth farmers.

Drawbacks

  • The practice will require additional labour resources.
  • Can be costly in terms of management.
  • Farmers must have enough land to grow fodder on or have access to communal land.
  • Soil condition in the fodder fields must be carefully monitored to ensure that soil nutrients aren’t depleting.
  • Fodder storage must be monitored to ensure bacteria and mould do not affect the quality of feed.
Subscribe to High Outside

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported