Skip to main content

Flooding Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Flooding irrigation is a practice where water is pumped or allowed to flow into channels passing between crop rows in areas where farmers have level fields. This flooding system is an effective method of managing weeds and pests, preventing the completion of their lifecycles as they are either drowned or isolated from air and sunlight. This practice is applicable in areas where there are favourable climatic conditions with high rainfall amounts; and is not recommended in arid and semi-arid environments. Flooding is controlled using water pumps in order to reduce waterlogging problems, and fields should not be entirely flooded, with surges of periodic flooding used to distribute water and avoid wastage to run-off, evaporation and creation of anaerobic conditions in the soil. Flood waters can be filtered using a fine mesh to control pests and diseases from spreading to neighbouring fields. Sandy soil is not favourable for flood irrigation as it does not evenly distribute water across the field whereas loam and clay soils distribute water efficiently across the field.

It is considered a climate smart practice because it requires less energy, and can promote crop productivity, whilst controlling weeds and pests.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage flooding irrigation:

  • Step 1: prepare the field, digging parallel furrows and raising beds with the excess soil. Crops are planted in beds, and the irrigation water will flow in the furrows.
  • Step 2: Using a pump or gravity fed water storage, allow water to flow into the field, flooding furrows.
  • Step 3: Insert a fine mesh or introduce a hessian sack at the in-flow point to trap weeds and pests.
  • Step 4: Water release should be moderated so as not to flow too fast and erode beds, and too slow such that it remains trapped at the in-flow point.
  • Step 5: Water release can be more effective if released in surges, taking advantage of infiltration rates and capillary action in soil.
  • Step 6: Observe progress. Avoid leaving soil crusts, which will make water rush over.

A sustainable water source must be identified and a pumping/irrigation system should be used.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Less energy is required to irrigate crops, potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions if generators used for pumping water.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective flood irrigation can increase
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_64_FloodingIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • A flood irrigation system reduces weed growth and acts as preventive measure against spread of pests and diseases.
  • Requires less energy, so reduces costs. Gravity does the work, so less need for pumping.
  • Flood irrigation can work with lower-quality water because the water doesn’t contact with crop leaves, which is usually a concern with waste water.

Drawbacks

  • Requires larger amounts of water than other types of irrigation – only suitable in wetter climates.
  • Is considered more labour intensive as land must be closely managed, and prepared.
  • Land must be level, or manually/mechanically levelled.
  • Cannot effectively operate in sandy soils.
  • Very clay-heavy soil can easily become water-logged.
  • If not managed properly, can be very wasteful with respect to water.

Short Term Reactive Practices

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Short-term reactive practices are control options for pests and diseases once they have reached a level where the economic losses are likely to be greater than the cost of controlling the pest/disease outbreaks and can be used to maintain or increase production. Pests and diseases are better detected at an earlier stage to make it easier to act and prevent severe crop losses and prohibit the spread of pests and diseases throughout the whole field, achieved through regular and systematic field inspections. The practice is considered climate smart as it reduces losses, which in-balance lowers greenhouse gas emissions per tonne of crop produced, it retains agricultural productivity through management of pest infestation and/or disease outbreaks, and is applicable as it can assist farmers adjust to changing climate, and the threat of new and changing pest diseases.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  short term reactive practices:

  • Step 1: Inspecting the crop regularly and systematically by walking through the field following an M-shaped pattern will ensure that the farmer does not just look around the edges, but also inspects in the middle of the field.
  • Step 2: Farmers should carefully examine the crops for any signs of pests/diseases. They may be able to identify the presence of pests or disease through observing the following:
    • If the plant is wilted.
    • Are the leaves more yellow than usual?
    • Are the crops smaller than usual?
    • Do the leaves have spots?
    • Have parts of the plan died?
  • Step 3: Once the foreign specie has been identified, the farmer should employ a method to eradicate the issue thoroughly and immediately.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced losses result in lower GHG emissions per tonne produced.
Increase Resilience
Reduces losses due to management of pest/disease outbreaks.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Farmers can make informed decisions resulting in sustainable losses.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_59_ShortTermReactivePractices_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Short term reactive practices eradicate the pest or disease.
  • The aim is to protect the long-term health of the field/herd for the next season or growing period.

Drawbacks

  • Pests and disease can have devastating impacts on both crops and livestock and can persist throughout growing seasons.

Rotational Grazing

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Rotational grazing is a practice of moving livestock between different units of pasture in regular sequence to allow the recovery and regrowth of pasture plants after grazing. This facilitates management of the nutritional needs of the various types of livestock whilst maintaining pasture productivity. Management of intensive grazing/controlled grazing is a climate smart practice as it results in improved forage harvest, soil fertility, resistance to drought, reduced pasture weeds establishment, reduced wastage of forage and soil compaction.

Rotational grazing can also be combined with cut and carry approaches - when managed correctly; rotational grazing can provide enough forage growth early in the grazing season for producers to harvest feed for later use in some paddocks as rotation continues. Farmers can use temporary fence systems to manage the size of, and access to pastures.

Technical Application

To effectively carry out rotational grazing practices:

  • Step 1: Plan livestock grazing system, based on livestock types, stocking density, pasture crop hardiness and production, rainfall, soils and available alternative pasture fields and space, focusing on the nutritional and forage needs of the animals.
  • Step 2: Use temporary electric fence systems to manage the size of the paddock.
  • Step 3: Move livestock between paddocks every set number of days (two days; one week; one month).
  • Step 4: Assess forage quality and quantity, regulating the acreage of access and control by implementing the electric fence system, which uses electrified fencing to determine which parts of the pasture that the livestock will access.
  • Step 5: Monitoring efficacy of the system, changing rotation periods and extend recovery time for grazed land, if land becomes degraded.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased and more productivity per unit area.
Increase Resilience
Gives land time to recover after grazing and hence, being more resilient to extremes.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Increases vegetation cover and soil organic matter and locks carbon.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_47_RotationallGrazing_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Controlled rotational grazing is an effective conservation practice to apply that improves animal management, increases soil fertility, forage productivity, and reduces soil nutrient depletion and soil erosion.

Drawbacks

  • Appropriate land access is a issue, with farmers requiring substantial land or approval and agreement from the community to operationalise the approach.

Cut and Carry

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cut and carry is the agricultural practice of cutting and carrying fodder crops away from the field that they are grown in to feed to livestock. Fodder trees, shrubs or grasses are sources for livestock feed in this practice. Cut and Carry is a key CSA practice where overgrazing is a problem. This practice takes pressure off grazing land at critical periods, reduces land degradation caused by livestock and increases soil organic matter, while still feeding livestock for productive outcomes. This practice can also be used in more intensive livestock production where livestock are kept housed for periods stretching from half a year to a year and improved nutrition is required. However, fodder production can be costly in terms of cultivation, requiring significant management over and above the livestock themselves. Fodder is collected from sites where it grows naturally, or it can be grown in fodder banks, hedges, boundaries, etc. Feeding livestock using this approach can ensure the supply of a large quantity of high quality and palatable fodder within a short time, as well ensuring soil is not disturbed through open grazing systems, thus a good CSA practice. It can be adapted to the farmer’s needs and can provide a way of introducing the farmer to the concept of improving livestock at the same time as conserving soil.

Technical Application

To effectively implement cut and carry systems:

  • Step 1: Cut and carry commences with the cutting of the crop.
  • Step 2: Cut crop when plants are fully mature (vegetative growth and plant sugars are at their peak). This ensures that protein, digestible energy and dry matter percentage are at their highest potential.
  • Step 3: Fodder can be fed directly or dried as hay or preserved as silage to conserve its value and be fed to livestock during the dry season or other critical times throughout the year.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Fodder can be harvested on multiple occasions during times of plenty and preserved for later, rather than leaving as standing hay.
Increase Resilience
Reduces pressure of grazing by limiting period livestock tread on land causing denudation at critical periods (with less cover).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_46_CutAndCarry_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Improves fodder production and farm income.
  • Growing fodder crops in rainy seasons encourages fodder conservation for dry season feeding.
  • Can be combined with crop rotation and intercropping to form part of positive farm management practices.
  • Cut and carry can relieve pressure from pasture and grazing land, contributing to control of over-grazing, while improving soil quality.
  • Can create job opportunities and income generation for youth farmers.

Drawbacks

  • The practice will require additional labour resources.
  • Can be costly in terms of management.
  • Farmers must have enough land to grow fodder on or have access to communal land.
  • Soil condition in the fodder fields must be carefully monitored to ensure that soil nutrients aren’t depleting.
  • Fodder storage must be monitored to ensure bacteria and mould do not affect the quality of feed.

Fodder

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Fodder is the agricultural term for animal feed. Fodder trees and shrubs play an important role in bridging the gap between livestock feed requirements and the low quality and quantity of feeds available to many farmers. As well as providing feed or acting as a feed supplement for livestock, fodder trees and shrubs supply other benefits, such as firewood and erosion control. Fodder trees are either grown in-situ, from seed, and others are planted in nurseries and then transplanted to the field at the beginning of the rainy season. The transplanting method can be more successful than the direct planting - as high as 34 % better, but with a 24 % increase in cost per plant. Benefits of using fodder trees and shrubs as a dietary supplement include improved growth, health and reproductive capacity, and increased milk and meat production, mostly through increased protean uptake. Fodder trees and shrubs can be planted as living fences, field boundaries and in tree/shrub plantations. Popular species include African acacias, and Atriplex nummularia, Cassia petersiana, C. mopane, D. cineria, F. albida, Julbernadia paniculata, P. reclinata, Piliostigma thonningii, Swartizia madagascariensis and Trema orientalis.

Farmers of all categories can use this climate smart sustainable approach to produce both livestock and field crops to obtain improve benefits, improving nutrition for livestock animals, improving soil health, reducing cost of livestock feeding, and as a result increasing income

Technical Application

To effectively carry out fodder tree-shrub production using a nursery environment – a covered or exposed separate planting area, often close to the farm so saplings can be tended easily - consider the following steps:

  • Step 1: Identify one or more suitable species for fodder production, looking at suitable climatic, soil requirements, nutritional value and palatability, also considering source-plant (for cuttings) or seed availability.
  • Step 2: Take cuttings of up to *1 metre in length from mature trees, cutting at an angle. Cutting should be planted within three days, and if transported, cutting end should be covered in wax or petroleum jelly.
  • Step 3: Cuttings should be planted in 10 to 15 cm of soil either directly where they will grow or shallower in polythene planting cups.
  • Step 4: Fodder crops should be planted as the rainy starts, providing sufficient water and mobilising enough nutrients to assist rapid growth.
  • Step 5: Harvesting is again species specific*, and it is important to determine if drying prior to feeding, affects palatability or nutritional value.
  • Step 6: Harvesting frequency should also be determined independently*as plants mature to ensure sustainable production that does not stunt long-term growth and productivity.
  • Step 7: The farmer should consider how much fodder needs to be consumed immediately, how much dried as hay, and how much chopped and compressed to make silage.

Length of cutting, period prior to transplantation, and harvest quantities vary from species to species. Seek guidance from an agroforestry specialist or farmers that have experience with the process when selecting species, and how specifically to plant, manage and harvest fodder crops. An important element to understand is the volume of tree or shrub-based fodder each animal will require.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Higher meat and/or diary production per unit area of land.
Increase Resilience
Diversification of diet can mitigate the effects of drought on availability of fodder in pasture/ rangeland. Co-benefits in improving soil fertility and reducing erosion.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Woody shrubs and trees lock carbon.
Additional Information
  • Franzel, S., Carsan, S. Lukuyu, B, Sinja, J. Wambugu, C. 2014. Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 6
  • World Agroforestry Centre, 2019. Fodder.
  • Smith, O.B. 1994. Feeding fodder from trees and shrubs: Better Farming Series No. 42. Food and Agriculture organisation of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
  • Karanja G.M. and C.M. Wambugu 2004. Fodder Trees for More Milk and Cash. Ministry of Agriculture (Kenya)/Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Chakeredza, S., Hove, L., Akinnifesi, K.K., Franzel, S., Ajayim, O.C., and Sileshi, G., 2007.Managing fodder trees as a solution to human–livestock food conflicts and their contribution to income generation for smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Natural Resources Forum 31 286–296
  • Steven Franzel, S., Carsan, S., Lukuyu, B., Sinja, J. and Wambugu, C.2012. Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_44_FodderShrubsTrees_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Fodder trees and shrubs can be highly beneficial sources of feed and nutrition for livestock, augmenting, or completely replacing traditional grazing.
  • Can be utilised when over-grazing has occurred, to allow range land to regenerate.
  • Fodder trees and shrubs add vital nutrients to the soil.
  • Fodder trees and shrubs can provide other benefits, including acting as living fences, and wind-breaks, as well as supplying firewood.
  • Crop rotation is important and fodder crops often act as nitrogen fixers (legumes) as well.
  • Fodder crops can also act as cover crops protecting and maintaining soil quality.

Drawbacks

  • Growing fodder can be laborious.
  • The number of fodder trees and shrubs may be extensive, therefore sufficient land is required.
  • Not only does the gathering of fodder require additional labour, but the harvested crop also requires management.

Carrying Capacity Improvement

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Carrying capacity defines the number of Animal Units (AU; head of cattle or number of sheep, goats or other animals) that can graze in a rangeland unit without exhausting the vegetation and soil quality – essentially optimally utilising resources. Optimum carrying capacity is where a given unit of rangeland can support healthy populations of animal species, while allowing an ecosystem to regenerate, thus creating a sustainable balance. The stocking rate - defined as the number of animal species grazing a unit of rangeland for a limited period - must be kept fixed on an average year, meeting the carrying capacity to allow regeneration, the fallen seeds to rejuvenate and the soil to recover. However, stocking rates can fluctuate depending on the nature of the vegetation, rainfall variability, herd composition and management system. If the conditions are not favourable for vegetation growth during drought season, the number of livestock or the grazing period must be adjusted to avoid overgrazing. Moreover, the purpose of livestock keeping, i.e. for milk, meat, or wool production, will determine the carrying capacity of a rangeland unit. Factors such as climatic zone, rainfall dependency, class of livestock (steer, dry cow, calves, lactating cow and bull, etc), health of grassland and animal species affect the stocking rate. While relevant in all climatic zones, it is more applicable in arid and semi-arid zones where rainfall is most scarce. This climate smart practice increases production (meat/dairy), increases pasture resilience to extreme climate hazards (drought) and enhances soil fertility.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Carrying capacity improvement:

  • Step 1: There is no standard equation to determine the carrying capacity of an area, as many variables apply and factors relevant within each context including size of land unit, amount, frequency and timing of rainfall seasons, type of vegetation, species of animal, etc.
  • Step 2: Extension officers should aim to support farmers to continuously monitor rangeland status and realise the impacts of over-grazing and the benefits of finding an equilibrium.
  • Step 3: Constant monitoring of the pasture and animals must be carried out throughout the year to check if stocking rate aligns with the carrying capacity of the land unit. If land degradation is identified, adjustments to stocking rates should be considered, in the context of season and landscape regeneration.
    • For communal grazing land, it is ideal to use Animal Units (AU) to calculate the relative grazing impact of different kinds and classes of domestic livestock and/or even common grazing wildlife species for one month (AUM = Animal Unit Months). This information should support collective decision-making regarding rangeland resources.

        Using a conversion table of, the AUE (Animal Unit Equivalent) and the formula:

        1) multiply the number of animals to be grazed on the pasture by AUE to determine total AU, then

        2) multiply the total AU by the number of months planned to graze (see formula below or

        Worksheet A of the Range Calculator).

        Formula: _____________ x _____________ = _____________ x _____________ = _____________

                        # Animals         AUE(table)     Animal Units (AU)   Months (M)           AUM

  • Step 4: One option for effectively responding to carrying capacity challenges is shift or changing grazing species if high consumption species are placing pressure on a particular unit of land.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Higher meat and/ or dairy production per unit area.
Increase Resilience
Improved pasture (through proper management) allow higher numbers without retrogression, thus more resilient even to drought conditions, erosion, flooding, etc.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Increases soil organic matter and plants-thus locks more carbon (c-sequestration).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_43_CarryingCapacityImprovement_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Identifying, achieving and maintaining optimal carrying capacity helps to avoid rangeland degradation including vegetation depletion and soil erosion, bush encroachment, and optimises resource use.
  • Effectively monitoring carrying capacity can allow communities to respond to climate change impacts, resulting from shifting rainfall patterns and temperature regimes.

Drawbacks

  • Rainfall dependency, class of livestock and quality of grassland affect stocking rate.
  • The stocking rate must be monitored to avoid animal overcrowding, which might cause diseases to spread quickly.
  • It is important to monitor the plant species in your pasture and or rangelands to be able to determine its health and trend.
  • Reseeding should be considered in areas when land is degrading.

System of Rice Intensification (SRI)

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Altitudinal Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is an agro-ecological practice for increasing the productivity of irrigated rice cultivation by changing the management of water, plants, soil and nutrients. SRI promotes the growth of root systems, increases the abundance and diversity of soil organisms by keeping the soil moist but not flooded, and provides frequent aeration and conditioning of soil with organic matter. This agro-ecological practice stimulates plant growth by transplanting young seedlings, avoiding disturbance to roots and providing crops with wider spacing to encourage greater root and canopy growth. The agricultural methodology is based on well-founded agro-ecological principles which have been successfully adapted to upland rice and have shown increased productivity over current conventional planting practices.

Technical Application

To effectively implement SRI practices:

  • Step 1: Consider separation of high-quality seeds from low-quality seeds through soaking them in plain or salt water and the unviable seeds will float on the surface of the water.
  • Step 2: Plant the seeds on an unflooded, raised bed with adequate drainage and fertile soil.
  • Step 3: After 8-12 days, transplant single young seedlings into a grind pattern with wide spacing between hills (25 cm x 25 cm).
  • Step 4: During crop growth period, control the flooding and research and follow alternate wetting and drying irrigation practices.
  • Step 5: Consider application of compost and mineral fertiliser for nutrient enhancement.
  • Step 6: Use a mechanical weeder for the control of weeds and maximisation of soil aeration.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced inputs for greater yield.
Increase Resilience
Predictable yields. Higher production equals increased food security/income and resilience..
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
May reduce GHG emissions from irrigation pumps.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_32_SRI_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increased and diversified crop yield resulting in increased farm income.
  • Improved food security.
  • SRI reduces GHG emissions.
  • Existing water availability patterns to accommodate the irrigation schedule.

Drawbacks

  • SRI is a labour-intensive agricultural practice.
  • Occurrence of methane emissions from rice fields caused by flooding.

Drip Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Drip irrigation is a method of slow delivery of water to crops, through highly-controlled flow management, applied along the soil or at the sub-surface level directly to crop root systems. Drip irrigation is an effective system for conserving water while ensuring that it is used optimally without losing it to evaporation through high efficiency water delivery. Drip irrigation involves establishing a network of tubes, values and pipes connected to water source by a pump, along crop rows. A water source is required which is a drawback as many dryland areas lack these water sources. Drip irrigation is a climate smart option as it increases farmer resilience to the effects of climate change.

Technical Application

To effectively implement drip irrigation:

  • Step 1: A reliable water source must be available - natural (natural or through rain-water harvesting).
  • Step 2: Acquire a pump system (approximately $US 100) that maintains enough pressure to deliver water through the system or an elevated tank.
  • Step 3: Connect lines or hoses and laterals that run from the pump system across the planted fields.
  • Step 4: Run lines or hoses with emitters (drippers) or small punctures at the surface level along planted crops or just below the surface providing water to the roots system of the plants.
  • Step 5: Once the system is operable, the pump can be turned on and water dispersed as required by the nature of the crop and can also be implemented with supplemental irrigation strategies (Technical Brief 23).
  • Step 6: Monitor the irrigation system regularly to ensure there are no malfunctions and the system is maintained. Crops that receive regular water can develop shallow root systems and any prolonged disruptions in service could have   significant impacts.
  • Step 7: If applying drip irrigation in sloped conditions, follow the contours of the slope as outlined in Technical Brief 16.

Once a drip irrigation system is up and running, farmers can explore fertigation, the addition of soluble fertilisers into the irrigation system water for distribution directly to plants.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Energy saving.
Increase Resilience
Increase crop yield.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Continued production in changing environments.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_24_DripIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Maximises efficiency in crop irrigation in dryland or variable climate conditions.
  • Minimizes the loss of water to evaporation.

Drawbacks

  • Requires consistent water source.
  • Costs of establishing the system, pump and lines/hoses can be significant depending on configuration, etc.
  • Requires continual monitoring and may need regular maintenance.

Supplemental Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Supplemental irrigation (SI) , also referred to as  Deficit Irrigation, is the application of water below full crop-water requirements, generally in drylands to assist crop growth in areas that experience low rainfall (300-500 mm/year). Supplemental irrigation involves adding limited amounts of water to rainfed crops to improve and stabilise yields when rainfall is insufficient for plant growth. Supplemental irrigation is a valuable and sustainable production strategy in dry regions or when experiencing irregular climatic conditions. This practice requires understanding of the yield response to water and the economic impact of loss in harvest. The aim of this technique is to ensure that the minimum amount of water is available during critical stages of crop growth.

Technical Application

To effectively undertake deficit irrigation:

  • Step 1: Determine critical growth cycle of desired crops.
  • Step 2: Experiment with SI strategies to determine critical watering times prior to upscaling.
  • Step 3: Strict management is required to determine the level of transpiration deficiency allowable without significant reduction in crop yields.
  • Step 4: Farmers capable of implementing deficit irrigation must have access to the minimum required water to implement deficit irrigation.
  • Step 5: Farmers must have access to a reliable water source, irrigation systems, including water distribution system, sprinklers and/or drip irrigation system.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Stabilises yield.
Increase Resilience
Adapts to real time rainfall conditions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_23_SupplementalIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increase crop production in dry areas or those experiencing drought.
  • Assist farmers manage crops at optimal times (low rainfall).

Drawbacks

  • Farmers must have access to enough water to meet minimum water requirements.
  • Require water distribution system that is functional.
  • Close management of crops to ensure that SI is implemented at critical crop production moments.

Solar Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Solar irrigation systems utilise solar energy to pump water to fields and distribute it through drip irrigation or other systems. Solar irrigation is a low-emission agricultural technology that replaces fossil fuel irrigation pumps reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This approach has the potential to reduce energy costs for irrigation and provide energy independence in rural areas. It provides opportunities to increase productivity by shifting from rainfed to irrigated agriculture in some areas. Solar irrigation systems require intensive management and regular monitoring to ensure the sustainable use of water resources. It requires maintenance of solar panels and irrigation equipment but can quickly yield a positive return on investment. Solar irrigation can be implemented for crop irrigation and livestock watering schemes and can improve food security, produce high value crops for sale, reduce energy costs and drive rural development. Although an expensive technology, solar irrigation can introduce significant operational savings if managed and maintained appropriately. It is considered a climate smart option as it can increase productivity, enable farms to adapt t climate changes and improve resilience, and the use of solar power reduces the use of on-grid, or diesel generator power, reducing emissions.

Technical Application

To effectively implement solar irrigation:

  • Step 1: To determine the solar pump system Crop water requirements, location, water sources etc. Do required research. Is water sourced from an above ground or below ground source?
  • Step 2: Source required materials to implement a solar irrigation system from regional or international suppliers including:
    • Photovoltaic (PV) panels to generate electricity (80-300 W system depending on context);
    • a structure to mount the panels;
    • a pump controller;
    • a surface or submersible water pump; and
    • a distribution system or storage tank for water.
  • Step 3: Identify funding sources as initial costs, as well as maintenance costs, must be considered and modelled prior to purchasing a system. There are regional and international solar irrigation producers.   These costs differ dramatically given the complexity of the context, starting at costs approximately USD $2,400 for equipment only. If drilling is necessary the cost increases significantly depending on depth, substrate etc.  Community-based investment, micro-leasing and rental services can be possible funding models to explore.
  • Step 4: Determine whether there is sufficient solar irradiation for the proposed area – consult and specialist; and/or the national meteorological service.
  • Step 5: Identify area suitable to install solar panels. The area should be easily accessible, and all trees/bush should be cleared. To determine most appropriate site and angle of panels, etc, consult an expert.
  • Step 6: The availability of technical expertise must be considered before implementation to ensure that any technical issues do not result in long period of service disruption.

Maintenance costs and expertise should be considered before installing solar irrigation systems. A detailed cost benefit analysis is advisable. Other key technical considerations include: Legal permits to extract water from the source as water extraction may impact community watershed levels.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Plants get enough water. Potential for two or more cropping seasons per year.
Increase Resilience
Predictable yields. Higher production equals increased food security/income and resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Significant reductions in CO2 emissions compared to grid and diesel-fuelled systems.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_22_SolarIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Energy independence will introduce significant cost savings for farmers.
  • Solar powered irrigation can significantly boost productivity, due to increased ability to sustainably irrigate crops.
  • Consistent irrigation can help to mitigate climate impacts, and aid adaptation.
  • Reduces operational costs for diesel or on-grid power to pump water.
  • Reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

Drawbacks

  • Solar irrigation is expensive to implement and there are costs for maintenance. Therefore, savings or access to credit will be required.
  • Access to solar equipment, spares and parts, and the transportation of the above may be complicated and/or expensive.
  • Over and above cost and access technology, other issues such as access to land and water sources are important factors.
Subscribe to Medium

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported