Skip to main content

Flooding Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Flooding irrigation is a practice where water is pumped or allowed to flow into channels passing between crop rows in areas where farmers have level fields. This flooding system is an effective method of managing weeds and pests, preventing the completion of their lifecycles as they are either drowned or isolated from air and sunlight. This practice is applicable in areas where there are favourable climatic conditions with high rainfall amounts; and is not recommended in arid and semi-arid environments. Flooding is controlled using water pumps in order to reduce waterlogging problems, and fields should not be entirely flooded, with surges of periodic flooding used to distribute water and avoid wastage to run-off, evaporation and creation of anaerobic conditions in the soil. Flood waters can be filtered using a fine mesh to control pests and diseases from spreading to neighbouring fields. Sandy soil is not favourable for flood irrigation as it does not evenly distribute water across the field whereas loam and clay soils distribute water efficiently across the field.

It is considered a climate smart practice because it requires less energy, and can promote crop productivity, whilst controlling weeds and pests.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage flooding irrigation:

  • Step 1: prepare the field, digging parallel furrows and raising beds with the excess soil. Crops are planted in beds, and the irrigation water will flow in the furrows.
  • Step 2: Using a pump or gravity fed water storage, allow water to flow into the field, flooding furrows.
  • Step 3: Insert a fine mesh or introduce a hessian sack at the in-flow point to trap weeds and pests.
  • Step 4: Water release should be moderated so as not to flow too fast and erode beds, and too slow such that it remains trapped at the in-flow point.
  • Step 5: Water release can be more effective if released in surges, taking advantage of infiltration rates and capillary action in soil.
  • Step 6: Observe progress. Avoid leaving soil crusts, which will make water rush over.

A sustainable water source must be identified and a pumping/irrigation system should be used.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Less energy is required to irrigate crops, potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions if generators used for pumping water.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective flood irrigation can increase
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_64_FloodingIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • A flood irrigation system reduces weed growth and acts as preventive measure against spread of pests and diseases.
  • Requires less energy, so reduces costs. Gravity does the work, so less need for pumping.
  • Flood irrigation can work with lower-quality water because the water doesn’t contact with crop leaves, which is usually a concern with waste water.

Drawbacks

  • Requires larger amounts of water than other types of irrigation – only suitable in wetter climates.
  • Is considered more labour intensive as land must be closely managed, and prepared.
  • Land must be level, or manually/mechanically levelled.
  • Cannot effectively operate in sandy soils.
  • Very clay-heavy soil can easily become water-logged.
  • If not managed properly, can be very wasteful with respect to water.

Weeding by Hand/Hoe

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A weed plant is an unwanted plant that grows among and competes with crops for water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space. The removal of such plants from fields – known as ‘weeding’ - is vital to enhancing crop growth. They can be removed by cutting their roots either by hand or using an implement such as a hoe. Some cereal crops like rice and maize attract weeds that are herbicide resistant; hence, the use of a hoe in removing the weeds is the most effective practice. However, as mechanic weeding can result in release of weed seeds into the soils as the hoe makes contact with the plant, weeding by-hand is the best way for weed removal to prevent weed seeds from falling onto the ground for further germination; this can increase the labour intensity of weeding considerably. This is a climate smart practice as it mitigates the emission of greenhouse gases from herbicides into the atmosphere, land and water systems. Furthermore, weeding helps maintain sustainable agricultural productivity, when considered an integral part of farm management and operations. However, weeding has been identified as one of the largest labour inputs for subsistence agriculture, accounting for between 30 and 50 % of on-farm labour requirements.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  mechanical weeding:

  • Step 1: Farmers should be able to identify weeds resistance to herbicides.
  • Step 2: Examine fields to understand level of weed infestation – can they be easily and effectively removed using a hoe, without spreading seeds, or will manual weeding be necessary.
  • Step 3: Attempt to quantify the amount of labour needed. Can the work be completed by the adults on the farm, or will additional labour be required? Will youths be involved in weeding? Will they miss school?
  • Step 4: Begin removal of weeds, ensuring that weeds are uprooted and removed from the field to avoid regeneration. A hoe must have a long handle to be able to work effectively and the hoe blade must not be too sharp in order to cut weeds without going through crops and spreading seed and cuttings.
  • Step 5: Weeding should take place a minimum of three times over the growing season – one week before planting crops, three weeks after planting (when the crop has two to three leaves), and two months after planting (milk-stage ). The aim is to reduce or eliminate the product of seeds in the weed plants.
  • Step 6: Draft animal-drawn cultivators can reduce labour requirements but should only be used to cultivate soil to a shallow depth, retaining soil structure, but not disturbing soil. Weeds should be collected by hand afterwards. Deeper tilling or turning of the soil with the wrong implement may cause more harm than good.
  • Step 7: Weeding must be sustained year on year to reduce prevalence. It is important to caution farmers that results may not be seen in significant reduction of plants until year-two of a weeding programme.
  • Step 8: Obnoxious weeds – such as Striga, etc – should be burned once pulled, preferably away from the field, in order to eradicate their presence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Weeding by hand is an effective method of controlling weeds, and ensuring maximum productivity.
Increase Resilience
A regular and diligent weeding strategy will maintain productivity in a changing climate.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Mitigates emission of greenhouse gases from release of herbicides into the atmosphere.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_60_WeedingbyHandHoe_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Weeding can reduce competition for crops in terms of water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space, making a crop more productive.
  • Weeding is cheaper than the use of herbicides.
  • Weeding by hand or hoe reduces the use of chemicals however, it is as effective as using herbicides.
  • Some weeds produce noxious gases which can have negative impacts on crop growth.

Drawbacks

  • Some of the cereal crops attract weeds that are resistant to herbicides.
  • Manual and mechanical weeding can be physically demanding and may require additional labour resources for larger fields.
  • Manual weeding requires approximately 25 % more labour than using herbicides.

Biological Control Vectors

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vectors are organisms that carry diseases from one living being to another without showing symptoms of the diseases themselves. Some of the most common forms of vectors are blood sucking insects such as mosquitos, fleas, lice, ticks and other similar insects, and rats/rodents. Places such as stagnant water and dumping sites can be ideal habitats for vectors to reside and transmit. The use of natural vector predators can help reduce or eliminate vector populations. The most common vectors in southern Africa are insects (tsetse flies-trypanosomiasis), animals (foot and mouth disease through cattle or people with contaminated shoes), tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF).  Sanitising the life-cycle of vectors, implementing pest traps and introducing pest predators are means of reducing the spread of disease. The impacts of climate change, especially increased heavy rainfall and higher temperatures can encourage vector populations to grow quicker than normal. Simple strategies to control vectors includes keeping livestock surroundings clean, avoiding livestock access to stagnant water, fencing areas off, restricting animal access to certain locations, can all control biological vectors and assist in reducing vector spread.

Technical Application

To effectively implement biological control vectors:

  • Step 1: Research common vectors in the local area and ensure that farmers are informed about the kinds, description, lifecycle and common habitats of these vectors, such as tsetse flies, ticks, biting flies.
  • Step 2: Avoid allowing livestock access to dirty and damp environments as well as very bushy areas as these locations are common habitats for vectors.
  • Step 3: Use of traps or even introduction of vector predators to livestock to manage vector spread could be used. This could include introducing epsilon traps for tsetse flies to promote vector control.
  • Step 4: If rodents are found in or around livestock, introduce rodent control methods such as traps and/or rodent predators (cats, etc) and bury any remains far from livestock areas.
  • Step 5: Fence off areas of high vector prevalence, such as stagnant water, ensuring that livestock do not access these areas.
  • Step 6: Examine any rangeland to determine whether there are vectors in the vicinity such as biting insect, or locusts that may damage maize crops and fruit flies that damage tomatoes.
  • Step 7: Community radio can be an effective method for extension officers to inform communities about outbreaks, or impending infestations.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_53_BiologicalControlVectors_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Identifying the common vectors in the area is a key first step to understanding how to manage them.
  • Using vector traps and introducing vector predators can also help manage livestock exposure.

Drawbacks

  • Biological vectors transport disease that can have devastating impacts on livestock.

Rotational Grazing

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Rotational grazing is a practice of moving livestock between different units of pasture in regular sequence to allow the recovery and regrowth of pasture plants after grazing. This facilitates management of the nutritional needs of the various types of livestock whilst maintaining pasture productivity. Management of intensive grazing/controlled grazing is a climate smart practice as it results in improved forage harvest, soil fertility, resistance to drought, reduced pasture weeds establishment, reduced wastage of forage and soil compaction.

Rotational grazing can also be combined with cut and carry approaches - when managed correctly; rotational grazing can provide enough forage growth early in the grazing season for producers to harvest feed for later use in some paddocks as rotation continues. Farmers can use temporary fence systems to manage the size of, and access to pastures.

Technical Application

To effectively carry out rotational grazing practices:

  • Step 1: Plan livestock grazing system, based on livestock types, stocking density, pasture crop hardiness and production, rainfall, soils and available alternative pasture fields and space, focusing on the nutritional and forage needs of the animals.
  • Step 2: Use temporary electric fence systems to manage the size of the paddock.
  • Step 3: Move livestock between paddocks every set number of days (two days; one week; one month).
  • Step 4: Assess forage quality and quantity, regulating the acreage of access and control by implementing the electric fence system, which uses electrified fencing to determine which parts of the pasture that the livestock will access.
  • Step 5: Monitoring efficacy of the system, changing rotation periods and extend recovery time for grazed land, if land becomes degraded.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased and more productivity per unit area.
Increase Resilience
Gives land time to recover after grazing and hence, being more resilient to extremes.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Increases vegetation cover and soil organic matter and locks carbon.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_47_RotationallGrazing_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Controlled rotational grazing is an effective conservation practice to apply that improves animal management, increases soil fertility, forage productivity, and reduces soil nutrient depletion and soil erosion.

Drawbacks

  • Appropriate land access is a issue, with farmers requiring substantial land or approval and agreement from the community to operationalise the approach.

Cut and Carry

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cut and carry is the agricultural practice of cutting and carrying fodder crops away from the field that they are grown in to feed to livestock. Fodder trees, shrubs or grasses are sources for livestock feed in this practice. Cut and Carry is a key CSA practice where overgrazing is a problem. This practice takes pressure off grazing land at critical periods, reduces land degradation caused by livestock and increases soil organic matter, while still feeding livestock for productive outcomes. This practice can also be used in more intensive livestock production where livestock are kept housed for periods stretching from half a year to a year and improved nutrition is required. However, fodder production can be costly in terms of cultivation, requiring significant management over and above the livestock themselves. Fodder is collected from sites where it grows naturally, or it can be grown in fodder banks, hedges, boundaries, etc. Feeding livestock using this approach can ensure the supply of a large quantity of high quality and palatable fodder within a short time, as well ensuring soil is not disturbed through open grazing systems, thus a good CSA practice. It can be adapted to the farmer’s needs and can provide a way of introducing the farmer to the concept of improving livestock at the same time as conserving soil.

Technical Application

To effectively implement cut and carry systems:

  • Step 1: Cut and carry commences with the cutting of the crop.
  • Step 2: Cut crop when plants are fully mature (vegetative growth and plant sugars are at their peak). This ensures that protein, digestible energy and dry matter percentage are at their highest potential.
  • Step 3: Fodder can be fed directly or dried as hay or preserved as silage to conserve its value and be fed to livestock during the dry season or other critical times throughout the year.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Fodder can be harvested on multiple occasions during times of plenty and preserved for later, rather than leaving as standing hay.
Increase Resilience
Reduces pressure of grazing by limiting period livestock tread on land causing denudation at critical periods (with less cover).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_46_CutAndCarry_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Improves fodder production and farm income.
  • Growing fodder crops in rainy seasons encourages fodder conservation for dry season feeding.
  • Can be combined with crop rotation and intercropping to form part of positive farm management practices.
  • Cut and carry can relieve pressure from pasture and grazing land, contributing to control of over-grazing, while improving soil quality.
  • Can create job opportunities and income generation for youth farmers.

Drawbacks

  • The practice will require additional labour resources.
  • Can be costly in terms of management.
  • Farmers must have enough land to grow fodder on or have access to communal land.
  • Soil condition in the fodder fields must be carefully monitored to ensure that soil nutrients aren’t depleting.
  • Fodder storage must be monitored to ensure bacteria and mould do not affect the quality of feed.

Carrying Capacity Improvement

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Carrying capacity defines the number of Animal Units (AU; head of cattle or number of sheep, goats or other animals) that can graze in a rangeland unit without exhausting the vegetation and soil quality – essentially optimally utilising resources. Optimum carrying capacity is where a given unit of rangeland can support healthy populations of animal species, while allowing an ecosystem to regenerate, thus creating a sustainable balance. The stocking rate - defined as the number of animal species grazing a unit of rangeland for a limited period - must be kept fixed on an average year, meeting the carrying capacity to allow regeneration, the fallen seeds to rejuvenate and the soil to recover. However, stocking rates can fluctuate depending on the nature of the vegetation, rainfall variability, herd composition and management system. If the conditions are not favourable for vegetation growth during drought season, the number of livestock or the grazing period must be adjusted to avoid overgrazing. Moreover, the purpose of livestock keeping, i.e. for milk, meat, or wool production, will determine the carrying capacity of a rangeland unit. Factors such as climatic zone, rainfall dependency, class of livestock (steer, dry cow, calves, lactating cow and bull, etc), health of grassland and animal species affect the stocking rate. While relevant in all climatic zones, it is more applicable in arid and semi-arid zones where rainfall is most scarce. This climate smart practice increases production (meat/dairy), increases pasture resilience to extreme climate hazards (drought) and enhances soil fertility.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Carrying capacity improvement:

  • Step 1: There is no standard equation to determine the carrying capacity of an area, as many variables apply and factors relevant within each context including size of land unit, amount, frequency and timing of rainfall seasons, type of vegetation, species of animal, etc.
  • Step 2: Extension officers should aim to support farmers to continuously monitor rangeland status and realise the impacts of over-grazing and the benefits of finding an equilibrium.
  • Step 3: Constant monitoring of the pasture and animals must be carried out throughout the year to check if stocking rate aligns with the carrying capacity of the land unit. If land degradation is identified, adjustments to stocking rates should be considered, in the context of season and landscape regeneration.
    • For communal grazing land, it is ideal to use Animal Units (AU) to calculate the relative grazing impact of different kinds and classes of domestic livestock and/or even common grazing wildlife species for one month (AUM = Animal Unit Months). This information should support collective decision-making regarding rangeland resources.

        Using a conversion table of, the AUE (Animal Unit Equivalent) and the formula:

        1) multiply the number of animals to be grazed on the pasture by AUE to determine total AU, then

        2) multiply the total AU by the number of months planned to graze (see formula below or

        Worksheet A of the Range Calculator).

        Formula: _____________ x _____________ = _____________ x _____________ = _____________

                        # Animals         AUE(table)     Animal Units (AU)   Months (M)           AUM

  • Step 4: One option for effectively responding to carrying capacity challenges is shift or changing grazing species if high consumption species are placing pressure on a particular unit of land.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Higher meat and/ or dairy production per unit area.
Increase Resilience
Improved pasture (through proper management) allow higher numbers without retrogression, thus more resilient even to drought conditions, erosion, flooding, etc.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Increases soil organic matter and plants-thus locks more carbon (c-sequestration).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_43_CarryingCapacityImprovement_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Identifying, achieving and maintaining optimal carrying capacity helps to avoid rangeland degradation including vegetation depletion and soil erosion, bush encroachment, and optimises resource use.
  • Effectively monitoring carrying capacity can allow communities to respond to climate change impacts, resulting from shifting rainfall patterns and temperature regimes.

Drawbacks

  • Rainfall dependency, class of livestock and quality of grassland affect stocking rate.
  • The stocking rate must be monitored to avoid animal overcrowding, which might cause diseases to spread quickly.
  • It is important to monitor the plant species in your pasture and or rangelands to be able to determine its health and trend.
  • Reseeding should be considered in areas when land is degrading.

Agroforestry: Silvo-Pasture

Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Agroforestry is a land management practice that combines the planting and management of trees and shrubs with crops and pasture, providing benefits of soil health, crop yields, resilience to climate change, biodiversity and economic opportunities. Agroforestry encompasses numerous practices, including silvo-pasture, agro-silvo cultural, and agro-silvo-pastural. One such successful agroforestry practice is silvo-pasture – the planting of trees and shrubs within livestock grazing pasture lands. Not to be confused with agrosilvopasture (combination of crops, shrubs/trees and livestock, silvopasture is the combination of trees and shrubs with pastural grazing land. The trees can be regularly or irregularly placed, and in addition to improving soil conditions in pasture lands, also provide production of protein-rich tree fodder for on farm feeding and for cut-and-carry fodder production. If growing larger species of tree, coppicing can also produce timber for building materials and firewood.

Technical Application

To effectively implement hedge planting:

  • Step 1: Purchase saplings of selected tree species from a local nursery or grow saplings in separate on-farm nursery. If growing on-farm, saplings should be held-up with an upright support bamboo/wooden pole. Ideally, the farmer should begin exploring silvopasture tree species beginning with indigenous trees, such as acacias, and other local trees. It is worth considering a mixture of species, as well as mixed shallower and deeper rooted trees.
  • Step 2: Once at a meter or over in height, transplant to pastures, surrounding each individual sapling with a wire mesh cage-tube or insert into five-centimetre diameter PVC pipe to protect from browsers. Plant at least ten to twenty meters apart, in either a random or uniform pattern. This is a matter of preference.
  • Step 3: Once saplings are planted, only allow grazing livestock (cows, sheep, ducks, geese, chickens) in the silvopasture, avoiding browsers (goats, etc), which will strip, damage or destroy the saplings.
  • Step 4: Once mature and above browsing height, two plus meters, remove protective cage or pipe.
  • Step 5: Depending on species, pruning, coppicing etc should be performed every two months to ensure that trees remain healthy and productive, while maximising outputs for in-field and cut and carry fodder.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Diversified agricultural outputs supports sustainable agricultural productivity, providing multiple streams of revenue, reducing labour and cost for land clearance and maintaining healthy pasture land.
Increase Resilience
As climate change alters local grazing land, silvopasture can reduce overgrazing and land degradation. Trees introduced into pasture can create a more positive environment for livestock, including shade in warmer climates, and shelter during rainfall.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Retaining trees within pasture land and minimising complete conversion of land reduces greenhouse gas emissions and retains carbon in the soil.
Additional Information
  • Balehegn, M., 2017. Silvopasture Using Indigenous Fodder Trees and Shrubs: The Underexploited Synergy Between Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in the Livestock Sector. Chapter from book The Need for Transformation: Local Perception of Climate Change, Vulnerability and Adaptation Versus ‘Humanitarian’ Response in Afar Region, Ethiopia (pp.493-510). ResearchGate.
  • Jose, S. & Dollinger, 2019. Silvopasture: a sustainable livestock production system. Chapter in J. Agroforest Syst (2019)
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_34_SilvoPasture_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Presence of trees can be beneficial to livestock in terms of shade and shelter, as well as enhancing carbon storage and enriching biodiversity.
  • Manure from livestock can improve soil health in grazing land.
  • Leaf litter and pruned material also add organic matter to soil, improving productivity and drainage.
  • Presence of trees can contribute to reducing soil erosion.
  • Trees can produce numerous forest products, including timber for firewood and construction.
  • There is an opportunity to diversify income for small-holder farms and increase food security.
  • Tree trimmings and leaf litter can also be used for in-field or cut and carry fodder.

Drawbacks

  • Requires some investment in terms of purchase of seed and/or saplings.
  • May require adjustment for mixed grazing and browsing livestock patterns.
  • If dietary requirements of livestock are not complete, animals may strip bark from trees. This can be avoided by ensuring that pasture stocking is not too high, and best efforts are made to encourage pasture health and supplementing livestock feed with the necessary minerals, energy and protein.

System of Rice Intensification (SRI)

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Altitudinal Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is an agro-ecological practice for increasing the productivity of irrigated rice cultivation by changing the management of water, plants, soil and nutrients. SRI promotes the growth of root systems, increases the abundance and diversity of soil organisms by keeping the soil moist but not flooded, and provides frequent aeration and conditioning of soil with organic matter. This agro-ecological practice stimulates plant growth by transplanting young seedlings, avoiding disturbance to roots and providing crops with wider spacing to encourage greater root and canopy growth. The agricultural methodology is based on well-founded agro-ecological principles which have been successfully adapted to upland rice and have shown increased productivity over current conventional planting practices.

Technical Application

To effectively implement SRI practices:

  • Step 1: Consider separation of high-quality seeds from low-quality seeds through soaking them in plain or salt water and the unviable seeds will float on the surface of the water.
  • Step 2: Plant the seeds on an unflooded, raised bed with adequate drainage and fertile soil.
  • Step 3: After 8-12 days, transplant single young seedlings into a grind pattern with wide spacing between hills (25 cm x 25 cm).
  • Step 4: During crop growth period, control the flooding and research and follow alternate wetting and drying irrigation practices.
  • Step 5: Consider application of compost and mineral fertiliser for nutrient enhancement.
  • Step 6: Use a mechanical weeder for the control of weeds and maximisation of soil aeration.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced inputs for greater yield.
Increase Resilience
Predictable yields. Higher production equals increased food security/income and resilience..
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
May reduce GHG emissions from irrigation pumps.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_32_SRI_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increased and diversified crop yield resulting in increased farm income.
  • Improved food security.
  • SRI reduces GHG emissions.
  • Existing water availability patterns to accommodate the irrigation schedule.

Drawbacks

  • SRI is a labour-intensive agricultural practice.
  • Occurrence of methane emissions from rice fields caused by flooding.

Rainwater Harvesting

Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Rainwater harvesting is an agricultural technique of collecting and storing rainwater or runoff in tanks or natural reservoirs. This practice is mostly practiced in arid or semi-arid areas with temporal and spatial variability of rainfall mostly lost as surface runoff or evaporation. Runoff is harvested and utilised as a preventative measure for soil erosion, as well as a water management strategy for irrigating crops and for livestock water. This technique enables farmers to capture and store rainwater during times of plenty for use during times of scarcity. Rainwater harvesting is a technology that maximises the use of existing freshwater resources and is a useful technology for water resource planners and managers in both governmental and non-governmental organisations, institutions and communities.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Rainwater Harvesting practices:

  • Step 1: Create a water collection zone connected to a gutter system.
  • Step 2: Install filters to the water collection zone.
  • Step 3: Connect a hose pipe for easy distribution of irrigation water.
  • Step 4: If a farmer intends to use water for human consumption other than flushing toilets, etc, water quality must be frequently tested using reliable and low-cost/low-tech solutions.
  • Step 5: Use of filters can be considered to reduce particulate and other pollutants but should be thoroughly investigated – as a separate subject – by the extension officer and the farmer, otherwise it could lead to illness. It is recommended that farms utilise harvested rainwater for irrigation and other farming activities only.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
More water available to plants when it is needed.
Increase Resilience
Mitigate dry spells.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_30_RainwaterHarvesting_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Rainwater harvesting acts as a source of water at a point where it is needed, usually stored in a tank.
  • Works as an alternative water source in cases of drought or irrigation system breakdown.
  • Rooftop rainwater catchment construction is simple.
  • Success in rainwater harvesting depends on frequency and amount of rainfall.

Drawbacks

  • Asphalt, tar and wood roofs may contaminate the water making it unsafe for direct human consumption.
  • For potable water collection, lead containing gutters should not be used.
  • Harvested water may be contaminated by animal waste.

Permeable Rock Dams

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A permeable rock dam is a water harvesting technique where flooding rain water is collected in valley bases or other depressions to irrigate crops later/elsewhere, filling in gullies, controlling water flows, increasing crop production and reducing soil erosion.. Permeable rock dams are long and relatively shallow to reduce erosion while accumulating silt and distributing water. They comprise of long low rock walls with smooth crests so that water can spread to avoid overflow from the dam. However, this technology is site specific; it cannot be practiced in areas where there are no rocks/stones and means of transporting these building materials. The impoundment of silt prior to runoff entering a watercourse can be beneficiary to downstream users and can contribute to improved water quality in the catchment

Technical Application

To effectively implement Permeable Rock Dam practices, the following steps should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Consider constructing a permeable rock dam across relatively wide and shallow valleys.
  • Step 2: Permeable rock dams should consist of long, low rock walls with level crest along full length although farmers should consider central spillways where water course has cracks.
  • Step 3: The dam should be between 50-300m in length and 1m in height within a gully.
  • Step 4: Consider making the dam wall flatter on the downslope side than on the upslope side.
  • Step 5: A foundation of small stones should be set in the trench.
  • Step 6: An apron of large rocks is essential to split the erosive force of the overflow.
  • Step 7: Downstream banks of the water stream should be shielded by stone pitching to prohibit the increase of the gully.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Supports agricultural productivity as soil structure is retained and provides access to more sustainable water supplies.
Increase Resilience
Supports adaptation strategies in climate changes scenarios with improved access to water for irrigation and reducing soil erosion.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_29_PermeableRockDams_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Permeable rock dams increase crop production.
  • Reduce soil erosion.
  • The system increases groundwater recharge.

Drawbacks

  • The technology is site specific; should be on a site where rocks and stones are present.
  • Need for large quantities of stone.
Subscribe to Positive

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported