Skip to main content

Subsurface Fertilisation

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Subsurface fertilisation is the agricultural practice of placing compressed balls of fertiliser, known as briquettes, deep in the soil. The balls of fertiliser are known to gradually release nitrogen, feeding the crops with the desired nutrients. This practice is usually carried out in flooded fields and although originally used for urea application in irrigated rice, it can be used with other fertilisers and crop types. Sub-surface fertilisation prevents the loss of nitrogen during floods as the application is placed 7-10 cm deep in the soil, converted to ammonium, which is much less mobile than nitrates. Only about 4% of nitrogen is lost to the environment when applying in the sub-surface, as compared to 35% when nitrogen is applied using the broadcasting application practice. Urea briquettes are small (~2 cm diameter), and home-made manure briquettes – more practical and applicable for crops other than rice – are larger – up to 10 cm in diameter.

This fertiliser application technique is considered climate smart as it maximises fertiliser inputs, increasing productivity and providing a mechanism for adapting to climate change by amending soil properties to remain productive.

Technical Application

To effectively implement subsurface fertilisation, the following should be carried out. Use of briquette machines to produce 1 to 3 grams of briquettes that are larger than conventional fertiliser granules is recommended:

  • Step 1: Prior to application, dig small holes 7 to 10 centimetres deep along planting rows in drained rice paddy or regular field, ideally located in the centre between a location where four plants will be planted.
  • Step 2: Place the briquettes in the whole, below the soil surface, and cover with dug soil.
  • Step 3: Crops should be planted within seven days of fertiliser application.

Following are the main steps for making your own briquettes. Making briquettes leading up to planting is more effective, as they are not stored for too long. A standard briquette machine can be purchased for between USD 3,000 and USD 6,000.

  • Step 1: Collect manure from cow and/or horse waste.
  • Step 2: Allow the manure to moderately dry (so it is possible to handle), but not for extensive periods, otherwise it will degrade. Keep manure out of direct sunlight, or when processing, remove the outer layer before manufacturing briquettes, and do not leave exposed, especially during rainy periods.
  • Step 3: Press manure into briquettes using briquette press machine – see directions below to make your own home-press.
  • Step 4: Allow the briquettes to dry in a cool, dry location, and store for later use.

To make your own large manure briquette press using household items, follow the instructions below:

  • Step 1: Cut the top off a straight-sided 2-litre plastic soft drink bottle at the top of straight side.
  • Step 2: Obtain a tinned food can that is just smaller than the diameter of the bottle. Preferably leave tin un-opened.
  • Step 3: Line the bottle with a plastic bag.
  • Step 4: Place slightly damp manure (cow, horse or both) inside the bag, inside the bottle, filling the space.
  • Step 5: Place tin on top of manure.
  • Step 6: Place small plank of wood on top of the tin.
  • Step 7: Place your foot on top of the piece of wood, and slowly apply pressure to the tin, pressing the manure down, adding more manure if it compresses further than the depth of the tin.
  • Step 8: When the manure will compress no more, remove plank and tin, and draw the compressed manure from the bottle, removing the plastic bag to reveal a cylinder of compressed manure.
  • Step 9: Slice with a sharp knife to discs 2 to 3 cm thick, and use a piece of 2 cm diameter metal or plastic pipe to punch a hole through each disc. Reuse the
  • Step 10: Allow to air dry as individual rings in a cool dry place. As soon as they are strong enough, you can hang the rings on wire to continue to dry. Use in fields within a month of manufacture. The ring increases surface area, and speeds-up the drying process.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
A highly effective soil amendment that increases nutrients and organic matter in soil, and in turn productivity.
Increase Resilience
An effective mechanism for amending soil in the face of changing climates.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
If using fertiliser to amend soil, this approach retains substantially more of the fertiliser in the soil to augment nutrients; therefore, is more efficient.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_67_SubsurfaceFertilisation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • This application preserves the nutrients deep in the soil and nourishes the soil making nitrogen available to the crops throughout their growth cycle.
  • Maximises fertiliser application, as little is lost to the atmosphere.
  • Farm waste such as manure can be repurposed into briquettes for subsurface fertiliser application.
  • Can provide a revenue generation opportunity for enterprising community members.

Drawbacks

  • Requires additional labour to gather material, and to make briquettes.
  • There is a financial commitment for purchasing briquette-making equipment.
  • Briquettes can be made by hand, but it requires additional labour and time.

Banding and Micro Dosing

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

While rotating crops or leaving fields fallow for several growing seasons is good practice, some farmers do not have this luxury, needing to continue planting season upon season. However, this practice will soon see soils depleted of nutrients. In these cases, use of green manure, and organic fertilisers is recommended. In. the last-resort cases where chemical fertilisers must be used, banding and micro-dosing are approaches that rationalise or minimise application. Banding is the agricultural practice of placing fertiliser in a row below soil surface, covering with soil and planting seeds above the fertiliser, whereas Micro-dosing – sometimes referred to as ring-placement - is the practice of placing small, more affordable amounts of fertiliser around each crop plant. Banding is a common method used for basal fertiliser applications and uses less fertiliser than broadcasting as it is applied in rows rather than throughout the whole field. Micro-dosing is applicable where plants are widely spaced and where soil increases the chances of nutrient loss due to leaching. While the use of chemical fertilisers is not strictly considered climate smart, these practices promote economic and rationalised application of fertilisers, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, whilst improving resilience in the face of climate change, and providing options for maintain agricultural productivity.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage banding and micro-dosing for maize and sorghum, the following should be carried out. When handling fertilisers, always ensure that safety precautions provided on the packaging are followed.

Banding – suitable when wishing to save on fertiliser expenditure, but still need to improve production of primary and secondary crops.

  • Step 1: Plough the field using a draught animal-drawn or mechanised plough to carefully open furrows. Depending on availability of mechanised equipment, a narrow hoe can also be used if manual labour is favoured. This can reduce workload and minimise soil disturbance but may require more effort.
  • Step 2: Count furrows and measure length to ensure that you have sufficient fertiliser for area, based on recommended application amounts (see packaging or see advice from supplier).
  • Step 3: Apply fertilisers as a strip or line (band) along the furrow.
  • Step 4: Turn furrow back over ensuring that the fertiliser is present at a depth of 5-8cm below the soil surface and covered by the soil. The basal fertiliser should not touch the seed as it may burn it and disturb its germination.

Micro-dosing: suitable when fertiliser is in short supply.

  • Step 1: in the field, at the time of planting, prepare small pits 5 to 8 cm deep where each seed is to be placed.
  • Step 2: measure approximately 6 grams of fertiliser using a bottle cap or a three-finger pinch.
  • Step 3: place the micro-dose in the small pits.
  • Step 4: cover fertiliser with a small amount of soil, then place the seed. Cover fully with soil and water, or allow rain to wet the ground.
  • Where manure is available, Zai pits can be used to improve organic matter at the same time. Prior to planting, dig the small pit and fill with manure. When rains begin, fertiliser and seed are placed in the hole and covered.
  • The practice includes the advantage of banding by placing the fertiliser below the seed but at a single point instead of a row.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
While seen as a last resort, these focused applications of chemical fertilisers can lead to sustained agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
In some areas, use of fertilisers is unavoidable, especially in areas impacted by climate change.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
These economical uses of fertiliser minimise or rationalise fertilisers, reduce contributions to GHG emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_66_BandingAndMicroDosing_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Banding is the most commonly used method for basal fertiliser applications, and it uses much less fertiliser as it is applied in rows.
  • Micro-Dosing maintains and increases crop production with less fertiliser, crops become less susceptible to diseases/pests and reduces GHG emissions per kg of crop produce.
  • Micro-dosing has been known to double or even triple yields and plant biomass.
  • If using fertiliser, these approaches can save significantly on the cost of fertilisers, as is
  • Can be used to supplement organic fertilisers if in short supply.
  • Both techniques are more economic for smallholders.

Drawbacks

  • Use of chemical fertilisers has a cost attached.
  • Chemical fertilisers are not strictly a CSA approach.
  • Requires a sustainable supply of fertilisers.
  • If small-holders are purchasing fertilisers, they are often only available in 50 kg bags, which often make them economically inaccessible. Agriculture for development projects have been lobbying manufacturers to also provider smaller bags.
  • If 50 kg bags are purchased, fertiliser must be stored in cool dry place – following instructions on packaging.
  • Micro-dosing can be very time and labour intensive.

Biological Control of Pests

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

The use of chemical insecticides and pesticides can be expensive and therefore not an economically viable option for small scale farmers, while also not being climate smart – widespread use of pesticides and herbicides contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Encouraging natural predators can be an effective method for controlling and managing pests in some instances. With governments across the globe discouraging the use of chemical insecticides and pesticide products, biological control of pests is preferred and encouraged - using living organisms to control pests. Natural predators are insects that feed on pests without damaging the crop and can be found throughout the crops. Encouraging natural predators helps in supressing pests during their early and late lifecycles, improving crop production and reducing pollution caused by pesticides use. The introduction of water-fowl, such ducks in rice systems can be a highly effective form of biological control of pests. They enjoy aquatic habitats, consume insects and can even contribute to weeding as tear up weed plants as they look for food. Insect predators have different roles in controlling pests, there are predators that will control pests in the early pest lifecycle where they feed on their larvae and eggs while some are present at the late pest cycle where they feed on mature insects. Some species of ants are natural predators of stemborer pests, and wasp and some fly species larvae are parasitoids (larvae that feed on a host organism) prey on fall armyworm. One such wasp is the tiny (3 mm in length) Cotesia marginiventris which feeds on FAW caterpillars. The minute (0.5 mm in length) Trichogramma was species lays it’s eggs inside FAW eggs, killing the FAW larvae in the process. Earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae, Carcinophoridae), ground beetles and ladybird beetles are also known to prey on FAW caterpillars. The issue with many of these solutions is volume of consumption, which may be too low to impact an infestation. Ants are the most important predators of FAW, as the communities consume larger quantities of FAW. However, pesticides drastically impact ant populations.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage biological control and encourage natural predators:

  • Step 1: Conduct regular monitoring using field walk-throughs and utilise bottle traps with various lures/baits to identify main pests on crops in order to identify any pests.
  • Step 2: Once the pests have been identified, consult with national research institutes to identify the best natural predators, or biological control agents* to address the particular pests. It is critical to understand what options are available and costs associated with each option.
  • Step 3: Implement according to advice received.
  • Step 4: Monitor progress in terms of reduction in numbers and incidences.
  • Step 5: Adjust the approach based upon observations from the fields.

A farmer must study the lifecycles of insect predators and be aware of pests that feed on his/her crops in order to identify the intervention that will the most effective in controlling pests at difference phases of their lifecycles. Farmers can create welcoming environments for certain predators to attract them to the field area

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reducing pests of all kinds can reduce crop and harvest losses.
Increase Resilience
As climate changes, pests and insects will also change. Bottle traps will help.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_62_BiologicalControlOfPests_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Encouraging natural predators helps improve crop production, reduces the use of pesticides which can pollute both the crop and environment.
  • Introducing a natural predator, or biological control agent can reduce the risk of crop failure, and increase agricultural productivity.
  • Archytas, Winthemia and Lespesia flies prey on FAW eggs, with the fly-maggots feeding on the FAW larvae in order to grow. And ants can be highly effective predators of FAW.
  • Ducks are highly effective in rice paddy fields.

Drawbacks

  • Natural predators are often highly specific to a certain predator, and location/geography/climate; hence, research must be done to establish the most effective method of control.
  • Some natural predators do not consume enough prey to reduce infestations, meaning despite best efforts, crops may still fail.

Mechanical Bottle Traps

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Bottle traps are an agricultural technology used to lure insects inside containers (bottles) containing bait of either food or chemical attractants. The objective is to lure pest insects to identify them for pest control, as part of overall pest monitoring, including field walks, observation and crop inspections. In larger fields they are used solely for pest identification. In smaller fields a number of traps can be used as a pest control method, trapping the insects, but this is not a common approach. Bottle traps must be installed in locations close to or amongst crops and across the farm in order to attract insects for identification and should be used throughout all cropping season to ensure that pests can be identified earlier. As a component of Integrated Pest Management, bottle traps with different lures or baits can be used to attract and identify most types of aphids and mites, fruit flies, stem borers, and fall army worm. While many of the lures and baits can be made at home or on the farm, pheromone-based baits need to be purchased from agricultural suppliers. While this introduces costs, bottle traps and lures can contribute significantly pest management, through early identification so appropriate action can be taken. This technology can contribute to climate smart agriculture objectives, as bottle traps and lures can reduce the amount of pesticides used, reducing greenhouse gas emissions; they can help with identifying new pests and insects as climates shift; and as pests are identified or reduced, productivity can increase. It is important for farmers and workers to keep records of pests identified to ensure that appropriate responses are enacted. There could be cases where infestation levels are low and the cost of taking action may be more that nominal crop losses. However, the opposite may be true, but decisions cannot be made without relevant information for extension workers to discuss with farmers.

Technical Application

To effectively use mechanical bottle traps, the following should be carried out:

Bottle-trap

  • Step 1: Obtain 2L plastic water or soft-drink bottles.
  • Step 2: Rinse bottles thoroughly to avoid contents affecting lure.
  • Step 3: Cut bottle horizontally using sharp scissors or knife, ensure that the top-half is slightly shorter than lower-half.
  • Step 4: Turn the shorter top-half upside down and insert into lower-half ensuring the top- half does not touch the lower surface of the bottom-half.
  • Step 5: Poke holes in both sides, penetrating both layers (top and bottom halves) and insert string, cord, or wire to create a handle.
  • Step 6: Hang on tree branches or on thick wire or wooden stands around field perimeter and in larger fields within fields.

Specially designed all army worm traps can be purchased at agricultural suppliers. Farmers may also need a magnifying glass to identify insects.

Lures or bait

  • Step 1: Identify the types of insect or pest you wish to lure, to ensure the correct mix.
    • For fall army worms, use a pheromone lure – which should be purchased from an agricultural supplier.
    • For maize stalk/stem-borers, again pheromone bait is the most effective.
    • Flies are attracted by sugar-based solutions, or protein (meat) based for carrion flies.
    • Fruit flies are attracted by ripe-fruit, cider vinegar, beer and wine.
  • Step 2: Place 2 to 4 cm of lure at the bottom of the lower half of the bottle, depending on size of the bottle – the larger the bottle, the more lure. Ensure that the lure smell must be strong, but not too intense so that it attracts insects rather than chasing them away.
  • Step 3: Use only one lure per bottle trap as more than one might cause contamination leading to ineffective attractants.
  • Step 4: Clearly mark bottles indicating the type of lure in use – permanent marker pen.

Use of disposable gloves is advisable when handling lures.

Unopened pheromone lure packets should be kept in a cool, dry places – preferably a refrigerator.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Can lead to reduced usage of pesticides, hence reducing GHG emissions.
Increase Resilience
As climate changes, pests and insects will also change. Bottle traps will help.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The use of bottle traps can be used to identify pests for control, supporting productivity through appropriate pest control.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_61_MechanicalBottleTraps_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Bottle trapping is a cheap and effective method for monitoring insects on a farm and identifying those that may affect productivity and/or lead to significant losses.
  • This technique can be used to identify the insect that are infesting the field and which areas they are more concentrated, providing information for targeted interventions.
  • In smaller fields, or in times of intense infestation, bottle traps themselves can be used to lure and control pests.

Drawbacks

  • Precaution is required when handling chemical-based lures as they can be harmful to humans and animals, and can negatively impact crop yield if used incorrectly.
  • Some lures can only be purchased at agricultural suppliers.
  • Cannot be used operationally to control pests in larger fields.

Weeding by Hand/Hoe

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A weed plant is an unwanted plant that grows among and competes with crops for water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space. The removal of such plants from fields – known as ‘weeding’ - is vital to enhancing crop growth. They can be removed by cutting their roots either by hand or using an implement such as a hoe. Some cereal crops like rice and maize attract weeds that are herbicide resistant; hence, the use of a hoe in removing the weeds is the most effective practice. However, as mechanic weeding can result in release of weed seeds into the soils as the hoe makes contact with the plant, weeding by-hand is the best way for weed removal to prevent weed seeds from falling onto the ground for further germination; this can increase the labour intensity of weeding considerably. This is a climate smart practice as it mitigates the emission of greenhouse gases from herbicides into the atmosphere, land and water systems. Furthermore, weeding helps maintain sustainable agricultural productivity, when considered an integral part of farm management and operations. However, weeding has been identified as one of the largest labour inputs for subsistence agriculture, accounting for between 30 and 50 % of on-farm labour requirements.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  mechanical weeding:

  • Step 1: Farmers should be able to identify weeds resistance to herbicides.
  • Step 2: Examine fields to understand level of weed infestation – can they be easily and effectively removed using a hoe, without spreading seeds, or will manual weeding be necessary.
  • Step 3: Attempt to quantify the amount of labour needed. Can the work be completed by the adults on the farm, or will additional labour be required? Will youths be involved in weeding? Will they miss school?
  • Step 4: Begin removal of weeds, ensuring that weeds are uprooted and removed from the field to avoid regeneration. A hoe must have a long handle to be able to work effectively and the hoe blade must not be too sharp in order to cut weeds without going through crops and spreading seed and cuttings.
  • Step 5: Weeding should take place a minimum of three times over the growing season – one week before planting crops, three weeks after planting (when the crop has two to three leaves), and two months after planting (milk-stage ). The aim is to reduce or eliminate the product of seeds in the weed plants.
  • Step 6: Draft animal-drawn cultivators can reduce labour requirements but should only be used to cultivate soil to a shallow depth, retaining soil structure, but not disturbing soil. Weeds should be collected by hand afterwards. Deeper tilling or turning of the soil with the wrong implement may cause more harm than good.
  • Step 7: Weeding must be sustained year on year to reduce prevalence. It is important to caution farmers that results may not be seen in significant reduction of plants until year-two of a weeding programme.
  • Step 8: Obnoxious weeds – such as Striga, etc – should be burned once pulled, preferably away from the field, in order to eradicate their presence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Weeding by hand is an effective method of controlling weeds, and ensuring maximum productivity.
Increase Resilience
A regular and diligent weeding strategy will maintain productivity in a changing climate.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Mitigates emission of greenhouse gases from release of herbicides into the atmosphere.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_60_WeedingbyHandHoe_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Weeding can reduce competition for crops in terms of water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space, making a crop more productive.
  • Weeding is cheaper than the use of herbicides.
  • Weeding by hand or hoe reduces the use of chemicals however, it is as effective as using herbicides.
  • Some weeds produce noxious gases which can have negative impacts on crop growth.

Drawbacks

  • Some of the cereal crops attract weeds that are resistant to herbicides.
  • Manual and mechanical weeding can be physically demanding and may require additional labour resources for larger fields.
  • Manual weeding requires approximately 25 % more labour than using herbicides.

Vaccination Campaigns

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vaccination is the administration of immunisation injections to animals in order to prevent, control spread of diseases.  Vaccination campaigns involve administration of vaccine doses to a large population over a short period of time. The veterinary services departments or equivalent of respective countries normally gives free vaccinations to the farming community's animals for diseases which are of either economic significance to people's livelihoods or those that maybe of zoonotic importance (communicable to man from animals). These campaigns are usually fully funded by the government, NGOs to reduce disease outbreaks, prevent spread of an outbreak or improve national herd productivity, and are designed to reach as much livestock as possible. In most countries, free vaccinations are offer for the following diseases: Anthrax(-Cattle), Quarter evil or black quarter disease (Cattle), Contagious abortion (Cattle), Rabies (Dogs & Cats), Foot and Mouth Disease(Cattle)_ as per OIE designation in Disease Control Zones.

 For the message to reach farmers, community radios and involvement of traditional leadership can be used to encourage farmers to participate in vaccination campaigns.  This will help to gain trust and confidence from farmers for the campaign to be successful. Vaccination campaigns is a climate smart practice as it ensures a healthy population able to utilize feed efficiently with a reduced population discharge thus reduced GHG emission.

Technical Application

To effectively implement vaccination campaigns:

  • Step 1: Networks that notify farmers about upcoming vaccination campaigns must be established to promote the significance of vaccinating animals across the country. This can be promoted through government bulletins and community radio, utilising extension networks, village level administration, and traditional leadership.
  • Step 2: Vaccination parks for cattle can be set up by veterinary officials to restrain livestock movement that might increase disease spreading.
  • Step 3: Goats and sheep can be vaccinated at their locations where officials will move from one village to another to reach more population.
  • Step 4: Training of personnel is important to ensure that vaccination is carried out before seasonal outbreaks and prevent the spread of disease.
  • Step 5: Commence campaigns one month prior to the season when outbreaks are most common or upon notice of a disease incidence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Livestock population with a potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_55_VaccinationCampaigns_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The objectives of vaccination campaigns are to reduce the number of animals that are affected by disease outbreaks and prevent treatable diseases from reducing national herd population which may affect farm income.
  • Awareness must be established in order to gain farmers trust and involvement for the campaign to be successful.

Drawbacks

  • No 100% guarantee of protection of animals/birds.
  • Postpone vaccination campaigns if an outbreak is in progress.
  • For ring vaccinations upon outbreaks, proper delineation of the perimeter is important.

Biological Control Vectors

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vectors are organisms that carry diseases from one living being to another without showing symptoms of the diseases themselves. Some of the most common forms of vectors are blood sucking insects such as mosquitos, fleas, lice, ticks and other similar insects, and rats/rodents. Places such as stagnant water and dumping sites can be ideal habitats for vectors to reside and transmit. The use of natural vector predators can help reduce or eliminate vector populations. The most common vectors in southern Africa are insects (tsetse flies-trypanosomiasis), animals (foot and mouth disease through cattle or people with contaminated shoes), tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF).  Sanitising the life-cycle of vectors, implementing pest traps and introducing pest predators are means of reducing the spread of disease. The impacts of climate change, especially increased heavy rainfall and higher temperatures can encourage vector populations to grow quicker than normal. Simple strategies to control vectors includes keeping livestock surroundings clean, avoiding livestock access to stagnant water, fencing areas off, restricting animal access to certain locations, can all control biological vectors and assist in reducing vector spread.

Technical Application

To effectively implement biological control vectors:

  • Step 1: Research common vectors in the local area and ensure that farmers are informed about the kinds, description, lifecycle and common habitats of these vectors, such as tsetse flies, ticks, biting flies.
  • Step 2: Avoid allowing livestock access to dirty and damp environments as well as very bushy areas as these locations are common habitats for vectors.
  • Step 3: Use of traps or even introduction of vector predators to livestock to manage vector spread could be used. This could include introducing epsilon traps for tsetse flies to promote vector control.
  • Step 4: If rodents are found in or around livestock, introduce rodent control methods such as traps and/or rodent predators (cats, etc) and bury any remains far from livestock areas.
  • Step 5: Fence off areas of high vector prevalence, such as stagnant water, ensuring that livestock do not access these areas.
  • Step 6: Examine any rangeland to determine whether there are vectors in the vicinity such as biting insect, or locusts that may damage maize crops and fruit flies that damage tomatoes.
  • Step 7: Community radio can be an effective method for extension officers to inform communities about outbreaks, or impending infestations.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_53_BiologicalControlVectors_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Identifying the common vectors in the area is a key first step to understanding how to manage them.
  • Using vector traps and introducing vector predators can also help manage livestock exposure.

Drawbacks

  • Biological vectors transport disease that can have devastating impacts on livestock.

Manure Collection, Storage and Treatment

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Manure is organic matter that is used as an organic fertiliser in agricultural practices, conditioning and adding nutrients to soil, generally derived from animal faeces. Manure is the best source of fertiliser available to a farmer, as it can be readily available from livestock, and it a more environmentally friendly option over synthetic fertilisers. Animal manure, compost and green manure are the three different types of manure used in soil management. Manure is collected in different forms: liquid manure, slurry manure or solid manure, and treated in different systems depending on its state. Liquid and slurry manure are stored in liquid (slurry) manure storage systems whereas solid manure is stored in sacks in order to allow air and toxic vapours to move in and out, as well as to maintain the moisture content. The manure is collected and treated (as described below) in order to kill pests that may feed on crops during the application period. The manure is further cleaned to remove unwanted substances such as sticks, and large lumps formed in the manure.

Technical Application

To effectively implement manure collection, storage and treatment:

  • Step 1: Use gloves before handling animal manure from any livestock.
  • Step 2: Use shovels and wheel barrows to load and transport the material.
  • Step 3: Store manure in a contained area, with a solid bottom (cement pad) to prevent runoff and leaching into local waterbodies or groundwater.
  • Step 4:  Mix all types of manure with organic substances such as vegetable waste, garden debris, dead leaves, sawdust, wood ash, hay and straw etc. to add structure and other organic compounds to the soil.
  • Step 5: Turn mixed manure over regularly to allow for combining of nutrients and further aeration.
  • Step 6: Cut-up large particles of animal manure to no more than 10 cm in size.
  • Step 7: Spread manure evenly on field a few weeks prior to planting or during planting. It can also be applied in micro-doses around crops and trees directly.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Organic matter in manure can be used to fertilise crops, improving soil health and productivity.
Increase Resilience
Manure collection and management can contribute to crop production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_48_ManureCollectionStorageAndTreatment_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The use of manure helps to maintain the organic-matter content of the soil, which can improve soil structure, increases nutrient availability and crop productivity.
  • An additional benefit is that it increases soil carbon and reduces atmospheric carbon levels.
  • Manure application can be spread across fields or in micro-doses.

Drawbacks

  • Manure leachate can carry concentrated ammonia and other potentially harmful organic compounds. Therefore, it should be contained in one area to prevent possible negative environmental impacts from runoff.

Cut and Carry

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cut and carry is the agricultural practice of cutting and carrying fodder crops away from the field that they are grown in to feed to livestock. Fodder trees, shrubs or grasses are sources for livestock feed in this practice. Cut and Carry is a key CSA practice where overgrazing is a problem. This practice takes pressure off grazing land at critical periods, reduces land degradation caused by livestock and increases soil organic matter, while still feeding livestock for productive outcomes. This practice can also be used in more intensive livestock production where livestock are kept housed for periods stretching from half a year to a year and improved nutrition is required. However, fodder production can be costly in terms of cultivation, requiring significant management over and above the livestock themselves. Fodder is collected from sites where it grows naturally, or it can be grown in fodder banks, hedges, boundaries, etc. Feeding livestock using this approach can ensure the supply of a large quantity of high quality and palatable fodder within a short time, as well ensuring soil is not disturbed through open grazing systems, thus a good CSA practice. It can be adapted to the farmer’s needs and can provide a way of introducing the farmer to the concept of improving livestock at the same time as conserving soil.

Technical Application

To effectively implement cut and carry systems:

  • Step 1: Cut and carry commences with the cutting of the crop.
  • Step 2: Cut crop when plants are fully mature (vegetative growth and plant sugars are at their peak). This ensures that protein, digestible energy and dry matter percentage are at their highest potential.
  • Step 3: Fodder can be fed directly or dried as hay or preserved as silage to conserve its value and be fed to livestock during the dry season or other critical times throughout the year.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Fodder can be harvested on multiple occasions during times of plenty and preserved for later, rather than leaving as standing hay.
Increase Resilience
Reduces pressure of grazing by limiting period livestock tread on land causing denudation at critical periods (with less cover).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_46_CutAndCarry_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Improves fodder production and farm income.
  • Growing fodder crops in rainy seasons encourages fodder conservation for dry season feeding.
  • Can be combined with crop rotation and intercropping to form part of positive farm management practices.
  • Cut and carry can relieve pressure from pasture and grazing land, contributing to control of over-grazing, while improving soil quality.
  • Can create job opportunities and income generation for youth farmers.

Drawbacks

  • The practice will require additional labour resources.
  • Can be costly in terms of management.
  • Farmers must have enough land to grow fodder on or have access to communal land.
  • Soil condition in the fodder fields must be carefully monitored to ensure that soil nutrients aren’t depleting.
  • Fodder storage must be monitored to ensure bacteria and mould do not affect the quality of feed.

Increased Palatability

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Palatability - referring to plant features or conditions that encourage animals to feed on the plant when given a choice – is important as the ability or willingness of animals to feed on specific forage determines the efficiency of production of animal products. When feed is consumed in larger quantities, depending on its nutritive value, it helps increase milk and/or meat production. Plants with stiff and harsh leaves are generally not palatable to animals, unlike those with softer leaves and grass. The nutritive value of the plant matters when it comes to palatability. Palatability will be determined by the texture, aroma, succulence, hairiness, leaf percentage, sugar content and other factors. Moreover, leaves are more palatable than stems. Palatability of plants can be increased by grazing livestock at the optimal grass growing stage before seed formation, using a High Intensity, Low Frequency (HILF) grazing pattern which allows uniform grazing of pastures and gives an allowance for regrowth and thus overall, uniform soil cover. Addressing palatability is often of greater concern during dry season, when grazing/pasture is less common, and farmers have to rely on stored silage.

Technical Application

Traditional knowledge can also yield positive results in identifying sources of alternative dry season feeds, especially specific types of tree leaves and grasses. In mixed maize and livestock farming system, maize stovers can be utilised for more palatable feed supplements. To effectively improve palatability, the following steps should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Where possible, mix grazing species to include browsers and grazers for uniform pasture use. Mixing livestock will reduce overgrazing on certain plants or plant types, distributing grazing pressure. This is a preventative measure. Over-seeding can be used  to fill in bare patches in fields, improve the density of pasture, establish improved grass varieties and enhance your grass vigour. It’s an easy way to improve an existing old or worn out, diseased or insect prone pasture by planting of grass seed directly into existing pasture, without tearing up the pasture, or the soil.
  • Step 2: Speak to agricultural suppliers as palatability can be improved by enhancing the quality of the feed through addition of feed supplements.
  • Step 3: If using silage from high moisture crops, it may be worth exploring feed flavourants as they mask the odours and flavours of alcohol formed as plant material ferments. Natural flavourants can include garlic, anise and black cumin, but artificial flavours are also available. Ratios for addition to fodder is very low - 0.5 to 1.5 %.
  • Step 4: If using dry grass for feed, chopping and addition of molasses  and other concentrates can improve palatability of drier grasses; however, as it needs to be mixed with urea and water, guidance should be sought in terms of mix-ratios from a veterinarian to ensure that urea intake does not exceed recommended amounts.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increasing palatability of feed increases consumption and as a result, production.
Increase Resilience
Identifying methods for increasing palatability enables farmers to broaden fodder options, which can support adaptation if normal feed stock is affected.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_45_IncreasedPatabilityAcceptability_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Over-sowing increases forage quality and productivity.

Drawbacks

  • Pasture palatability is affected by factors such as taste, smell and starch content.
Subscribe to Low

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported