Skip to main content

Biological Control Vectors

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Vectors are organisms that carry diseases from one living being to another without showing symptoms of the diseases themselves. Some of the most common forms of vectors are blood sucking insects such as mosquitos, fleas, lice, ticks and other similar insects, and rats/rodents. Places such as stagnant water and dumping sites can be ideal habitats for vectors to reside and transmit. The use of natural vector predators can help reduce or eliminate vector populations. The most common vectors in southern Africa are insects (tsetse flies-trypanosomiasis), animals (foot and mouth disease through cattle or people with contaminated shoes), tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF).  Sanitising the life-cycle of vectors, implementing pest traps and introducing pest predators are means of reducing the spread of disease. The impacts of climate change, especially increased heavy rainfall and higher temperatures can encourage vector populations to grow quicker than normal. Simple strategies to control vectors includes keeping livestock surroundings clean, avoiding livestock access to stagnant water, fencing areas off, restricting animal access to certain locations, can all control biological vectors and assist in reducing vector spread.

Technical Application

To effectively implement biological control vectors:

  • Step 1: Research common vectors in the local area and ensure that farmers are informed about the kinds, description, lifecycle and common habitats of these vectors, such as tsetse flies, ticks, biting flies.
  • Step 2: Avoid allowing livestock access to dirty and damp environments as well as very bushy areas as these locations are common habitats for vectors.
  • Step 3: Use of traps or even introduction of vector predators to livestock to manage vector spread could be used. This could include introducing epsilon traps for tsetse flies to promote vector control.
  • Step 4: If rodents are found in or around livestock, introduce rodent control methods such as traps and/or rodent predators (cats, etc) and bury any remains far from livestock areas.
  • Step 5: Fence off areas of high vector prevalence, such as stagnant water, ensuring that livestock do not access these areas.
  • Step 6: Examine any rangeland to determine whether there are vectors in the vicinity such as biting insect, or locusts that may damage maize crops and fruit flies that damage tomatoes.
  • Step 7: Community radio can be an effective method for extension officers to inform communities about outbreaks, or impending infestations.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces incidence of disease results in healthier, more productive animals.
Increase Resilience
Reduces risk of secondary infections in livestock. Sale of livestock is a common coping strategy so having more/better livestock to sell increases resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential for more efficient conversion of feed into meat/diary which can reduce emissions per unit production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_53_BiologicalControlVectors_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Identifying the common vectors in the area is a key first step to understanding how to manage them.
  • Using vector traps and introducing vector predators can also help manage livestock exposure.

Drawbacks

  • Biological vectors transport disease that can have devastating impacts on livestock.

Hybridisation Traditional Breeds

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Hybridisation is the agricultural practice of genetically manipulating flora and fauna that differ in heredity. Hybridisation and mutations are the main source of hereditary variation and can result in the increased growth rate, manipulated gender ratios, increased yields, sterile animals, improved flesh quality, increase disease resistance and improve environmental tolerance. Intraspecific hybridisation method is used for livestock breeding whereby individuals of different breeds or strains are mated. Distant hybridisation for livestock is difficult to accomplish as hybrids are usually sterile. Hybrid animals are extremely difficult to produce and specialists often spend their careers attempting to create a new breed of animal. Hybridisation is plant species is more common and has a greater success rate than animal species, however successfully creating a hybrid species remains difficult to achieve. Specialists are trained on the gene sequence and different methods for accomplishing hybridisation. The development of hybrid flora and fauna is often undertaken to address a problem or issue. For example, to address socio-economic challenges agricultural researchers may attempt to produce a species of chickens who lay lager eggs or cows who produce more milk. Hybridisation is also applied to address the challenges of a changing climate including producing crops that are more drought resistant. Due to the research and development of these hybrid species they are expensive to access and often not available in remote areas. Traditional breeds are pure individual species with no DNA alterations. They are often endemic to an area and because of this have evolved and adapted to the geophysical area they are found. Thus, traditional breeds are often found in certain areas, and through traditional knowledge have been incorporated into local farming systems for generations. With an increasingly globalised world, it is difficult to maintain distinct traditional breeds as trade in species, seeds etc. is increasingly prevalent. However, with a new focus and dedication of farmers and researchers to explore indigenous knowledge there is an increased focus on reinvigorating the incorporation of traditional breeds of both flora and fauna.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage hybridisation:

  • Step 1: Contact national extension and research as they are often working on developing new species of flora and fauna to meet local challenges including climate variance and introduce them to local farmers.
  • Step 2: Research best methods applied to the practice of hybridisation in the region.
  • Step 3: Meet with national agricultural extension and research staff as well and local breeders to determine desirable characteristics and possible  crossing of livestock differing in heredity. For example, the mating of two different goat breeds to obtain an improved breed.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased the milk yield or weight gain of animals, thus increasing the amount of food that farmers can produce within available resources.
Increase Resilience
Breeding for resilience to: Pests/disease; and Heat and drought
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_49_HybridisationTraditionalBreeds_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • This agricultural practice is widely used in breeding to increase growth rate, manipulate sex ratios, produce sterile animals, improve flesh quality, increase disease resistance and improve environmental tolerance.

Drawbacks

  • This agricultural practice is widely used in breeding to increase growth rate, manipulate sex ratios, produce sterile animals, improve flesh quality, increase disease resistance and improve environmental tolerance.

Manure Collection, Storage and Treatment

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Manure is organic matter that is used as an organic fertiliser in agricultural practices, conditioning and adding nutrients to soil, generally derived from animal faeces. Manure is the best source of fertiliser available to a farmer, as it can be readily available from livestock, and it a more environmentally friendly option over synthetic fertilisers. Animal manure, compost and green manure are the three different types of manure used in soil management. Manure is collected in different forms: liquid manure, slurry manure or solid manure, and treated in different systems depending on its state. Liquid and slurry manure are stored in liquid (slurry) manure storage systems whereas solid manure is stored in sacks in order to allow air and toxic vapours to move in and out, as well as to maintain the moisture content. The manure is collected and treated (as described below) in order to kill pests that may feed on crops during the application period. The manure is further cleaned to remove unwanted substances such as sticks, and large lumps formed in the manure.

Technical Application

To effectively implement manure collection, storage and treatment:

  • Step 1: Use gloves before handling animal manure from any livestock.
  • Step 2: Use shovels and wheel barrows to load and transport the material.
  • Step 3: Store manure in a contained area, with a solid bottom (cement pad) to prevent runoff and leaching into local waterbodies or groundwater.
  • Step 4:  Mix all types of manure with organic substances such as vegetable waste, garden debris, dead leaves, sawdust, wood ash, hay and straw etc. to add structure and other organic compounds to the soil.
  • Step 5: Turn mixed manure over regularly to allow for combining of nutrients and further aeration.
  • Step 6: Cut-up large particles of animal manure to no more than 10 cm in size.
  • Step 7: Spread manure evenly on field a few weeks prior to planting or during planting. It can also be applied in micro-doses around crops and trees directly.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Organic matter in manure can be used to fertilise crops, improving soil health and productivity.
Increase Resilience
Manure collection and management can contribute to crop production.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_48_ManureCollectionStorageAndTreatment_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The use of manure helps to maintain the organic-matter content of the soil, which can improve soil structure, increases nutrient availability and crop productivity.
  • An additional benefit is that it increases soil carbon and reduces atmospheric carbon levels.
  • Manure application can be spread across fields or in micro-doses.

Drawbacks

  • Manure leachate can carry concentrated ammonia and other potentially harmful organic compounds. Therefore, it should be contained in one area to prevent possible negative environmental impacts from runoff.

Rotational Grazing

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Rotational grazing is a practice of moving livestock between different units of pasture in regular sequence to allow the recovery and regrowth of pasture plants after grazing. This facilitates management of the nutritional needs of the various types of livestock whilst maintaining pasture productivity. Management of intensive grazing/controlled grazing is a climate smart practice as it results in improved forage harvest, soil fertility, resistance to drought, reduced pasture weeds establishment, reduced wastage of forage and soil compaction.

Rotational grazing can also be combined with cut and carry approaches - when managed correctly; rotational grazing can provide enough forage growth early in the grazing season for producers to harvest feed for later use in some paddocks as rotation continues. Farmers can use temporary fence systems to manage the size of, and access to pastures.

Technical Application

To effectively carry out rotational grazing practices:

  • Step 1: Plan livestock grazing system, based on livestock types, stocking density, pasture crop hardiness and production, rainfall, soils and available alternative pasture fields and space, focusing on the nutritional and forage needs of the animals.
  • Step 2: Use temporary electric fence systems to manage the size of the paddock.
  • Step 3: Move livestock between paddocks every set number of days (two days; one week; one month).
  • Step 4: Assess forage quality and quantity, regulating the acreage of access and control by implementing the electric fence system, which uses electrified fencing to determine which parts of the pasture that the livestock will access.
  • Step 5: Monitoring efficacy of the system, changing rotation periods and extend recovery time for grazed land, if land becomes degraded.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased and more productivity per unit area.
Increase Resilience
Gives land time to recover after grazing and hence, being more resilient to extremes.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Increases vegetation cover and soil organic matter and locks carbon.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_47_RotationallGrazing_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Controlled rotational grazing is an effective conservation practice to apply that improves animal management, increases soil fertility, forage productivity, and reduces soil nutrient depletion and soil erosion.

Drawbacks

  • Appropriate land access is a issue, with farmers requiring substantial land or approval and agreement from the community to operationalise the approach.

Fodder

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Fodder is the agricultural term for animal feed. Fodder trees and shrubs play an important role in bridging the gap between livestock feed requirements and the low quality and quantity of feeds available to many farmers. As well as providing feed or acting as a feed supplement for livestock, fodder trees and shrubs supply other benefits, such as firewood and erosion control. Fodder trees are either grown in-situ, from seed, and others are planted in nurseries and then transplanted to the field at the beginning of the rainy season. The transplanting method can be more successful than the direct planting - as high as 34 % better, but with a 24 % increase in cost per plant. Benefits of using fodder trees and shrubs as a dietary supplement include improved growth, health and reproductive capacity, and increased milk and meat production, mostly through increased protean uptake. Fodder trees and shrubs can be planted as living fences, field boundaries and in tree/shrub plantations. Popular species include African acacias, and Atriplex nummularia, Cassia petersiana, C. mopane, D. cineria, F. albida, Julbernadia paniculata, P. reclinata, Piliostigma thonningii, Swartizia madagascariensis and Trema orientalis.

Farmers of all categories can use this climate smart sustainable approach to produce both livestock and field crops to obtain improve benefits, improving nutrition for livestock animals, improving soil health, reducing cost of livestock feeding, and as a result increasing income

Technical Application

To effectively carry out fodder tree-shrub production using a nursery environment – a covered or exposed separate planting area, often close to the farm so saplings can be tended easily - consider the following steps:

  • Step 1: Identify one or more suitable species for fodder production, looking at suitable climatic, soil requirements, nutritional value and palatability, also considering source-plant (for cuttings) or seed availability.
  • Step 2: Take cuttings of up to *1 metre in length from mature trees, cutting at an angle. Cutting should be planted within three days, and if transported, cutting end should be covered in wax or petroleum jelly.
  • Step 3: Cuttings should be planted in 10 to 15 cm of soil either directly where they will grow or shallower in polythene planting cups.
  • Step 4: Fodder crops should be planted as the rainy starts, providing sufficient water and mobilising enough nutrients to assist rapid growth.
  • Step 5: Harvesting is again species specific*, and it is important to determine if drying prior to feeding, affects palatability or nutritional value.
  • Step 6: Harvesting frequency should also be determined independently*as plants mature to ensure sustainable production that does not stunt long-term growth and productivity.
  • Step 7: The farmer should consider how much fodder needs to be consumed immediately, how much dried as hay, and how much chopped and compressed to make silage.

Length of cutting, period prior to transplantation, and harvest quantities vary from species to species. Seek guidance from an agroforestry specialist or farmers that have experience with the process when selecting species, and how specifically to plant, manage and harvest fodder crops. An important element to understand is the volume of tree or shrub-based fodder each animal will require.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Higher meat and/or diary production per unit area of land.
Increase Resilience
Diversification of diet can mitigate the effects of drought on availability of fodder in pasture/ rangeland. Co-benefits in improving soil fertility and reducing erosion.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Woody shrubs and trees lock carbon.
Additional Information
  • Franzel, S., Carsan, S. Lukuyu, B, Sinja, J. Wambugu, C. 2014. Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 6
  • World Agroforestry Centre, 2019. Fodder.
  • Smith, O.B. 1994. Feeding fodder from trees and shrubs: Better Farming Series No. 42. Food and Agriculture organisation of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
  • Karanja G.M. and C.M. Wambugu 2004. Fodder Trees for More Milk and Cash. Ministry of Agriculture (Kenya)/Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Chakeredza, S., Hove, L., Akinnifesi, K.K., Franzel, S., Ajayim, O.C., and Sileshi, G., 2007.Managing fodder trees as a solution to human–livestock food conflicts and their contribution to income generation for smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Natural Resources Forum 31 286–296
  • Steven Franzel, S., Carsan, S., Lukuyu, B., Sinja, J. and Wambugu, C.2012. Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_44_FodderShrubsTrees_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Fodder trees and shrubs can be highly beneficial sources of feed and nutrition for livestock, augmenting, or completely replacing traditional grazing.
  • Can be utilised when over-grazing has occurred, to allow range land to regenerate.
  • Fodder trees and shrubs add vital nutrients to the soil.
  • Fodder trees and shrubs can provide other benefits, including acting as living fences, and wind-breaks, as well as supplying firewood.
  • Crop rotation is important and fodder crops often act as nitrogen fixers (legumes) as well.
  • Fodder crops can also act as cover crops protecting and maintaining soil quality.

Drawbacks

  • Growing fodder can be laborious.
  • The number of fodder trees and shrubs may be extensive, therefore sufficient land is required.
  • Not only does the gathering of fodder require additional labour, but the harvested crop also requires management.

Carrying Capacity Improvement

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Carrying capacity defines the number of Animal Units (AU; head of cattle or number of sheep, goats or other animals) that can graze in a rangeland unit without exhausting the vegetation and soil quality – essentially optimally utilising resources. Optimum carrying capacity is where a given unit of rangeland can support healthy populations of animal species, while allowing an ecosystem to regenerate, thus creating a sustainable balance. The stocking rate - defined as the number of animal species grazing a unit of rangeland for a limited period - must be kept fixed on an average year, meeting the carrying capacity to allow regeneration, the fallen seeds to rejuvenate and the soil to recover. However, stocking rates can fluctuate depending on the nature of the vegetation, rainfall variability, herd composition and management system. If the conditions are not favourable for vegetation growth during drought season, the number of livestock or the grazing period must be adjusted to avoid overgrazing. Moreover, the purpose of livestock keeping, i.e. for milk, meat, or wool production, will determine the carrying capacity of a rangeland unit. Factors such as climatic zone, rainfall dependency, class of livestock (steer, dry cow, calves, lactating cow and bull, etc), health of grassland and animal species affect the stocking rate. While relevant in all climatic zones, it is more applicable in arid and semi-arid zones where rainfall is most scarce. This climate smart practice increases production (meat/dairy), increases pasture resilience to extreme climate hazards (drought) and enhances soil fertility.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Carrying capacity improvement:

  • Step 1: There is no standard equation to determine the carrying capacity of an area, as many variables apply and factors relevant within each context including size of land unit, amount, frequency and timing of rainfall seasons, type of vegetation, species of animal, etc.
  • Step 2: Extension officers should aim to support farmers to continuously monitor rangeland status and realise the impacts of over-grazing and the benefits of finding an equilibrium.
  • Step 3: Constant monitoring of the pasture and animals must be carried out throughout the year to check if stocking rate aligns with the carrying capacity of the land unit. If land degradation is identified, adjustments to stocking rates should be considered, in the context of season and landscape regeneration.
    • For communal grazing land, it is ideal to use Animal Units (AU) to calculate the relative grazing impact of different kinds and classes of domestic livestock and/or even common grazing wildlife species for one month (AUM = Animal Unit Months). This information should support collective decision-making regarding rangeland resources.

        Using a conversion table of, the AUE (Animal Unit Equivalent) and the formula:

        1) multiply the number of animals to be grazed on the pasture by AUE to determine total AU, then

        2) multiply the total AU by the number of months planned to graze (see formula below or

        Worksheet A of the Range Calculator).

        Formula: _____________ x _____________ = _____________ x _____________ = _____________

                        # Animals         AUE(table)     Animal Units (AU)   Months (M)           AUM

  • Step 4: One option for effectively responding to carrying capacity challenges is shift or changing grazing species if high consumption species are placing pressure on a particular unit of land.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Higher meat and/ or dairy production per unit area.
Increase Resilience
Improved pasture (through proper management) allow higher numbers without retrogression, thus more resilient even to drought conditions, erosion, flooding, etc.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Increases soil organic matter and plants-thus locks more carbon (c-sequestration).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_43_CarryingCapacityImprovement_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Identifying, achieving and maintaining optimal carrying capacity helps to avoid rangeland degradation including vegetation depletion and soil erosion, bush encroachment, and optimises resource use.
  • Effectively monitoring carrying capacity can allow communities to respond to climate change impacts, resulting from shifting rainfall patterns and temperature regimes.

Drawbacks

  • Rainfall dependency, class of livestock and quality of grassland affect stocking rate.
  • The stocking rate must be monitored to avoid animal overcrowding, which might cause diseases to spread quickly.
  • It is important to monitor the plant species in your pasture and or rangelands to be able to determine its health and trend.
  • Reseeding should be considered in areas when land is degrading.

Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) is a technique of restoring degraded land and monitoring restoration of the land involving the systematic regeneration and management of trees and shrubs from tree stumps, roots and seed. Degraded arid land often features left over indigenous plants, which if maintained and promoted to grow can improve pasture and crop lands while simultaneously encouraging re-growth of seeds, roots and shrubs. Key to this practice is the existence of living stumps, tree roots and seed that, if encouraged, will regrow. The land is protected from being completely cleared or further grazed and this allows trees to grow without disturbance. Once the stumps and trees start to grow, pruning and trimming of trees is required to allow space between trees and promote healthy long tree trunks. Once the trees have matured, intercropping can take place or livestock can be re-introduced to graze.

While requiring some investment in terms of effort, FMNR has climate smart advantages such as controlling rainfall/irrigation run-off, supporting water quality improvements, providing sources of timber or fodder, supporting habitant regeneration for pollinator insect species, acting as sun shade, and reducing soil erosion.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration:

  • Step 1: Degraded land needs to be identified and living stumps, roots and seeds need to be encouraged to regrow. This may include periodic watering. Focus should be on indigenous species, and present tree species (existing stumps).
  • Step 2: Consider leaving the field un-grazed to promote tree growth.
  • Step 3: Select tree stumps and the tallest and straightest stems to grow into trees.
  • Step 4: Prune and manage by removing stems and unwanted side branches.
  • Step 5: Maintain the process by occasionally pruning side branches.
  • Step 6: Manage the land consistently to avoid overgrazing, which can lead to further degradation.
  • Step 7: Consider rotational grazing to allow seeds, stumps and underground shrubs to re-grow. This will reduce the cost of replanting. Shrubs and growing trees and saplings need to be protected before introducing livestock. Shrubs and growing trees and saplings need to be protected before introducing livestock.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increase availability of biomass, which improves soil fertility and thus production. The trees/shrubs can be a source of income and reduce costs.
Increase Resilience
Reduces erosion of soil and evaporation. Increases water retention and infiltration. Diversifies income sources. Improves yield stability.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Locks more carbon in plants and in soil.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_35_FarmerManagedNaturalRegeneration_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • FMNR improves soil quality and reduces soil erosion.
  • Improved dry-season pasture.
  • Agricultural management practices such as pruning, and trimming are carried out appropriately in turn improving growth and air circulation.
  • Higher livestock productivity.
  • Provides protection from wind and shade for livestock, when introduced.
  • Increased availability of firewood, thatch and other non-timber forest-products/materials.

Drawbacks

  • The land needs to be managed consistently to avoid overgrazing.

Agroforestry: Silvo-Pasture

Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Agroforestry is a land management practice that combines the planting and management of trees and shrubs with crops and pasture, providing benefits of soil health, crop yields, resilience to climate change, biodiversity and economic opportunities. Agroforestry encompasses numerous practices, including silvo-pasture, agro-silvo cultural, and agro-silvo-pastural. One such successful agroforestry practice is silvo-pasture – the planting of trees and shrubs within livestock grazing pasture lands. Not to be confused with agrosilvopasture (combination of crops, shrubs/trees and livestock, silvopasture is the combination of trees and shrubs with pastural grazing land. The trees can be regularly or irregularly placed, and in addition to improving soil conditions in pasture lands, also provide production of protein-rich tree fodder for on farm feeding and for cut-and-carry fodder production. If growing larger species of tree, coppicing can also produce timber for building materials and firewood.

Technical Application

To effectively implement hedge planting:

  • Step 1: Purchase saplings of selected tree species from a local nursery or grow saplings in separate on-farm nursery. If growing on-farm, saplings should be held-up with an upright support bamboo/wooden pole. Ideally, the farmer should begin exploring silvopasture tree species beginning with indigenous trees, such as acacias, and other local trees. It is worth considering a mixture of species, as well as mixed shallower and deeper rooted trees.
  • Step 2: Once at a meter or over in height, transplant to pastures, surrounding each individual sapling with a wire mesh cage-tube or insert into five-centimetre diameter PVC pipe to protect from browsers. Plant at least ten to twenty meters apart, in either a random or uniform pattern. This is a matter of preference.
  • Step 3: Once saplings are planted, only allow grazing livestock (cows, sheep, ducks, geese, chickens) in the silvopasture, avoiding browsers (goats, etc), which will strip, damage or destroy the saplings.
  • Step 4: Once mature and above browsing height, two plus meters, remove protective cage or pipe.
  • Step 5: Depending on species, pruning, coppicing etc should be performed every two months to ensure that trees remain healthy and productive, while maximising outputs for in-field and cut and carry fodder.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Diversified agricultural outputs supports sustainable agricultural productivity, providing multiple streams of revenue, reducing labour and cost for land clearance and maintaining healthy pasture land.
Increase Resilience
As climate change alters local grazing land, silvopasture can reduce overgrazing and land degradation. Trees introduced into pasture can create a more positive environment for livestock, including shade in warmer climates, and shelter during rainfall.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Retaining trees within pasture land and minimising complete conversion of land reduces greenhouse gas emissions and retains carbon in the soil.
Additional Information
  • Balehegn, M., 2017. Silvopasture Using Indigenous Fodder Trees and Shrubs: The Underexploited Synergy Between Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in the Livestock Sector. Chapter from book The Need for Transformation: Local Perception of Climate Change, Vulnerability and Adaptation Versus ‘Humanitarian’ Response in Afar Region, Ethiopia (pp.493-510). ResearchGate.
  • Jose, S. & Dollinger, 2019. Silvopasture: a sustainable livestock production system. Chapter in J. Agroforest Syst (2019)
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_34_SilvoPasture_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Presence of trees can be beneficial to livestock in terms of shade and shelter, as well as enhancing carbon storage and enriching biodiversity.
  • Manure from livestock can improve soil health in grazing land.
  • Leaf litter and pruned material also add organic matter to soil, improving productivity and drainage.
  • Presence of trees can contribute to reducing soil erosion.
  • Trees can produce numerous forest products, including timber for firewood and construction.
  • There is an opportunity to diversify income for small-holder farms and increase food security.
  • Tree trimmings and leaf litter can also be used for in-field or cut and carry fodder.

Drawbacks

  • Requires some investment in terms of purchase of seed and/or saplings.
  • May require adjustment for mixed grazing and browsing livestock patterns.
  • If dietary requirements of livestock are not complete, animals may strip bark from trees. This can be avoided by ensuring that pasture stocking is not too high, and best efforts are made to encourage pasture health and supplementing livestock feed with the necessary minerals, energy and protein.

Boundary Planting

Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Boundary planting, also known as live fence planting, is a technique used to protect crops from the interference of people and animals that can disturb plant growth. Trees/shrubs are a good example of this approach as they can form a shield when planted along the boundaries of the garden or surrounding a planted field. The trees/shrubs act as wind break to shield plants against strong winds causing physical damage to plants themselves, or the removal of soil (erosion). Additional benefits include the use of branches for firewood or building materials, and the other parts of trees can be used as fodder, fruit or leave harvested for consumption, or for medicinal use. Tree/shrub spacing is critical, as trees that have dense canopies can conversely cause destructive down-drafts, negating the intended benefits. Boundary planting helps limit global warming by mitigating GHG emissions through reducing harmful gases such as, carbon dioxide, from the atmosphere and releasing oxygen.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Boundary Planting practices:

  • Step 1: Plant long lines of two fast growing trees, Caesalpinia velutina trees, between a Bombacopsis quinate and a Swietenia humilis to be replaced over time.
  • Step 2: Consider planting the boundary trees 1.5 metres apart along pre-existing fences.
  • Step 3: Attach metal fencing to the trees to support the large trees without endangering their growth. Harvest fodder when the tree is overgrown.
  • Step 4: Prune lower brunches to encourage upward growth of trees and reduce shed on the plants.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increases availability of tree shrub products (nuts, fruits, timber etc.) and biomass, which improves soil fertility, and thus production.
Increase Resilience
Reduces erosion of soil and evaporation. Increases water retention and infiltration. Diversifies income sources. Improves yield stability.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Locks more carbon in plants and in the soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_33_BoundaryPlanting_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Live fence planting is cost effective, conserves soil moisture, acts a windbreak and reduces soil erosion. These trees have various benefits such as medicinal use, mulch, livestock feeds, fruits, bee forage, timber and firewood.
  • Maintenance of boundary trees is low with short, medium and long ecological and economic benefits.

Drawbacks

  • Boundary planting occupies more land than a single row.

Alternate Wetting and Drying

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Altitudinal Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Alternate wetting and drying also called intermittent flooding is a technique developed by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) to control water consumption in rice fields (CGIAR 2014). This technology saves water throughout the year in areas of variable rainfall. It is designed as a pick-up water system in cases when water consumption is cut. Water levels are monitored and controlled by the removal of excess water, leaving enough water to sustain crops. Alternate wetting and drying reduces greenhouse gas emissions especially methane, which is emitted from flooded rice fields (FAO 2016). The drying phase helps to sustain and develop plant roots. Moreover, costs on fuel used for irrigation are reduced.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Alternate Wetting and Drying practices:

  • Step 1: Alternate wetting and drying should be considered by the farmer after two weeks of rice transplant.
  • Step 2: The farmer should consider digging half of 30 cm tube into soil to monitor water level.
  • Step 3: When the water level is 15 cm below the soil surface the field should be irrigated again with a depth of 3 to 5 cm before water drains.
  • Step 4: This cycle should be repeated until flowering stage to avoid disturbing reproduction because at this stage the crops are sensitive to water stress.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Cost of production reduced through less use of water.
Increase Resilience
Maintain production with reduced inputs. Predictable yields.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
May reduce GHG emissions from irrigation pumps.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_31_AlternateWettingandDrying_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Alternate wetting and drying maintains rice yields in areas with variable rainfall/irrigation water supply.
  • Reduces greenhouse gas emission such as methane.
  • The technology can be carried out in regions prone to heavy rainfall.

Drawbacks

  • Water levels need to be monitored carefully to avoid water stress which might decrease yield.
  • Not recommended in areas with potential salinity stress as reduced water inputs might aggravate salinity levels and cause yield decline.
Subscribe to Positive

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported