Skip to main content

Water Spreading Bunds

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Water spreading bunds are barriers used on gradual slopes to slow down surface water and slow filter runoff, increasing the chance of infiltration, capturing runoff sediment, and decreasing soil erosion. Bunds can be built of different materials including packed earth or stones. Bunds can be spread across fields or used in micro-settings around individual trees or plants and should be applied in semi-arid or arid conditions. Bunds efficiently spread rainwater across the system and prevent streams from developing. Implementing bunds in areas with adequate rainfall or irrigation, may cause waterlogging and adversely affect crop growth.

Different types of bunds include:

  • Contour bunds: ridges of soil that follow slope contours and can be implemented at a large scale. Crops are cultivated between bunds.
  • Semi-circle bunds: ridges of varying size build in a half-moon or semi-circle. They are generally applied to rehabilitate rangelands and/or in the production of fodder.
  • Contour stone bunds: lines of stones laid in a shallow dug out areas that slow down the flow of runoff
Technical Application

To effectively Water Spreading Bunds the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Farmers should consider making earth bunds by hand, animal ploughs or mechanised ploughs.
  • Step 2: Contour bunds:
    • Contour lines must be plotted and marked prior to developing the bund.
    • A 40 cm deep infiltration pit is dug directly above where the bund will be plotted.
    • Bunds should be spread 5 m to 10 m apart.
    • Material from the infiltration pit will be piled and compacted to form a 25 cm to 30 cm in height with a base of 75 cm.
    • Soil is piled to form a ridge along the contour. The more significant the slope, the closer the bunds must be plotted.
  • Step 3: Semi-circle bunds:
    • Contour lines must be plotted and marked prior to developing the bund.
    • A centre point is chosen as diameter for the bund is selected (this could be 3 m or 30 m depending on the available space). From the centre point a string is used to stake out an even semi-circle.
    • Excavate a small trench before the bund and pile the excavated material. Pile and compact a bund wall, wetting it often to form the wall.
  • Step 4: Contour stone bunds:
    • Developed on less steep slopes.
    • Must have access to local stones.
    • Dig out a shallow ditch, 10 cm to 15 cm in depth.
    • Lay largest stones at the bottom of the ditch and pile smaller stone upward.
    • Step 5: Regular monitoring of bunds should take place, especially after rain events or after significant periods of time. Repairs should be done if any damage is found.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces soil erosion and enables farmers to maintain agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
Reduces soil erosion in higher rainfall environments, especially relevant as climates change.
Additional Information
  • The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 1991. Water Harvesting. Rome, Italy.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_28_waterSpreading_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Water spreading bunds are implemented on slopes of varying degrees to slow the flow of surface water, increasing infiltration and nutrient capture.
  • Bunds capture water and spread it across an area more evenly, preventing streams, erosion channels and gullies from forming at depression points.

Drawbacks

  • Developing bunds can be laborious.
  • Bunds in areas with adequate rainfall or irrigation may cause waterlogging and affect crop growth.

Half Moon Pits

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Half-moon Pits are water harvesting techniques that assists crop growth in harsh climatic conditions, improving water and nutrient availability, promoting biodiversity and restoring the fertility of the degraded soil. The technique is similar to Zai pits in terms of its purpose. Half-moons are semi-circular wide-open basins used to collect runoff water. The mouth of the half-moons must face a slope where rainwater will flow during precipitation events. Water will be trapped in the pit to irrigate crops. Stones are used to support the half-moon curve to avoid being washed away during rain. The amount of fertilisers required in farming systems decreases when this technique is adopted by farmers. Areas with lots of rainfall are not suitable for this technique as it may lead to water logging effect.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Half-moon techniques, the following steps should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Farmers should consider the diameter of the half-moon  between 2 m – 3 m, with a total surface area of approximately 1.5 sqm and 3.5 sqm.
  • Step 2: Pits should be dug to a depth of between 15 cm to 30 cm.
  • Step 3: Excavated material can be piled around the curved section of the half-moon.
  • Step 4: The curved section of the half-moon can be reinforced by stones to prevent washouts of the half-moon.
  • Step 5: 35 kg of organic fertilisers/compost should be evenly distributed in the half-moon.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Half moon pits support water and nutrient availability, in turn promoting agricultural productivity, especially in harsh climates.
Increase Resilience
Retaining soil water and nutrients supports agricultural productivity.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_27_HalfMoons_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Pits are left to sit while fertiliser/compost material converts to productive soil material.
  • Half-moons allow for nutrient concentration and water infiltration that provides improved conditions for crops to grow.
  • Land that was previously degraded can become productive through the implementation of half-moons.

Drawbacks

Implementing half-moons is very laborious and takes significant people power to implement.

Zai Pits

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Zai pits are based on a traditional technology approach originating from West Africa that assists farmers working on marginal and degraded land. This approach involves the concentration and conservation of nutrients and water at the crop root systems through the digging of small pits (Zai pits) and filling them with compost, with the aim of increasing soil fertility and water infiltration. Zai pits are dug between planting season and filled with organic fertilisers/composts, which attract worms, termites and other insects, creating mix of material that can be used to fertilise crops. Farmers plant crops directly in these pits, prior to rains and water will infiltrate the pits more easily than the surrounding soil. Applying this technology is laborious to implement, but it  has been found to assist farmers in times of drought or in arid conditions to produce successful crops by maximising the resources available. Zai pits allow for mitigation of desertification in degraded land and an economic use of resources in conditions of scarcity, especially in resource constrained environments

Technical Application

To effectively implement Zai Pits the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Zai pits should be dug with a diameter of 30 cm to 40 cm and 10 cm to 15 cm deep. 
  • Step 2: Pits should be spaced 70 cm to 80 cm apart resulting in approximately 10,000 pits per hectare.
  • Step 3: The farmer should place 2 – 3 handfuls (200 g to 600 g) of organic fertilisers or compost in each pit.
  • Step 4: Holes that are dug between planting seasons will trap wind eroded soils, which are fertile and form good soils for plating crops.
  • Step 5: It is recommended that 3 tonnes of fertiliser/compost per hectare be available.
  • Step 6: Farmers should consider planting crops in these pits prior to periods of rain.
  • Step 7: Repeated application of Zai pit technology on an annual basis will increase productivity of degraded land in the long term.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased soil fertility from zai pit implementation improves agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
This approach to fertilising crops and enhancing nutrient content can aid adaptation, especially in arid and semi-arid climates.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_26_ZaiPits_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Earth that is excavated from the hole dug can be used to form a ridge around each pit to help capture and retain water.
  • Zai pit technology can be applied to marginal or degraded land or in semi-arid to arid conditions to allow farmers to rehabilitate soil/land and productively grow crops.
  • Zai pits allow for nutrient concentration and water infiltration that provides improved conditions for crops to grow.
  • Land that was previously degraded can become productive through the use of zai pits.

Drawbacks

  • Implementing zai pits is laborious and takes significant people power to implement – but may be the only option in marginal environments.

In Field Water Harvesting

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

In-field water harvesting is the practice of increasing water infiltration and moisture retention in the soil. The agricultural technique involves the collection of rainwater runoff from fields that is collected and stored for future needs. This water can be stored in infiltration pits and later used to water the same crops, other crops through an irrigation system (usually high value crops, including fruit trees), or used for domestic purposes. Factors like soil, water, and plant type influence the effectiveness and productivity of rainwater harvesting. This type of water harvesting is generally implemented in areas of very low rain (semi-arid) conditions. In-field water harvesting entails establishing micro-catchments at the farm scale, where sloped areas have been cleared or cropped to direct rainwater to the water storage area (a pit that has been dug to store/hold water). Utilising strip cropping to growing crops while providing a method for directing rain is sometime practiced. The soil type has a limiting factor in collecting in-field water due the infiltration rates. In-field water harvesting saves rainfall water that can be used over a longer period than during and immediately after a rainfall event, reduces the risks of crop failure due to no or limited rainfall, and increases rain water productivity.

Technical Application

To effectively In Field Water Harvesting techniques, the following steps should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Land is cleared, berms are developed, and crops are planted in order to direct water to the infiltration point.
  • Step 2: The catchment areas should be sloped no more than 5 % and the area should be cleared to promote catchment as much as possible.
  • Step 3: The infiltration pit (where water is stored) should be dug at the lowest point of the catchment areas and line infiltration pits with plastic or concrete roofing to limit water loss, and can be used as a source of irrigation for fruit trees and other high value crops.
  • Step 4: Paths can be built of soil to guide water to the infiltration pit.
  • Step 5: Alley cropping, or strop cropping can be used, with areas between trees and crops dug deeper like a trough to direct water to the infiltration pit.
  • Step 6: To access water from infiltration pits, farmers can introduce a pumping system and water can be distributed around the farm as necessary
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Water is available to plants when it is needed. Reduced nutrient leaching.
Increase Resilience
Mitigate dry spells.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Can lock more carbon in the soil. More efficient use of fertilisers.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_25_InFieldWaterHarvesting_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Harvested water used in irrigation systems.
  • In-field water harvesting saves rainfall water that can be used over a longer.
  • Reduces the risks of crop failure due to no or limited rainfall.
  • Increases rainwater productivity.

Drawbacks

  • Major issues with a dug-out infiltration pit is evaporation and seepage. Evaporation can be combated by the addition of mulch to water and seepage can be prevented by including some kind of liner (plastic sheet, concrete, etc.). In addition, large plastic, steel or concrete container can be built or sunk below surface to prevent major seepage. Roofs can be built over infiltration pounds or built containers to limit the loss of water to evaporation.

Drip Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Drip irrigation is a method of slow delivery of water to crops, through highly-controlled flow management, applied along the soil or at the sub-surface level directly to crop root systems. Drip irrigation is an effective system for conserving water while ensuring that it is used optimally without losing it to evaporation through high efficiency water delivery. Drip irrigation involves establishing a network of tubes, values and pipes connected to water source by a pump, along crop rows. A water source is required which is a drawback as many dryland areas lack these water sources. Drip irrigation is a climate smart option as it increases farmer resilience to the effects of climate change.

Technical Application

To effectively implement drip irrigation:

  • Step 1: A reliable water source must be available - natural (natural or through rain-water harvesting).
  • Step 2: Acquire a pump system (approximately $US 100) that maintains enough pressure to deliver water through the system or an elevated tank.
  • Step 3: Connect lines or hoses and laterals that run from the pump system across the planted fields.
  • Step 4: Run lines or hoses with emitters (drippers) or small punctures at the surface level along planted crops or just below the surface providing water to the roots system of the plants.
  • Step 5: Once the system is operable, the pump can be turned on and water dispersed as required by the nature of the crop and can also be implemented with supplemental irrigation strategies (Technical Brief 23).
  • Step 6: Monitor the irrigation system regularly to ensure there are no malfunctions and the system is maintained. Crops that receive regular water can develop shallow root systems and any prolonged disruptions in service could have   significant impacts.
  • Step 7: If applying drip irrigation in sloped conditions, follow the contours of the slope as outlined in Technical Brief 16.

Once a drip irrigation system is up and running, farmers can explore fertigation, the addition of soluble fertilisers into the irrigation system water for distribution directly to plants.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Energy saving.
Increase Resilience
Increase crop yield.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Continued production in changing environments.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_24_DripIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Maximises efficiency in crop irrigation in dryland or variable climate conditions.
  • Minimizes the loss of water to evaporation.

Drawbacks

  • Requires consistent water source.
  • Costs of establishing the system, pump and lines/hoses can be significant depending on configuration, etc.
  • Requires continual monitoring and may need regular maintenance.

Supplemental Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Supplemental irrigation (SI) , also referred to as  Deficit Irrigation, is the application of water below full crop-water requirements, generally in drylands to assist crop growth in areas that experience low rainfall (300-500 mm/year). Supplemental irrigation involves adding limited amounts of water to rainfed crops to improve and stabilise yields when rainfall is insufficient for plant growth. Supplemental irrigation is a valuable and sustainable production strategy in dry regions or when experiencing irregular climatic conditions. This practice requires understanding of the yield response to water and the economic impact of loss in harvest. The aim of this technique is to ensure that the minimum amount of water is available during critical stages of crop growth.

Technical Application

To effectively undertake deficit irrigation:

  • Step 1: Determine critical growth cycle of desired crops.
  • Step 2: Experiment with SI strategies to determine critical watering times prior to upscaling.
  • Step 3: Strict management is required to determine the level of transpiration deficiency allowable without significant reduction in crop yields.
  • Step 4: Farmers capable of implementing deficit irrigation must have access to the minimum required water to implement deficit irrigation.
  • Step 5: Farmers must have access to a reliable water source, irrigation systems, including water distribution system, sprinklers and/or drip irrigation system.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Stabilises yield.
Increase Resilience
Adapts to real time rainfall conditions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_23_SupplementalIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increase crop production in dry areas or those experiencing drought.
  • Assist farmers manage crops at optimal times (low rainfall).

Drawbacks

  • Farmers must have access to enough water to meet minimum water requirements.
  • Require water distribution system that is functional.
  • Close management of crops to ensure that SI is implemented at critical crop production moments.

Solar Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Solar irrigation systems utilise solar energy to pump water to fields and distribute it through drip irrigation or other systems. Solar irrigation is a low-emission agricultural technology that replaces fossil fuel irrigation pumps reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This approach has the potential to reduce energy costs for irrigation and provide energy independence in rural areas. It provides opportunities to increase productivity by shifting from rainfed to irrigated agriculture in some areas. Solar irrigation systems require intensive management and regular monitoring to ensure the sustainable use of water resources. It requires maintenance of solar panels and irrigation equipment but can quickly yield a positive return on investment. Solar irrigation can be implemented for crop irrigation and livestock watering schemes and can improve food security, produce high value crops for sale, reduce energy costs and drive rural development. Although an expensive technology, solar irrigation can introduce significant operational savings if managed and maintained appropriately. It is considered a climate smart option as it can increase productivity, enable farms to adapt t climate changes and improve resilience, and the use of solar power reduces the use of on-grid, or diesel generator power, reducing emissions.

Technical Application

To effectively implement solar irrigation:

  • Step 1: To determine the solar pump system Crop water requirements, location, water sources etc. Do required research. Is water sourced from an above ground or below ground source?
  • Step 2: Source required materials to implement a solar irrigation system from regional or international suppliers including:
    • Photovoltaic (PV) panels to generate electricity (80-300 W system depending on context);
    • a structure to mount the panels;
    • a pump controller;
    • a surface or submersible water pump; and
    • a distribution system or storage tank for water.
  • Step 3: Identify funding sources as initial costs, as well as maintenance costs, must be considered and modelled prior to purchasing a system. There are regional and international solar irrigation producers.   These costs differ dramatically given the complexity of the context, starting at costs approximately USD $2,400 for equipment only. If drilling is necessary the cost increases significantly depending on depth, substrate etc.  Community-based investment, micro-leasing and rental services can be possible funding models to explore.
  • Step 4: Determine whether there is sufficient solar irradiation for the proposed area – consult and specialist; and/or the national meteorological service.
  • Step 5: Identify area suitable to install solar panels. The area should be easily accessible, and all trees/bush should be cleared. To determine most appropriate site and angle of panels, etc, consult an expert.
  • Step 6: The availability of technical expertise must be considered before implementation to ensure that any technical issues do not result in long period of service disruption.

Maintenance costs and expertise should be considered before installing solar irrigation systems. A detailed cost benefit analysis is advisable. Other key technical considerations include: Legal permits to extract water from the source as water extraction may impact community watershed levels.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Plants get enough water. Potential for two or more cropping seasons per year.
Increase Resilience
Predictable yields. Higher production equals increased food security/income and resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Significant reductions in CO2 emissions compared to grid and diesel-fuelled systems.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_22_SolarIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Energy independence will introduce significant cost savings for farmers.
  • Solar powered irrigation can significantly boost productivity, due to increased ability to sustainably irrigate crops.
  • Consistent irrigation can help to mitigate climate impacts, and aid adaptation.
  • Reduces operational costs for diesel or on-grid power to pump water.
  • Reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

Drawbacks

  • Solar irrigation is expensive to implement and there are costs for maintenance. Therefore, savings or access to credit will be required.
  • Access to solar equipment, spares and parts, and the transportation of the above may be complicated and/or expensive.
  • Over and above cost and access technology, other issues such as access to land and water sources are important factors.

Terracing

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Topography
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Altitudinal Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Terraces are cross-slope barriers that have been cut into slopes offering surfaces that are flat or slightly sloped. Terraces are designed to minimise erosion and increase the infiltration of runoff water. In addition, terracing allows for a maximum of area for farming and cropping by cutting into slopes, creating steps on a hillside. Riser walls are retained by growing trees or grasses, using stones or compacted soil to manage runoff and ensure stability. Terracing involves significant planning and labour to implement and maintain. Labour should be coordinated and planned to ensure that terracing is not carried out in an ad hoc manner, and labour to maintain the terraces is available annually. Terracing is suited to areas with severe erosion hazards, deep soils, on slopes that do not exceed 25 degrees and are not too stony. Community action is often required, as terracing is a landscape-level solution that can only be implemented if all parties agree and convert slopes together. Implementing individual terraces or terraced sections can negatively impact the entire hillside.

Technical Application

To effectively approach to terracing construction:

  • Step 1: Measure slope angle – should not exceed 25 degrees and soils should be at least 0.5 metres deep.
  • Step 2: Plot the contours – see Technical Brief 16 Contour Planting for instructions for staking-out contours, and the diagram below for use of a t-stick to measure the distance between contours.
  • Step 3: Start at the lowest terrace. Dig a trench vertically below the next contour, and then dig outwards to the lowest contour. Remove soil and place downhill below the lowest contour.
  • Step 4: Compact soil on constructed terrace.
  • Step 5: Work should then progress upslope, emptying top-soil on to the terrace below to provide soil for planting.
  • Step 6: Strengthen riser buttress walls (back-walls) with stones, compacted soil, or by planting grass or trees.
  • Step 7: Terrace-end drainage should also be considered, so water does not pool too heavily. The down-field gutters can be lined with stones to reduce erosion

Detailed diagrams and tables for calculating terrace dimensions are provided in Peace Corps 1986, Soil conservation techniques for hillside farming.

Additional guidance can be sought from videos provided by Access Agriculture: SLM02 Fanya Juu terraces. The Kenyan example provided is also up-slope terrace construction but using a different method where a trench is dug, and the loose topsoil is thrown up-hill (fanya juu in Kiswahili) which forms a ridge that flattens over time.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Stable slopes are a critical element of maintaining agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
Terraces enhance slope stability and reduce soil erosion in the face of changing climates, with changing temperature and rainfall regimes.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_18_Terracing_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Terracing prevents erosion and can act as a rainfed irrigation system.
  • Terracing is a labourious process to implement and takes significant effort to maintain.

Drawbacks

  • Requires professional advice on implementing terracing.
  • If implemented incorrectly, can have negative impacts including more erosion than without terracing.

Contour Planting

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Contour Planting is a planting strategy for sloping fields, where crop rows follow slope contours rather than planting in rows up- and down-slope. The primary aim of this strategy is to slow the downhill flow of water and encourage the infiltration of water into the soil. Slowing the flow of runoff water reduces soil erosion and therefore also nutrient loss.

Contour Ridges are created by tilling, ploughing or hoeing soil to establish ridges along contour lines, acting as a barrier to downhill water runoff and other erosive processes - the higher the ridge height, the more effective the barrier is to preventing soil erosion.

Contour Strips involves use of vegetative barriers e.g. planting of strips of grass or hedges and other species to secure soil and further prevent erosion. These practices are labour intense and require extension support, especially as contour lines are not straight but follow slope characteristics, correctly identifying contour lines is important and can be done using the ‘low-technology’ options that are identified in the Technical Application section of this Technical Brief.

Technical Application

To effectively undertake contour planting:

  • Step 1: Construct an A-frame that has a plumb-line with a rock hanging down the centre. The base of the A-frame should be 90 cm.
  • Step 2: Calibrate the A-frame on flat ground. Ensure that both legs are on the ground. Mark where the plumb line meets the cross bar.
  • Step 3: On a slope, working perpendicular to the slope, plant one leg of the A-frame and swing the other leg around until the plumb line meets the mark on the cross bar. Drive a stake into the ground where the first ‘planted’ leg is and continue the process across the slope.
  • Step 4: Once the extent of the contour has been staked, tie a string from post-to-post across the slope; this identifies the contour to be planted.
  • Step 5: Plant selected crops, develop contour ridges or plant contour strips along the contour line.
  • Step 6: Subsequent contours should be spaced 3-5 m up or downhill of the preceding contour line. To determine the length between contour lines, measure off the top of each stake to a stake up or downhill with a tape measure or accurately measured third stick.
  • Step 7: Contour ridges can be implemented like Water Spreading Bunds (Technical Brief 28) to form ridges of soil that are formed by tilling or ploughing and can be left after land preparation to further prevent erosive forces. Crops can be planted between these ridges.
  • Step 8: The planting of contour strips can be implemented by planting grasses or hedges 20 m (shallow slopes) to 10 m (steeper slopes) apart up or downhill, similar to Trash Lines (Technical Brief 14). This intercropping allows for erosion control and can be used as fodder for livestock.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Retaining soil structure enables farmers, particularly those planting on sloping fields to maintain productivity.
Increase Resilience
This land management practice aid farmers to maintain soil structure in the face of changing climates and shifting rainfall patterns.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_16_ContourPlanting_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Contour planting prevents erosion on sloped fields and efficiently trap runoff water.
  • Contour planting improved water infiltration and contour ridges improve water retention.
  • Contour planting can be integrated with intercropping contour strips of grass or hedges to help maintain soil structure.

Drawbacks

  • Contour lines are extremely labour intensive and take a significant amount of time to implement.
  • During contour measuring and development, land may be exposed to erosive forces.

Trash Lines

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Trash lines are the incorporation of lines of organic materials spread across contours of hilly agricultural fields - strips of heaped straw or weed materials that have been collected during primary cultivation of the land. Trash lines have been found to direct runoff in field and act as an erosion control method. Through decomposition, the trash line material acts as a type of compost adding nutrients to the soil, adding more organic material year on year, should the farmer continue to build this line. This is a climate smart approach as it contributes to soil health, capturing more nutrients and carbon in the soil, and in turn promoting sustainable agricultural productivity. In changing climates, implementation of this practice can contribute to adaptation strategies.

Technical Application

To effectively undertake trash lines:

  • Step 1: Collect straw, stalks, picked weed or other organic materials from field or surrounding area.
  • Step 2: Establish contour lines using method identified in contour planting (Technical Brief 16).
  • Step 3: Contour lines for trash lines should be spaced between 5 to 10 m apart.
  • Step 4: Heap straw along contour lines on hilly or sloped fields to be approximately 0.5 m wide and up to 0.3 m in height.
  • Step 5: Trash should be piled on annually or as the field is prepared. Lines can be maintained for a few years and then decomposed materials can be mixed into the soil.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Contribute to soil health and therefore agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
In changing climates, strategies such as this can contribute to retain and improving soil health.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Helps retain carbon in soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_14_Trashlines_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Low cost option for soil and water conservation on sloped fields.
  • Increase of organic materials in fields.
  • Green manure (Technical Brief 02) production in the field.

Drawbacks

  • Increased workload to implement trash lines but low effort to maintain.
Subscribe to Neutral

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported