Skip to main content

Integrated Pest Management

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is the careful consideration of all available pest control techniques and subsequent integration of appropriate measures that discourage the development of pest populations and keep pesticides and other interventions to levels that are economically justified and reduce or minimise risks to human health and the environment, focusing on all practical options for reducing or eliminating pesticides. The practice of IPM for crop protection is widely encouraged, as the practice can enhance crop production and reduce risks associated with use, storage and management of pesticides. The integrated nature of this approach ensures that it is climate smart, as it utilises the best possible options to ensure sustainable productivity, which will in turn allow adaptation to climate change. However, as it may require the use of pesticides as one strategy, the climate-smartness may be affected.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage integrated pest management:

  • Step 1: Identify damage and responsible pest. Regular crop monitoring is important, to ensure early identification. Bottle traps are useful for capturing samples to examine and identify a pest.
  • Step 2: Learn about the pest and host life cycle and biology.
  • Step 3: Monitor or sample environment for pest population.
  • Step 4: Establish action threshold. If aiming to tackle weed infestation, intervention must occur before the weed matures and begins spreading seeds. Some thresholds are high. For example, if dealing with caterpillars, soya beans can tolerate a certain level of defoliation without it impacting crop yield.
  • Step 5: Identify IPM response tactics.
    • Cultural methods –planting crops that are adapted or suited to conditions and responding to their water, nutrient and shelter needs.
    • Physical methods – mechanical weeding, such as mechanical weeding or using organic or plastic mulch to cover the ground to reduce weed presence/success.
    • Genetic methods – selecting modified or adapted pest-resistant varieties.
    • Biological methods – using natural predators, push-pull approaches, intercropping, etc. and use of use of organic pesticides.
    • Chemical methods – considering all levels of toxicity – from pheromone deterrents to conventional pesticides.
  • Step 6: monitoring for ongoing efficacy, and adjustment of tactics where relevant/necessary.  Aiming at all times to use chemical pesticides rationally and as a very last resort.

In the cases where chemical pesticides are used as part of an IPM strategy, the Agri-Intel website is an invaluable resource, which provides detailed chemical management advice: https://www.agri-intel.com.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Practical reduction or elimination of pesticide use reduces or removes the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
Increase Resilience
Practical reduction or elimination of pesticide use reduces or removes the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
IPM maximises opportunities for agricultural productivity while minimising or eliminating the use of pesticides.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_65_IntergratedPestManagement_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • IPM is the agricultural practice of combining several practices to maximise benefits.
  • Pesticides are used following the safety information given on the packaging, when other approaches are not effective

Use of Organic/Chemical Control of Pests

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Locally/home-made organic pest control involves the use of home-made remedies to kill and control pests naturally without harming the crop or the environment. Some of the natural pesticides that farmers can use includes soap water, neem, chilli, vegetable oil spray and garlic. These natural remedies are cheaper than the use of chemicals but should be applied in specific amounts for them to be effective. The field must be kept clean to avoid weeds, which provide habitats for insects and weaker crops that are infected must be removed and disposed of away from the field area to avoid attracting further infestations. It is important to minimise disturbance of soil through digging or tilling if not necessary as this can introduce pests into the soil. Alternative approaches such as intercropping, crop rotation, and push/pull systems can also contribute to preventing the spread of pests. This is a climate smart option as it reduces the contribution of pesticides/insecticides to greenhouse gas emissions, and supports sustainable agricultural productivity. If organic insecticides are not effectively killing insects at the rate the farmer wants/needs, chemical controls can be used to halt pest infestation and avoid complete crop loss. However, chemical control of pests should always be the last resort, as chemical pesticides while often hugely effective, are expensive and must be applied precisely to be effective. Furthermore, if used inaccurately chemical pesticides can contaminate crops and the environment, and can impact the farmers’ health. The use of chemicals destroys natural pest enemies and can lead to pest invasion and resistance to pesticides in future, driving continued reliance on chemicals. For example, ants can be a very effective biological control agent against Fall Armyworm (FAW); however, ant populations will also be affected by pesticides.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage chemical use of organic control measures:

  • Organic pesticides must be made based on the type of pests that attack the field along with their productivity rate.
  • Equipment needed. Small measures (teaspoons or baking measures), plastic cup, plastic bucket (>1 litre), stirring rod or large spoon/spatula. Spray bottles or back-pack pump spray. Tools used in the field must be cleaned properly to avoid attracting other pests
  • When spraying, wear goggles, gloves and disposable masks, and avoid spraying on windy or rainy days.
  • It is recommended that any spray is tested before large-scale application. Spray and leave for 24 hours to see if treatment is effective.

a. Basic neem oil spray insecticide: effective against aphids, whiteflies, snails, nematodes, mealybugs, cabbage worms,  gnats, moths, cockroaches, flies, termites, mosquitoes, and scale.

  • Step 1: Mix 1 cup of vegetable oil with 1 tablespoon of liquid soap in a plastic beaker or cup (cover and shake thoroughly),
  • Step 2: When ready to apply, mix oil spray mix with 1 litre of water,
  • Step 3: Pour spray mix into a spray bottles or a back-pack pump spray,
  • Step 4: Shake thoroughly, and spray directly on the surfaces of affected plants. The oil coats the bodies of the insects, effectively suffocating them, as it blocks the pores through which they breathe.
    - Use mixture within eight-hours.

b. Garlic spray: a general organic insecticide that kills most insects.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Use of organic pesticides/insecticides avoids the use of chemical compounds that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.
Increase Resilience
These can be effective tools to combat insect infestations as climates change.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective control of insect pests can help maintain crop production and avoid crop losses.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_63_ChemcialUseofOrganicControl_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The use of organic insecticides promotes biodiversity as it does not kill pest enemies unlike when using chemicals.
  • Healthy soil is required by applying compost and manure in order to not attract pests.
  • When handling chemicals, health precaution must be in place such as wearing gloves and nose masks to avoid contamination.

Drawbacks

  • The natural remedies are cheaper than chemical control, but they do not kill pests as fast as chemicals.
  • Inappropriate use of pesticides can be harmful to both farmers and food therefore, pesticide application guidelines must be followed to ensure efficiency.

Biological Control of Pests

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

The use of chemical insecticides and pesticides can be expensive and therefore not an economically viable option for small scale farmers, while also not being climate smart – widespread use of pesticides and herbicides contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Encouraging natural predators can be an effective method for controlling and managing pests in some instances. With governments across the globe discouraging the use of chemical insecticides and pesticide products, biological control of pests is preferred and encouraged - using living organisms to control pests. Natural predators are insects that feed on pests without damaging the crop and can be found throughout the crops. Encouraging natural predators helps in supressing pests during their early and late lifecycles, improving crop production and reducing pollution caused by pesticides use. The introduction of water-fowl, such ducks in rice systems can be a highly effective form of biological control of pests. They enjoy aquatic habitats, consume insects and can even contribute to weeding as tear up weed plants as they look for food. Insect predators have different roles in controlling pests, there are predators that will control pests in the early pest lifecycle where they feed on their larvae and eggs while some are present at the late pest cycle where they feed on mature insects. Some species of ants are natural predators of stemborer pests, and wasp and some fly species larvae are parasitoids (larvae that feed on a host organism) prey on fall armyworm. One such wasp is the tiny (3 mm in length) Cotesia marginiventris which feeds on FAW caterpillars. The minute (0.5 mm in length) Trichogramma was species lays it’s eggs inside FAW eggs, killing the FAW larvae in the process. Earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae, Carcinophoridae), ground beetles and ladybird beetles are also known to prey on FAW caterpillars. The issue with many of these solutions is volume of consumption, which may be too low to impact an infestation. Ants are the most important predators of FAW, as the communities consume larger quantities of FAW. However, pesticides drastically impact ant populations.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage biological control and encourage natural predators:

  • Step 1: Conduct regular monitoring using field walk-throughs and utilise bottle traps with various lures/baits to identify main pests on crops in order to identify any pests.
  • Step 2: Once the pests have been identified, consult with national research institutes to identify the best natural predators, or biological control agents* to address the particular pests. It is critical to understand what options are available and costs associated with each option.
  • Step 3: Implement according to advice received.
  • Step 4: Monitor progress in terms of reduction in numbers and incidences.
  • Step 5: Adjust the approach based upon observations from the fields.

A farmer must study the lifecycles of insect predators and be aware of pests that feed on his/her crops in order to identify the intervention that will the most effective in controlling pests at difference phases of their lifecycles. Farmers can create welcoming environments for certain predators to attract them to the field area

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reducing pests of all kinds can reduce crop and harvest losses.
Increase Resilience
As climate changes, pests and insects will also change. Bottle traps will help.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_62_BiologicalControlOfPests_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Encouraging natural predators helps improve crop production, reduces the use of pesticides which can pollute both the crop and environment.
  • Introducing a natural predator, or biological control agent can reduce the risk of crop failure, and increase agricultural productivity.
  • Archytas, Winthemia and Lespesia flies prey on FAW eggs, with the fly-maggots feeding on the FAW larvae in order to grow. And ants can be highly effective predators of FAW.
  • Ducks are highly effective in rice paddy fields.

Drawbacks

  • Natural predators are often highly specific to a certain predator, and location/geography/climate; hence, research must be done to establish the most effective method of control.
  • Some natural predators do not consume enough prey to reduce infestations, meaning despite best efforts, crops may still fail.

Mechanical Bottle Traps

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Bottle traps are an agricultural technology used to lure insects inside containers (bottles) containing bait of either food or chemical attractants. The objective is to lure pest insects to identify them for pest control, as part of overall pest monitoring, including field walks, observation and crop inspections. In larger fields they are used solely for pest identification. In smaller fields a number of traps can be used as a pest control method, trapping the insects, but this is not a common approach. Bottle traps must be installed in locations close to or amongst crops and across the farm in order to attract insects for identification and should be used throughout all cropping season to ensure that pests can be identified earlier. As a component of Integrated Pest Management, bottle traps with different lures or baits can be used to attract and identify most types of aphids and mites, fruit flies, stem borers, and fall army worm. While many of the lures and baits can be made at home or on the farm, pheromone-based baits need to be purchased from agricultural suppliers. While this introduces costs, bottle traps and lures can contribute significantly pest management, through early identification so appropriate action can be taken. This technology can contribute to climate smart agriculture objectives, as bottle traps and lures can reduce the amount of pesticides used, reducing greenhouse gas emissions; they can help with identifying new pests and insects as climates shift; and as pests are identified or reduced, productivity can increase. It is important for farmers and workers to keep records of pests identified to ensure that appropriate responses are enacted. There could be cases where infestation levels are low and the cost of taking action may be more that nominal crop losses. However, the opposite may be true, but decisions cannot be made without relevant information for extension workers to discuss with farmers.

Technical Application

To effectively use mechanical bottle traps, the following should be carried out:

Bottle-trap

  • Step 1: Obtain 2L plastic water or soft-drink bottles.
  • Step 2: Rinse bottles thoroughly to avoid contents affecting lure.
  • Step 3: Cut bottle horizontally using sharp scissors or knife, ensure that the top-half is slightly shorter than lower-half.
  • Step 4: Turn the shorter top-half upside down and insert into lower-half ensuring the top- half does not touch the lower surface of the bottom-half.
  • Step 5: Poke holes in both sides, penetrating both layers (top and bottom halves) and insert string, cord, or wire to create a handle.
  • Step 6: Hang on tree branches or on thick wire or wooden stands around field perimeter and in larger fields within fields.

Specially designed all army worm traps can be purchased at agricultural suppliers. Farmers may also need a magnifying glass to identify insects.

Lures or bait

  • Step 1: Identify the types of insect or pest you wish to lure, to ensure the correct mix.
    • For fall army worms, use a pheromone lure – which should be purchased from an agricultural supplier.
    • For maize stalk/stem-borers, again pheromone bait is the most effective.
    • Flies are attracted by sugar-based solutions, or protein (meat) based for carrion flies.
    • Fruit flies are attracted by ripe-fruit, cider vinegar, beer and wine.
  • Step 2: Place 2 to 4 cm of lure at the bottom of the lower half of the bottle, depending on size of the bottle – the larger the bottle, the more lure. Ensure that the lure smell must be strong, but not too intense so that it attracts insects rather than chasing them away.
  • Step 3: Use only one lure per bottle trap as more than one might cause contamination leading to ineffective attractants.
  • Step 4: Clearly mark bottles indicating the type of lure in use – permanent marker pen.

Use of disposable gloves is advisable when handling lures.

Unopened pheromone lure packets should be kept in a cool, dry places – preferably a refrigerator.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Can lead to reduced usage of pesticides, hence reducing GHG emissions.
Increase Resilience
As climate changes, pests and insects will also change. Bottle traps will help.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The use of bottle traps can be used to identify pests for control, supporting productivity through appropriate pest control.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_61_MechanicalBottleTraps_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Bottle trapping is a cheap and effective method for monitoring insects on a farm and identifying those that may affect productivity and/or lead to significant losses.
  • This technique can be used to identify the insect that are infesting the field and which areas they are more concentrated, providing information for targeted interventions.
  • In smaller fields, or in times of intense infestation, bottle traps themselves can be used to lure and control pests.

Drawbacks

  • Precaution is required when handling chemical-based lures as they can be harmful to humans and animals, and can negatively impact crop yield if used incorrectly.
  • Some lures can only be purchased at agricultural suppliers.
  • Cannot be used operationally to control pests in larger fields.

Short Term Reactive Practices

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Short-term reactive practices are control options for pests and diseases once they have reached a level where the economic losses are likely to be greater than the cost of controlling the pest/disease outbreaks and can be used to maintain or increase production. Pests and diseases are better detected at an earlier stage to make it easier to act and prevent severe crop losses and prohibit the spread of pests and diseases throughout the whole field, achieved through regular and systematic field inspections. The practice is considered climate smart as it reduces losses, which in-balance lowers greenhouse gas emissions per tonne of crop produced, it retains agricultural productivity through management of pest infestation and/or disease outbreaks, and is applicable as it can assist farmers adjust to changing climate, and the threat of new and changing pest diseases.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  short term reactive practices:

  • Step 1: Inspecting the crop regularly and systematically by walking through the field following an M-shaped pattern will ensure that the farmer does not just look around the edges, but also inspects in the middle of the field.
  • Step 2: Farmers should carefully examine the crops for any signs of pests/diseases. They may be able to identify the presence of pests or disease through observing the following:
    • If the plant is wilted.
    • Are the leaves more yellow than usual?
    • Are the crops smaller than usual?
    • Do the leaves have spots?
    • Have parts of the plan died?
  • Step 3: Once the foreign specie has been identified, the farmer should employ a method to eradicate the issue thoroughly and immediately.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced losses result in lower GHG emissions per tonne produced.
Increase Resilience
Reduces losses due to management of pest/disease outbreaks.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Farmers can make informed decisions resulting in sustainable losses.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_59_ShortTermReactivePractices_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Short term reactive practices eradicate the pest or disease.
  • The aim is to protect the long-term health of the field/herd for the next season or growing period.

Drawbacks

  • Pests and disease can have devastating impacts on both crops and livestock and can persist throughout growing seasons.

Push and Pull Systems

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A push pull system is a technique that repels parasitic plants and pests that attach themselves to the crop roots and feed on them.. In push-pull, a cereal crop is intercropped with a leguminous plant like desmodium or molasses grass, while a popular fodder crop, Napier grass, is planted as a border around the field. Desmodium produces volatile chemicals that attract predators of the cereal e.g of maize pests. More importantly, by giving a false distress signal to the moths that the area is already infested, these chemicals ‘push’ the egg laying moths away from the crop to seek out habitats where their larvae will face less competition for food. Napier grass also produces volatile chemicals that ‘pull’ the moths towards them, and then exudes a sticky substance that traps the stem borer larvae as they feed. Few larvae survive. Napier grass attracts stem borer predators.  The intercropping is a climate smart practice as it mitigates emission of Greenhouse gases through the reduced need for pesticides. The push-pull system improves food security and boosts farm income.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  push and pull systems:

  • Step 1: Plant Napier and a legume like Desmodium or molasses grass  between every three rows of maize/sorghum as barriers to repel stemborers away from crops.
  • Step 2: Plant the Desmodium first as soon as the rains begin, so it immediately repels the stalk borers before the maize/sorghum emerge.
  • Step 3: Plant three rows of Naiper grass around the borders of maize field.
  • Step 4:  Allow pest enemies such as ants and spiders to enter the field to feed on stemborers.
  • Step 5: Cut grass and fed to animals as forage.
  • Step 6:  Abandon areas that are heavily affected by stemborers until treated.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
A push-pull system supports sustainable productivity by reducing the need for expensive pesticides, and boosting farm income.
Increase Resilience
A sustainable and environmentally friendly method for maintaining soil health and productivity while controlling pests.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced application of synthetic fertilisers reduces greenhouse gas emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_58_PushandPullSystems_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Reduces the need for pesticides.
  • Improves food security and boost farmers’ income.
  • The green technique deals with trapping the pests (pull) and repelling them (push) by planting Napier and desmodium or molasses grass next to cereal crops.
  • The relationship between insect-plant and insect-insect (introducing pest enemies such as ants/spiders) is achieved in order to kill stemborers.
  • Grass planted next to crops can be salvaged and used as forage.

Drawbacks

  • Naiper grass take up space on the field.
  • Cost and lack of availability of Desmodium seed.
  • Difficulty in establishing the Desmodium crop, hence practice not suitable for all farmers.

Resistant Varieties

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Resistant varieties are new crop varieties that improve yield production, are resistant to pests and diseases, more tolerant to drought, salinity or other changing or undesirable environmental conditions. Crop plants used within this practice are usually only resistant to a limited number of undesirable characteristics e.g. pests or drought – but usually not both, and some other desirable traits may be lost while others may be strengthened. Hence, careful selection of candidate species must be undertaken. Resistance varieties common in southern Africa include drought resistant maize, sorghum, rice and cowpea (beneficial legume for intercropping) strains, striga (witch weed) resistant sorghum and maize strains, and others all help farmers adapt to changing climate conditions, by being able to farm crops that survive the increasingly variable climate, which can result in less rainfall, or the presence of new pests. Striga results in crop losses totalling over USD 1 billion per year, whereas research has shown that planting climate resilient maize varieties can lead to up to a 25 % increase in crop yields.

Exploring new pest or drought resistant varieties in a regional will require demonstration and testing in ‘test plots’, so extension workers can ensure that the outcomes are aligned with farmers wants/needs/tastes, and so farmers are familiar with the new varieties before they are mainstreamed. Acceptance of new varieties, and any changes is traits will be critical, as resistant varieties is a key intervention for climate adaptation in southern Africa, as they will allow farmers to remain productive for longer under challenging conditions, and while different crops altogether are investigated.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage resistant varieties, the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Survey farmers and meet with other local and national level extension officers to determine key interventions required – drought tolerance, prevalence of certain pests, etc.
  • Step 2: Research and meet other local extension officers to discuss best methods applied to the agricultural practice of resistant varieties in the region.
  • Step 3: Talk to the agricultural dealers and seed manufacturers about the varieties being offered and their characteristics.
  • Step 4: Talk to the agricultural research departments about best opportunities under climatic change in your specific area.
  • Step 5: Either independently or in partnership with seed manufacturers, establish test plots of viable resistant varieties in key locations to act as demonstration plots for farmers to visit, observe growth and harvest, and test the outcomes. Many conditions may come into play when attempting to mainstream resistant varieties, including visual aspects, harvesting and processing differences, palatability and taste, etc. All of these issues must be discussed with farmers during testing and roll-out to ensure resources are not wasted with varieties that will fail.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced incidence of pests and disease results in higher yields.
Increase Resilience
Healthier and more pest resilient farm and landscape. Prediction of pest outbreaks enables earlier management decisions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced losses result in lowering GHG emissions per tonne produced
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_57_ResistantVarieties_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The practice is widely used to increase yield production, produce pest and disease resistant varieties and improve environmental tolerance.
  • Further combines the best traits of the parental forms resulting in some strengths and weaknesses, resulting in a variation of crops species.

Drawbacks

  • May require investment and/or access to credit, as new seeds will not be in farmer seed banks/stores and may be expensive to kick-start implementation.
  • May take time to launch new varieties and gain acceptance from farmers/consumers/markets.

Vaccination Campaigns

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vaccination is the administration of immunisation injections to animals in order to prevent, control spread of diseases.  Vaccination campaigns involve administration of vaccine doses to a large population over a short period of time. The veterinary services departments or equivalent of respective countries normally gives free vaccinations to the farming community's animals for diseases which are of either economic significance to people's livelihoods or those that maybe of zoonotic importance (communicable to man from animals). These campaigns are usually fully funded by the government, NGOs to reduce disease outbreaks, prevent spread of an outbreak or improve national herd productivity, and are designed to reach as much livestock as possible. In most countries, free vaccinations are offer for the following diseases: Anthrax(-Cattle), Quarter evil or black quarter disease (Cattle), Contagious abortion (Cattle), Rabies (Dogs & Cats), Foot and Mouth Disease(Cattle)_ as per OIE designation in Disease Control Zones.

 For the message to reach farmers, community radios and involvement of traditional leadership can be used to encourage farmers to participate in vaccination campaigns.  This will help to gain trust and confidence from farmers for the campaign to be successful. Vaccination campaigns is a climate smart practice as it ensures a healthy population able to utilize feed efficiently with a reduced population discharge thus reduced GHG emission.

Technical Application

To effectively implement vaccination campaigns:

  • Step 1: Networks that notify farmers about upcoming vaccination campaigns must be established to promote the significance of vaccinating animals across the country. This can be promoted through government bulletins and community radio, utilising extension networks, village level administration, and traditional leadership.
  • Step 2: Vaccination parks for cattle can be set up by veterinary officials to restrain livestock movement that might increase disease spreading.
  • Step 3: Goats and sheep can be vaccinated at their locations where officials will move from one village to another to reach more population.
  • Step 4: Training of personnel is important to ensure that vaccination is carried out before seasonal outbreaks and prevent the spread of disease.
  • Step 5: Commence campaigns one month prior to the season when outbreaks are most common or upon notice of a disease incidence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Livestock population with a potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_55_VaccinationCampaigns_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The objectives of vaccination campaigns are to reduce the number of animals that are affected by disease outbreaks and prevent treatable diseases from reducing national herd population which may affect farm income.
  • Awareness must be established in order to gain farmers trust and involvement for the campaign to be successful.

Drawbacks

  • No 100% guarantee of protection of animals/birds.
  • Postpone vaccination campaigns if an outbreak is in progress.
  • For ring vaccinations upon outbreaks, proper delineation of the perimeter is important.

Resistant Breeds

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Resistant breeds Disease resistance is the reduction of pathogen growth in or in a plant or animal; denoting less disease development in a particular breed than that which is relatively susceptible and is specific to a particular strain of disease or attribute. Breeding resistant breeds  . Resistance” means the animal actively fights infection by various means. Building resistant breeds can be done through selection. Selective breeding, sometimes called artificial selection, where different breeds of animals with desired characteristics or attributes like resistance to. drought, heat, cold, salinity, flood, submergence and pests can be developed by selective breeding and thus able to relatively thrive in some conditions which would otherwise not be able to, e.g. This assists in the reduction of diseases, results in healthier productive animals and reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. These breeds create a potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat or diary, and thus a climate smart attribute since by reducing emissions per unit of production (proportionately less faeces are dropped per unit consumption of feed) as well as contributing to food security.,. In the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region, local breeds are more resistant to many of the pests and diseases and may be the best option for some farmers in the Arid and semi-arid areas of the region.

Technical Application

To effectively implement resistant breeds:

  • Step 1: Breed livestock with increased resistance against pathogens or other environmental stressors (heat stress).
  • Step 2: Select animals of higher general disease resistance (resistance to several diseases) using a heritable indicator such as natural antibodies.
  • Step 3: Keep record of good performing animals; unhealthy or easily prone of weak animals should not be used for mating; males should be castrated leaving best specimen to breed in subsequent seasons.
  • Step 4: Breed or inseminate the selected cows with desired or selected bulls or semen of the desired traits.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease, results in healthier, more productive/efficient animals.
Increase Resilience
Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production, thus less GHG emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_54_ResistantBreeds_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • With resistant breeds, selecting of male breeds is a long-term climate smart adaptation because they are likely the most resistant.
  • Farmers should identify females in heat and isolate them with selected male animals. This results in productivity increase, higher resilience and cost effectiveness.

Drawbacks

  • Breeding should be controlled to achieve best practice results and farmers should be able to detect when female animals are on heat.
  • Parental performance records should be kept at all times.

Biological Control Vectors

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vectors are organisms that carry diseases from one living being to another without showing symptoms of the diseases themselves. Some of the most common forms of vectors are blood sucking insects such as mosquitos, fleas, lice, ticks and other similar insects, and rats/rodents. Places such as stagnant water and dumping sites can be ideal habitats for vectors to reside and transmit. The use of natural vector predators can help reduce or eliminate vector populations. The most common vectors in southern Africa are insects (tsetse flies-trypanosomiasis), animals (foot and mouth disease through cattle or people with contaminated shoes), tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF).  Sanitising the life-cycle of vectors, implementing pest traps and introducing pest predators are means of reducing the spread of disease. The impacts of climate change, especially increased heavy rainfall and higher temperatures can encourage vector populations to grow quicker than normal. Simple strategies to control vectors includes keeping livestock surroundings clean, avoiding livestock access to stagnant water, fencing areas off, restricting animal access to certain locations, can all control biological vectors and assist in reducing vector spread.

Technical Application

To effectively implement biological control vectors:

  • Step 1: Research common vectors in the local area and ensure that farmers are informed about the kinds, description, lifecycle and common habitats of these vectors, such as tsetse flies, ticks, biting flies.
  • Step 2: Avoid allowing livestock access to dirty and damp environments as well as very bushy areas as these locations are common habitats for vectors.
  • Step 3: Use of traps or even introduction of vector predators to livestock to manage vector spread could be used. This could include introducing epsilon traps for tsetse flies to promote vector control.
  • Step 4: If rodents are found in or around livestock, introduce rodent control methods such as traps and/or rodent predators (cats, etc) and bury any remains far from livestock areas.
  • Step 5: Fence off areas of high vector prevalence, such as stagnant water, ensuring that livestock do not access these areas.
  • Step 6: Examine any rangeland to determine whether there are vectors in the vicinity such as biting insect, or locusts that may damage maize crops and fruit flies that damage tomatoes.
  • Step 7: Community radio can be an effective method for extension officers to inform communities about outbreaks, or impending infestations.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_53_BiologicalControlVectors_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Identifying the common vectors in the area is a key first step to understanding how to manage them.
  • Using vector traps and introducing vector predators can also help manage livestock exposure.

Drawbacks

  • Biological vectors transport disease that can have devastating impacts on livestock.
Subscribe to Partly Irrigated

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported