Skip to main content

Crop Variety Selection

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Selecting crop varieties is a key resilience strategy for farmers facing changing climatic conditions. There are two types of seed varieties: traditional varieties and improved varieties. Traditional varieties have been selected by farmers for their special characteristics and due to many years of selecting the strongest seeds over generations, they are generally adapted to local natural conditions. In some respects, these seeds increase the chance of getting a return on investment in stable environments, but are less likely to mitigate GHG emissions. Traditional crop varieties are usually selected by small scale farmers due to their relatively low cost and availability and can be saved and replanted for further growing seasons. Improved varieties are seeds that have been altered by scientific processes to incorporate desired characteristics using techniques such as following pure line breeding, classical breeding, hybridisation and molecular breeding. Desirable characteristics include higher yields, shorter growing seasons, drought resistance, salt tolerance, etc. Improved varieties are selected when facing adverse conditions such as higher temperatures and/or less predictable rainfall and normally result in the efficient use of water reducing use of energy for irrigation systems. While these seeds offer improvements they are usually commercial products and as a result can be expensive. Furthermore, as they are sold by seed companies availability is driven by demand. Most seed companies protect enhancements using  intellectual property rights that legally limit seed saving and replanting of seeds. In fact, many of these seed varieties have been designed to prevent plants to be reseeded. Thus, seed varieties afford farmers the opportunity to incorporate crops that can be planted to exploit their unique characteristics – traditional or improved, assisting farmers to grow crops that are resilient to changing climates to produce crops that are market-appropriate.

Technical Application

To effectively undertake leverage traditional seed characteristics, or improved crop varieties  the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Prior to selecting seed varieties, perform a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) to identify how crops will perform and their benefits compared to the costs of the seed, considering the following:
    • Local  farming system(s): land availability per household, crops traditionally grown, access to inputs such as fertilisers,
    • Local environmental conditions: soil conditions, disease, pests, climatic conditions, occurrence of flooding/droughts and other natural disasters.
    • How climate change has impacted or will impact the farming system and how crop variety selection can be a climate- smart practice.
    • Local access to seeds – is seed collected at the householder level, do neighbours exchange seeds, do farmers have access to commercially produced seeds?  Are the costs for accessing commercial, improved seeds manageable or prohibitive? The CBA should weigh the benefits of a new seed against perceived actual or transactional costs for selecting a new seed.
  • Step 2: Obtain information and guidance from local experts, lead farmers, and government regarding best varieties to grow.
  • Step 3: Evaluate results of the CBA and select appropriate seeds that match the farm system/requirements, and available financial resources/access to credit.
  • Step 4: Plant test plots of selected seeds to understand if benefits are realised and demonstrate outcomes with farmers, showing possible alternatives and discuss implementation.
  • Step 5: Following full demonstration and discussion with farmers, implement at farm level – planting the first crop in accordance with guidance provided by seed provider, or traditional knowledge.

Consider in-country seed sources to access different varieties through local extension or research services. When buying seeds ensure that the seeds are adequately dry and look for seed that is certified by a national seed laboratory to ensure that the variety is the highest quality possible. Seeds should be properly stored to avoid high temperatures and humid air to reduce chances of early germination.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Selecting improved seed varieties allows the farmer to maintain agricultural productivity as the climate changes.
Increase Resilience
Selection of improved varieties may assist farmers adapt agricultural production to assist adaptation to climate change.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_20_CropVarietySelection_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Exploring crop variety is a key way for farmers to grow more resilient crops within the context of changing climatic conditions. Drought resistant or faster maturing varieties, for example, allow you to respond to reduced rainfall conditions.
  • Improved crop varieties have been altered by scientific processes to incorporate desired characteristics.
  • Understanding local context is important when researching the best crop variety for the area.

Drawbacks

  • Improved crop varieties are commercially sold and can be expensive as they often require additional inputs (inorganic fertilisers etc.)
  • Traditional crops have generally adapted to local climatic and landscape conditions, are widely available and are cost effective for local populations; however, these varieties may not be resilient to climatic changes, and are less likely to mitigate GHG emissions.

Agroforestry: Alley Cropping

Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Agroforestry is a land management practice that combines the planting and management of trees and shrubs with crops and pasture, providing benefits of soil health, crop yields, resilience to climate change, biodiversity and economic opportunities. Agroforestry encompasses numerous practices, including silvo-pasture, agro-silvo cultural, and agro-silvo-pastural. One successful agro-silvo-cultural practice is alley cropping, where the farmer plants rows of trees, shrubs or hedges between crop rows. Usually hedges comprise leguminous plants intended to fix nitrogen in the soil and provide leaf litter and prunable biomass. The hedges are pruned with the pruned material spread on the ground, to reduce shading and competition with the primary crop. Timing of pruning is important to ensure that the pruned biomass releases nutrients to the soil at a time when the primary crop needs them for maximum crop productivity; e.g. when alley-cropping maize, the pruned biomass needs to breakdown with and release beneficial nutrients into soil from two and eight weeks after planting the maize crop. This approach has proven to be highly successful, with examples in Malawi where gliricidia was alley-cropped with maize where the prunings created a three-fold increase in maize production, which was increased a further 29 % when fertilisers were added. This fertilisation could be achieved with green manure, and other climate smart soil amendment approaches. The space and number of hedge rows to primary crop is dependent upon the field size and the regular growth height of the shrub/hedge. The hedge must not be planted so close that it shades the primary crop. In larger fields, larger deep-rooted timber trees can be planted between groups of rows of primary crop, providing soil benefits, reducing wind-speeds/erosion, and providing timber products.

This approach is considered climate smart as it increases productivity, provides a mechanism for more climate resilient farming, whilst increasing soil carbon levels.

Technical Application

While agroforestry practices are deemed highly beneficial and climate smart, it is important to ensure that proposed practices are appropriate for the specific context – the benefits of the agroforestry practice match the needs of the farmer - and are fit for purpose. Obtain advice from an agroforestry expert before embarking on secondary crop/hedge species selection.

To effectively implement alley-cropping the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Clearly understand the objectives of the intervention and identify an appropriate species for intercropping. For maize and sorghum in a smaller subsistence farm setting, selection and growth of hedge rows of a legumes such as cowpea or Gliricidia can provide sustainable benefits in terms of soil quality and secondary fodder/food products. In larger fields, timber trees can be planted every five to ten crop rows, depending on the height of the mature tree, and the shade-tolerance of the crop.
  • Step 2: Identify and understand key conditions, such as prevailing wind direction, and sunlight to ensure that the field is planted in an appropriate configuration, with primary crop and secondary (hedge/shrub/tree) crops planted in such a way as to benefit the primary crop and not compete with it. East to west row orientation should maxmise sunlight, topography permitting.
  • Step 3: For beneficial hedgerow growth with legume species such as Leucaena, cliricidia, and Sesbania sesban, the trees should be planted in rows between two and four metres apart, with individual trees planted as close as possible - between 10 to 15 cm apart. If planted closely, the trees will favour leaves over step growth, creating more mulch to prune for cover. Note that if rows are planted too closely, the secondary crop can dominate the available crop land reducing productivity. Furthermore, the closer the hedges, the more shade will present, which can depress crop growth, and also start to compete for soil water and nutrients, which is not beneficial.
  • Step 4: Once reaching sufficient maturity, after approximately six months (one-metre tall for legumes)– hedges should be pruned to generate mulch for working into the soil. Then the primary crop (maize) can be planted. Pruning once per month thereafter provides cover and ensures that light penetration is maintained. Planting legumes approximately six months before planting the primary crop can ensure that sufficient pruned material is available to incorporate into the soil to enhance growth.
  • Step 5: After harvesting the primary crop, hedgerows can be left to grow taller so that shade reduces weed grown, and to develop material to prune and incorporate into the soil again during the following crop cycle. However, hedges should not be allow to grow too high or dense as their roots will dominate the soil and out-compete primary crops for water and nutrients.

Before implementing any of these technologies, further research may be required beyond the guidance provided here. The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) has many resources, toolkits and success stories that can support such research.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Alley cropping and pruning of leguminous hedges increases productivity of primary crops such as maize.
Increase Resilience
Helps farmers to be more resilient to climate change, by sustaining productivity and controlling soil health, especially when faced with changing climates.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The planting of alley hedge rows of legumes and the introduction of pruned material contributes more carbon to the soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_17_AgroForestry_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Trees, shrubs, and hedges are incorporated into farming systems and have many different biophysical and socio-economic benefits.
  • Use of leguminous hedges no only provides pruned materials to provide cover, but they also help fix nitrogen in the soil.
  • Hedges planted in alleys can also provide other benefits such as edible seed pods for human or animal consumption.
  • Hedges and trees can reduce soil erosion from run-off or wind erosion.
  • Alley cropping can provide opportunities for diversified income – selling secondary crops and/or timber.
  • Alley cropped timber trees can provide building materials fire wood.

Drawbacks

  • Initial labour requirements will likely be significant; however, this will be primarily at the earlier stages of the intervention.
  • Ongoing maintenance such as pruning and maintenance of hedges will be needed, although relatively minimal.
  • There may be some costs involved in obtaining hedge seedlings.
  • Use of trees rather than hedges and shrubs introduces more labour, but yields more benefits.

Erosion Control

Value Chain
Topography
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Erosion control measures are practices designed to reduce runoff water and wind erosion that wash away top soil and nutrients, degrading soil biodiversity and reducing agricultural productivity. Erosion is a natural, biophysical process resulting from rainfall, water flows, wind, or storm runoff. Erosion is integral to the formation of soils, however human and animal activity, including agriculture and clearing of land, can accelerate erosive processes, drastically impacting landscapes, soils (e.g. quality) and watercourses. In addition, erosion control measures can contribute to reducing rainfall runoff, increased water infiltration into the soil, and attenuates flooding. The intensity of rainfall is directly correlated with the severity of soil erosion; hence, this is a significant problem across the Southern African region as much of the rainfall in the region is episodic, and intense. To prevent or reduce erosive processes control measures can be incorporated into farming systems to reduce or reverse degradation and potentially restore or improve soil quality. Erosion control measures aim to mitigate soil erosion and improve soil fertility by reducing flow and speed of run-off to avoid soil being washed away. Erosion control can be initiated through a number of interventions, including, but not limited to, intercropping (e.g. planting cover crops), mulch, conservation tillage and reforestation, as well as terracing, soil bunds, etc.. Example: Stone Bunds. Lessons learned from West Africa show that stone bunds constructed along contour lines in fields and in key run-off locations can significantly reduce run-off, particularly in steeper agricultural fields. The stone lines reinforce the soil structure in the field following the contours of the land, reducing the speed and volume of run-off, thereby reducing the likelihood of erosion. This is an appropriate technology to implement on slopes up to 15 to 20 degrees. This is considered a climate smart practice as it maintains soil structure and nutrients, in turn retaining carbon in soil, enabling farmers to adapt to climate changes and sustain agricultural productivity.

Technical Application

Without a topographic survey, this technology may require trial and error to begin with, to see how rainfall and run-off responds to the contouring. To effectively implement erosion control measures the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Perform a thorough local study of the landscape, soils, land use and erosive processes that most impact the area: steep slopes, flood plains, high winds etc.
  • Step 2: Source a large number of stones, preferably five to ten centimetres square blocks (from a quarry) or five to ten-centimetre diameter cobbles (from a river-bed). You will need 30 to 50 tonnes of stone per hectare for contour bunds approximately 300 metres long.
  • Step 3: Mark out contours, as discussed in Technical Brief 16 Contour Planting.
  • Step 4: In larger fields with shallower slopes, place stones in rows of two along contour line, interlocking alternately, burying the lower half. The bunds can be between 25 and 40 metres apart. On steeper slopes, stack and bury stones against or in vertical/near vertical walls of contours much closer together (five to ten metres apart) to reinforce them.
  • Step 5: Make sure that stone bunds follow the contours from one side of the field to the other, ensuring that no ‘pour’ points (larger gaps) exist along the way, lining the drainage channel or weir from one contour to the next with stones to avoid or reduce scouring in these locations.
  • Step 6: Following, and if possible, during rainfall events, check the stability of the slope, adjusting stone bunds where necessary.
  • Step 7: At the end of the rainy season and again following harvest, review the performance of the technology, and prepare for the next growing season.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased water infiltration can extend growing period and mitigates short dry spells. Can reduce flood risk downstream.
Increase Resilience
Increased production due to improved nutrient availability and higher nutrient use efficiency.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Depending on practices used, may lock more carbon into the soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_11_ErosionControl_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Erosion control measures prevent the loss of top soils and nutrients.
  • Can help farmers adapt to changes in climate that have include increased rainfall amounts and intensity.
  • Can reduce the impact of wind erosion.

Drawbacks

  • Erosion is a natural process that can be increased due to human and animal activity.
  • Requires substantial labour inputs to construct bunds and other erosion control measures
  • Maintenance is also needed.

No Tillage

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

No-tillage or reduced-tillage farming involves growing crops without ploughing or reducing the use of machinery in preparing fields for planting. Excessive tillage can have major impacts on soils and the environment including loss of organic matter and soil organisms, increased soil erosion and pesticide runoff, reduced soil fertility, loss of soil structure, etc. Thus, implementing no- or reduced-tillage can help farmers in conserving soil quality and in many cases, increase crop production.

In implementing no-tillage processes, land is not or is minimally disturbed and crop residues are normally left on the soil surface with minimal use of implements. Reduced tillage practices include technological changes such as using more efficient ploughing tools and/or implementing strip-till, zone-till or ridge-till processes. Most reduced tillage systems are implemented in conjunction with cover crops and mulches to protect soil structure.  Tilling by hand or animal means are considered reduced tillage methods.

The adoption of no or reduced tillage practices reduces the amount of fossil fuels consumed by farmers and increases carbon sequestration as soil carbon is not exposed or released in the atmosphere and is thus a climate smart practice.

Technical Application

Switching to no-till or reduced tillage should be planned at least a year in advance so preparations can be made necessary implements can be obtained. Implements should match farm labour availability. You will also need to decide if no till or reduced tillage methods are appropriate based on farm area and desired crops, and start with a small area to determine feasibility. Cereal and legume crops are suitable for no tillage while vegetables and other crops often require some tillage – i.e. reduced tillage.

There are two forms of no-tillage, conventional and organic. Conventional no-tillage includes the application of herbicides to manage weeds, prior to and after planting. Organic no-tillage does not incorporate the use of herbicides, but includes other methods for controlling weeds, including cover crops, crop rotation and free-range livestock. Organic no-tillage is more suitable as it assists mitigate any climate change impacts on the farm.

No till

  • Step 1: Prepare fields using conventional (herbicide application) or organic processes include cover crop (Technical Brief 15) and crop rotation (Technical Brief 09).
  • Step 2: Test soils – aiming to balance nutrient and pH levels. In the case of acidic soils, add small amounts of lime each year.
  • Step 3: Avoid soils with bad drainage, as they become water-logged.
  • Step 4: Level the soil surface, removing uneven areas to assist even seed planting.
  • Step 5: Eliminate soil compaction.

Reduced Till

  • Step 1: This approach is similar to regular tillage, but with significantly less disturbance of the soil. Tilling is only done where needed, and the rest of the soil is undisturbed.
  • Step 2: Strip-tillage or zone-tillage involves tilling and seeding in 15 cm strips leaving areas in-between undisturbed.
  • Step 3: Ridge-tillage involves preparing ridges post-harvest and letting them settle over time to be planted the next seeding period; with ridges not more than 60 cm apart.

More information of each of these specific practices should be sought prior to implementation.

Crop rotation is a complimentary farming method when practicing no-tillage, as it promotes maximum biomass levels for permanent mulch cover, while controlling weeds (with pre- and post-emergent herbicides), pests, and diseases, as well as improving soil nutrition and fertility.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Improved soil structure and increased microbial and invertebrate activity in the soil makes nutrients more available to plants.
Increase Resilience
Increased water infiltration and soil biodiversity mitigates the effects of short-term dry spells.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Locks more carbon in the soil. Reduced ‘passes’ in mechanised systems reduces fuel inputs required.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_12_No%20Tillage_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increased soil fertility, organic matter and soil structure, and beneficial organisms (earthworms, etc).
  • Reduced compaction of soils.
  • Prevention of soil erosion.
  • Reduction in fossil fuel consumption.
  • Increased soil carbon sequestration.

Drawbacks

  • A positive response can be delayed for up to three years.
  • Effective weed management may require the application of herbicides.
  • Possible decreases in crop productivity if not carried out effectively.

Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM)

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) refers to a set of agricultural practices that can be applied simultaneously to improve agricultural productivity through increasing soil nutrients and improving crop water use. ISFM includes a broad range of agricultural practices that have all been adapted to local conditions to improve soil nutrients and include the combined application of the following approaches:

  1. Utilisation of organic fertilisers such as green manure, compost and crop residues.
  2. Application of locally available soil amendment methods, such as lime and biochar.
  3. Implementation of techniques like germplasm, agroforestry, crop rotation, intercropping etc.
  4. Limited use of inorganic or mineral fertilisers – seen as the last option in ISFM, when other interventions are not achieving optimal results.

ISFM can be successful for most arable farmers and has been known to double productivity and increase farm-level incomes by 20 to 50 percent if implemented correctly. It focuses on a series of practical approaches to sustainable farm productivity through locally available and affordable options for maintaining soil fertility and productivity, and is seen as a viable approach to reduce over-reliance on inorganic fertiliser. ISFM permits short- and long-term increases in productivity of cash crops and food security, and is considered climate smart as the combined ISFM approach maximises fertiliser uptake and sequestration of carbon in soil, allowing sustainable agricultural intensification driven by improved soil structure and fertility.

Technical Application

In addition to agricultural inputs and the following technical implementation steps, ISFM requires the farmer to consider farm size (land area), and property rights (land tenure) to ensure that investments are efficient and sustainable.

To implement ISFM approaches, the following should be considered:

  • Step 1: Prepare a needs assessment based on understanding of farm challenges – low or declining productivity, soil fertility, low organic content, etc
  • Step 2: Measure fields that require attention to understand volumes of inputs required.
  • Step 3: Develop (or update) an agricultural calendar to use as a platform for discussion between farmer(s) extension officer(s).
  • Step 4: Develop plan and schedule/programme of locally appropriate ISFM interventions between farmer(s) and extension officer(s), obtaining guidance from agricultural suppliers where necessary (lime application, etc). As ISFM is a blended approach, the plan should consider short and medium to long term interventions and outcomes.
  • Step 5: Examine cost implications of the plan, revising where necessary based upon available resources, and if necessary/available apply for credit to fund investments.
  • Step 6: Assess labour requirements within the ISFM plan to ensure that they can be fulfilled, and considerations of gender and youth have been accommodated – women are not expected to do the majority of work, and children are not missing school.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Improves soil structure. Increases soil fertility.
Increase Resilience
Aims at sustainable intensification, increasing resilience through more predictable production.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ISFM has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions owing to greater uptake of Nitrogen-based fertilisers by crops and soil carbon sequestration.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_06_ISFM_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Applying an ISFM approach can be a sustainable way to improve/rehabilitate soil fertility.
  • ISFM is intended to optimise a combination of CSA strategies to achieve maximum outcomes.
  • The focus should be on leveraging locally available materials and resources to improve productivity.
  • ISFM should be seen as a scalable approach, involving a range of interventions that match available inputs and financial and human resources.

Drawbacks

  • Lack of knowledge of applying the different strategies individually or in combination.
  • Potentially high transaction costs as the process involves multiple interventions.
  • Lack of credit facilities.
  • Availability of labour.

Lime Treatment of Soil

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Soil acidification is a widespread problem across southern Africa, often driven by monocropping with cereals and occurring as a result of erosion, compost decomposition and soil leaching. Applying lime to soil is regarded as a key management practice in agriculture to balance pH, enhancing crop productivity, water penetration and absorption of major nutrients by crops. Most crops grow best in soils with a pH between 6.5 and 6.8. Acidity constrains crop growth below pH levels of 5.5. Agricultural lime is limestone mined as a rock that is crushed into various particle sizes ranging from course to fine particles and can be applied in areas where there is high soil-acidity due to high levels of manganese and iron. Lime texture also determines the speed of absorption in the soil; that is, fine-lime reacts more quickly than more granular lime. However, the use of lime must be managed appropriately to avoid losing other nutrients in the soil. This practice is considered climate smart as it assists with adaptation strategies through improvement of soil fertility, whilst improving productivity at modest application rates, noting that annual application is not recommended.

Technical Application

Before applying lime to increase lower soil pH the following should be considered. Equipment required: soil pH testing kit, protective goggles and mask, agricultural lime, shovels/forks/hoes, and disk harrow, drag harrow or hoe if available.

  • Step 1: Use a pH testing strip to determine soil pH levels, making sure to test surface and sub-surface acidity.
  • Step 2: Measure area of land to be treated in order to determine amount of lime for purchase. Application should be calculated as metric tonne per hectare, depending on soil pH and crop. Lime requirements will differ depending on soil type and level of acidity in the soil. Application volumes can be guided by suppliers.
  • Step 3: Purchase lime according to requirements from agricultural supplier. Savings could be realised if purchasing as a group of farmers.
  • Step 4: Apply lime to the soils at least two months prior to planting directly after harvesting to allow the lime to react with the soil, and positively impact the pH.
  • Step 5: Mix lime and soil well in order to reduce soil acidity. This is normally achieved through disk tilling but can be done manually using a drag harrow or hoe. However, this can be an intensive process.
  • Step 6: Test pH prior to planting to ensure amendments have improved soil pH.
  • Step 7: Plant crops. Monitor crop performance, and harvest results with a view to understanding impact of lime treatment.
  • Step 8: Following harvest, test soil pH again.

Application of lime can be part of an Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) practices.

While a practical solution, this soil amendment should be informed by research and discussion with extension officers and lime suppliers. On-farm storage and management of lime should be included in this dialogue.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Significant increases in productivity.
Increase Resilience
Sustainable improvements to soil fertility. Application is not required every year.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_05_AddingLime_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Lime treatment can assist farmers to balance pH in acidic soils, optimising water and nutrient use for crop plant growth.
  • A practical and effective way to combat the negative effects of erosion, compost decomposition and leaching on soil.
  • Lime does not need to applied to soil every year.

Drawbacks

  • Adding lime to soils is laborious and should not be considered a short-term solution to balancing soil pH.
  • Over-application or overuse of lime can negatively affect soil quality.

Organic Fertilisers

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Soil fertility is one of the most critical factors needs to be maintained so farmers can continue to grow productive and nutritious crops, especially in southern Africa where soils are often fragile and lacking in plant nutrients. Soils are often quickly depleted if mismanaged, further exacerbated by natural biophysical processes such as rain, wind and/or heat. The use of organic fertiliser can help farmers to improve soil fertility, as they improve absorption of water and add nutrients into the soil, drastically improving crop production. Organic fertilisers are plant (crop residues) or animal-based materials, such as green manure, worm mouldings, compost, animal waste, and sewage residues, many of which may be readily available on the farm, or within a farming community. These products are potential counters to inorganic fertilisers - artificially manufactured chemicals (synthetic) mined from mineral deposits comprising minerals such as nitrogen, phosphorus and magnesium - which are often costly when few farmers can access credit needed to sustainably access such materials. Organic fertilisers are considered climate smart as they utilise (recycle) readily available organic materials to feed soil and crops simultaneously as they add nutrients into the soil and condition it, and thus increase productivity and resilience, while inorganic fertilisers add nutrients to the soil only, and are often expensive.

Technical Application

Organic fertilisers can be produced at the household level or purchased. On-farm production includes stock-piling animal manure, crop residues, and other organic waste, following appropriate guidance for processing and usage.

To apply organic fertilisers the following should be considered:

  • Step 1: Assess field area where fertiliser is to be applied, and fertiliser needs – poor crop performance, low organic matter content, etc.
  • Step 2: Ensure that fertiliser is available in sufficient quantities for application in all target or priority fields.
  • Step 3: Ensure organic fertiliser – especially green manure/crop residues – are broken-down/chopped to aid breakdown/integration with soil.
  • Step 4: Monitor soil nutrient levels and crop performance (in the light of prevailing climatic conditions) to determine success of organic fertilisers.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Improves efficiency and crop yields.
Increase Resilience
Greater production and efficiency results in increased food security and resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Locks more carbon in the soil and reduces need for inorganic fertilisers.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_04_OrganicFertilisers_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Fertilisers can help restore soil nutrients, improve soil conditions and improve crop production if applied correctly.
  • Organic fertilisers are plant or animal materials that can be produced locally or purchased for application.
  • An appropriate strategy in rural and low-income communities with small holder farmers that can generally not afford synthetic pesticides and inorganic fertilisers.
  • Collective action can minimise the financial cost of implementing organic fertilisers, in terms of shared transportation and storage costs, as well as bulk purchasing power.
  • Use of organic fertilisers can help avoids the leaching of inorganic fertilisers into waterways, which can result in eutrophication.
  • Where farmers do have access to financial resources and/or credit, organic fertilisers should be used in combinate with inorganic application.

Drawbacks

  • Manure and other types of organic fertilisers require management, and relevant storage mechanisms. If not stored correctly, investment can be lost as nutrients can be lost due to exposure to the elements.
  • It can be costly to transport if sourcing from off-farm
  • Weed seeds can be present in manure, increasing labour requirements for weeding.
  • If not produced on-farm, organic fertilisers, while beneficial can require access to sustainable financial resources or credit to implement correctly.
  • Requires extension support to ensure that fertiliser requirements are being met.
Subscribe to Medium

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported