Skip to main content

Subsurface Fertilisation

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Subsurface fertilisation is the agricultural practice of placing compressed balls of fertiliser, known as briquettes, deep in the soil. The balls of fertiliser are known to gradually release nitrogen, feeding the crops with the desired nutrients. This practice is usually carried out in flooded fields and although originally used for urea application in irrigated rice, it can be used with other fertilisers and crop types. Sub-surface fertilisation prevents the loss of nitrogen during floods as the application is placed 7-10 cm deep in the soil, converted to ammonium, which is much less mobile than nitrates. Only about 4% of nitrogen is lost to the environment when applying in the sub-surface, as compared to 35% when nitrogen is applied using the broadcasting application practice. Urea briquettes are small (~2 cm diameter), and home-made manure briquettes – more practical and applicable for crops other than rice – are larger – up to 10 cm in diameter.

This fertiliser application technique is considered climate smart as it maximises fertiliser inputs, increasing productivity and providing a mechanism for adapting to climate change by amending soil properties to remain productive.

Technical Application

To effectively implement subsurface fertilisation, the following should be carried out. Use of briquette machines to produce 1 to 3 grams of briquettes that are larger than conventional fertiliser granules is recommended:

  • Step 1: Prior to application, dig small holes 7 to 10 centimetres deep along planting rows in drained rice paddy or regular field, ideally located in the centre between a location where four plants will be planted.
  • Step 2: Place the briquettes in the whole, below the soil surface, and cover with dug soil.
  • Step 3: Crops should be planted within seven days of fertiliser application.

Following are the main steps for making your own briquettes. Making briquettes leading up to planting is more effective, as they are not stored for too long. A standard briquette machine can be purchased for between USD 3,000 and USD 6,000.

  • Step 1: Collect manure from cow and/or horse waste.
  • Step 2: Allow the manure to moderately dry (so it is possible to handle), but not for extensive periods, otherwise it will degrade. Keep manure out of direct sunlight, or when processing, remove the outer layer before manufacturing briquettes, and do not leave exposed, especially during rainy periods.
  • Step 3: Press manure into briquettes using briquette press machine – see directions below to make your own home-press.
  • Step 4: Allow the briquettes to dry in a cool, dry location, and store for later use.

To make your own large manure briquette press using household items, follow the instructions below:

  • Step 1: Cut the top off a straight-sided 2-litre plastic soft drink bottle at the top of straight side.
  • Step 2: Obtain a tinned food can that is just smaller than the diameter of the bottle. Preferably leave tin un-opened.
  • Step 3: Line the bottle with a plastic bag.
  • Step 4: Place slightly damp manure (cow, horse or both) inside the bag, inside the bottle, filling the space.
  • Step 5: Place tin on top of manure.
  • Step 6: Place small plank of wood on top of the tin.
  • Step 7: Place your foot on top of the piece of wood, and slowly apply pressure to the tin, pressing the manure down, adding more manure if it compresses further than the depth of the tin.
  • Step 8: When the manure will compress no more, remove plank and tin, and draw the compressed manure from the bottle, removing the plastic bag to reveal a cylinder of compressed manure.
  • Step 9: Slice with a sharp knife to discs 2 to 3 cm thick, and use a piece of 2 cm diameter metal or plastic pipe to punch a hole through each disc. Reuse the
  • Step 10: Allow to air dry as individual rings in a cool dry place. As soon as they are strong enough, you can hang the rings on wire to continue to dry. Use in fields within a month of manufacture. The ring increases surface area, and speeds-up the drying process.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
A highly effective soil amendment that increases nutrients and organic matter in soil, and in turn productivity.
Increase Resilience
An effective mechanism for amending soil in the face of changing climates.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
If using fertiliser to amend soil, this approach retains substantially more of the fertiliser in the soil to augment nutrients; therefore, is more efficient.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_67_SubsurfaceFertilisation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • This application preserves the nutrients deep in the soil and nourishes the soil making nitrogen available to the crops throughout their growth cycle.
  • Maximises fertiliser application, as little is lost to the atmosphere.
  • Farm waste such as manure can be repurposed into briquettes for subsurface fertiliser application.
  • Can provide a revenue generation opportunity for enterprising community members.

Drawbacks

  • Requires additional labour to gather material, and to make briquettes.
  • There is a financial commitment for purchasing briquette-making equipment.
  • Briquettes can be made by hand, but it requires additional labour and time.

Banding and Micro Dosing

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

While rotating crops or leaving fields fallow for several growing seasons is good practice, some farmers do not have this luxury, needing to continue planting season upon season. However, this practice will soon see soils depleted of nutrients. In these cases, use of green manure, and organic fertilisers is recommended. In. the last-resort cases where chemical fertilisers must be used, banding and micro-dosing are approaches that rationalise or minimise application. Banding is the agricultural practice of placing fertiliser in a row below soil surface, covering with soil and planting seeds above the fertiliser, whereas Micro-dosing – sometimes referred to as ring-placement - is the practice of placing small, more affordable amounts of fertiliser around each crop plant. Banding is a common method used for basal fertiliser applications and uses less fertiliser than broadcasting as it is applied in rows rather than throughout the whole field. Micro-dosing is applicable where plants are widely spaced and where soil increases the chances of nutrient loss due to leaching. While the use of chemical fertilisers is not strictly considered climate smart, these practices promote economic and rationalised application of fertilisers, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, whilst improving resilience in the face of climate change, and providing options for maintain agricultural productivity.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage banding and micro-dosing for maize and sorghum, the following should be carried out. When handling fertilisers, always ensure that safety precautions provided on the packaging are followed.

Banding – suitable when wishing to save on fertiliser expenditure, but still need to improve production of primary and secondary crops.

  • Step 1: Plough the field using a draught animal-drawn or mechanised plough to carefully open furrows. Depending on availability of mechanised equipment, a narrow hoe can also be used if manual labour is favoured. This can reduce workload and minimise soil disturbance but may require more effort.
  • Step 2: Count furrows and measure length to ensure that you have sufficient fertiliser for area, based on recommended application amounts (see packaging or see advice from supplier).
  • Step 3: Apply fertilisers as a strip or line (band) along the furrow.
  • Step 4: Turn furrow back over ensuring that the fertiliser is present at a depth of 5-8cm below the soil surface and covered by the soil. The basal fertiliser should not touch the seed as it may burn it and disturb its germination.

Micro-dosing: suitable when fertiliser is in short supply.

  • Step 1: in the field, at the time of planting, prepare small pits 5 to 8 cm deep where each seed is to be placed.
  • Step 2: measure approximately 6 grams of fertiliser using a bottle cap or a three-finger pinch.
  • Step 3: place the micro-dose in the small pits.
  • Step 4: cover fertiliser with a small amount of soil, then place the seed. Cover fully with soil and water, or allow rain to wet the ground.
  • Where manure is available, Zai pits can be used to improve organic matter at the same time. Prior to planting, dig the small pit and fill with manure. When rains begin, fertiliser and seed are placed in the hole and covered.
  • The practice includes the advantage of banding by placing the fertiliser below the seed but at a single point instead of a row.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
While seen as a last resort, these focused applications of chemical fertilisers can lead to sustained agricultural productivity.
Increase Resilience
In some areas, use of fertilisers is unavoidable, especially in areas impacted by climate change.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
These economical uses of fertiliser minimise or rationalise fertilisers, reduce contributions to GHG emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_66_BandingAndMicroDosing_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Banding is the most commonly used method for basal fertiliser applications, and it uses much less fertiliser as it is applied in rows.
  • Micro-Dosing maintains and increases crop production with less fertiliser, crops become less susceptible to diseases/pests and reduces GHG emissions per kg of crop produce.
  • Micro-dosing has been known to double or even triple yields and plant biomass.
  • If using fertiliser, these approaches can save significantly on the cost of fertilisers, as is
  • Can be used to supplement organic fertilisers if in short supply.
  • Both techniques are more economic for smallholders.

Drawbacks

  • Use of chemical fertilisers has a cost attached.
  • Chemical fertilisers are not strictly a CSA approach.
  • Requires a sustainable supply of fertilisers.
  • If small-holders are purchasing fertilisers, they are often only available in 50 kg bags, which often make them economically inaccessible. Agriculture for development projects have been lobbying manufacturers to also provider smaller bags.
  • If 50 kg bags are purchased, fertiliser must be stored in cool dry place – following instructions on packaging.
  • Micro-dosing can be very time and labour intensive.

Integrated Pest Management

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is the careful consideration of all available pest control techniques and subsequent integration of appropriate measures that discourage the development of pest populations and keep pesticides and other interventions to levels that are economically justified and reduce or minimise risks to human health and the environment, focusing on all practical options for reducing or eliminating pesticides. The practice of IPM for crop protection is widely encouraged, as the practice can enhance crop production and reduce risks associated with use, storage and management of pesticides. The integrated nature of this approach ensures that it is climate smart, as it utilises the best possible options to ensure sustainable productivity, which will in turn allow adaptation to climate change. However, as it may require the use of pesticides as one strategy, the climate-smartness may be affected.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage integrated pest management:

  • Step 1: Identify damage and responsible pest. Regular crop monitoring is important, to ensure early identification. Bottle traps are useful for capturing samples to examine and identify a pest.
  • Step 2: Learn about the pest and host life cycle and biology.
  • Step 3: Monitor or sample environment for pest population.
  • Step 4: Establish action threshold. If aiming to tackle weed infestation, intervention must occur before the weed matures and begins spreading seeds. Some thresholds are high. For example, if dealing with caterpillars, soya beans can tolerate a certain level of defoliation without it impacting crop yield.
  • Step 5: Identify IPM response tactics.
    • Cultural methods –planting crops that are adapted or suited to conditions and responding to their water, nutrient and shelter needs.
    • Physical methods – mechanical weeding, such as mechanical weeding or using organic or plastic mulch to cover the ground to reduce weed presence/success.
    • Genetic methods – selecting modified or adapted pest-resistant varieties.
    • Biological methods – using natural predators, push-pull approaches, intercropping, etc. and use of use of organic pesticides.
    • Chemical methods – considering all levels of toxicity – from pheromone deterrents to conventional pesticides.
  • Step 6: monitoring for ongoing efficacy, and adjustment of tactics where relevant/necessary.  Aiming at all times to use chemical pesticides rationally and as a very last resort.

In the cases where chemical pesticides are used as part of an IPM strategy, the Agri-Intel website is an invaluable resource, which provides detailed chemical management advice: https://www.agri-intel.com.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Practical reduction or elimination of pesticide use reduces or removes the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
Increase Resilience
Practical reduction or elimination of pesticide use reduces or removes the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
IPM maximises opportunities for agricultural productivity while minimising or eliminating the use of pesticides.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_65_IntergratedPestManagement_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • IPM is the agricultural practice of combining several practices to maximise benefits.
  • Pesticides are used following the safety information given on the packaging, when other approaches are not effective

Flooding Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Flooding irrigation is a practice where water is pumped or allowed to flow into channels passing between crop rows in areas where farmers have level fields. This flooding system is an effective method of managing weeds and pests, preventing the completion of their lifecycles as they are either drowned or isolated from air and sunlight. This practice is applicable in areas where there are favourable climatic conditions with high rainfall amounts; and is not recommended in arid and semi-arid environments. Flooding is controlled using water pumps in order to reduce waterlogging problems, and fields should not be entirely flooded, with surges of periodic flooding used to distribute water and avoid wastage to run-off, evaporation and creation of anaerobic conditions in the soil. Flood waters can be filtered using a fine mesh to control pests and diseases from spreading to neighbouring fields. Sandy soil is not favourable for flood irrigation as it does not evenly distribute water across the field whereas loam and clay soils distribute water efficiently across the field.

It is considered a climate smart practice because it requires less energy, and can promote crop productivity, whilst controlling weeds and pests.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage flooding irrigation:

  • Step 1: prepare the field, digging parallel furrows and raising beds with the excess soil. Crops are planted in beds, and the irrigation water will flow in the furrows.
  • Step 2: Using a pump or gravity fed water storage, allow water to flow into the field, flooding furrows.
  • Step 3: Insert a fine mesh or introduce a hessian sack at the in-flow point to trap weeds and pests.
  • Step 4: Water release should be moderated so as not to flow too fast and erode beds, and too slow such that it remains trapped at the in-flow point.
  • Step 5: Water release can be more effective if released in surges, taking advantage of infiltration rates and capillary action in soil.
  • Step 6: Observe progress. Avoid leaving soil crusts, which will make water rush over.

A sustainable water source must be identified and a pumping/irrigation system should be used.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Less energy is required to irrigate crops, potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions if generators used for pumping water.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective flood irrigation can increase
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_64_FloodingIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • A flood irrigation system reduces weed growth and acts as preventive measure against spread of pests and diseases.
  • Requires less energy, so reduces costs. Gravity does the work, so less need for pumping.
  • Flood irrigation can work with lower-quality water because the water doesn’t contact with crop leaves, which is usually a concern with waste water.

Drawbacks

  • Requires larger amounts of water than other types of irrigation – only suitable in wetter climates.
  • Is considered more labour intensive as land must be closely managed, and prepared.
  • Land must be level, or manually/mechanically levelled.
  • Cannot effectively operate in sandy soils.
  • Very clay-heavy soil can easily become water-logged.
  • If not managed properly, can be very wasteful with respect to water.

Use of Organic/Chemical Control of Pests

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Locally/home-made organic pest control involves the use of home-made remedies to kill and control pests naturally without harming the crop or the environment. Some of the natural pesticides that farmers can use includes soap water, neem, chilli, vegetable oil spray and garlic. These natural remedies are cheaper than the use of chemicals but should be applied in specific amounts for them to be effective. The field must be kept clean to avoid weeds, which provide habitats for insects and weaker crops that are infected must be removed and disposed of away from the field area to avoid attracting further infestations. It is important to minimise disturbance of soil through digging or tilling if not necessary as this can introduce pests into the soil. Alternative approaches such as intercropping, crop rotation, and push/pull systems can also contribute to preventing the spread of pests. This is a climate smart option as it reduces the contribution of pesticides/insecticides to greenhouse gas emissions, and supports sustainable agricultural productivity. If organic insecticides are not effectively killing insects at the rate the farmer wants/needs, chemical controls can be used to halt pest infestation and avoid complete crop loss. However, chemical control of pests should always be the last resort, as chemical pesticides while often hugely effective, are expensive and must be applied precisely to be effective. Furthermore, if used inaccurately chemical pesticides can contaminate crops and the environment, and can impact the farmers’ health. The use of chemicals destroys natural pest enemies and can lead to pest invasion and resistance to pesticides in future, driving continued reliance on chemicals. For example, ants can be a very effective biological control agent against Fall Armyworm (FAW); however, ant populations will also be affected by pesticides.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage chemical use of organic control measures:

  • Organic pesticides must be made based on the type of pests that attack the field along with their productivity rate.
  • Equipment needed. Small measures (teaspoons or baking measures), plastic cup, plastic bucket (>1 litre), stirring rod or large spoon/spatula. Spray bottles or back-pack pump spray. Tools used in the field must be cleaned properly to avoid attracting other pests
  • When spraying, wear goggles, gloves and disposable masks, and avoid spraying on windy or rainy days.
  • It is recommended that any spray is tested before large-scale application. Spray and leave for 24 hours to see if treatment is effective.

a. Basic neem oil spray insecticide: effective against aphids, whiteflies, snails, nematodes, mealybugs, cabbage worms,  gnats, moths, cockroaches, flies, termites, mosquitoes, and scale.

  • Step 1: Mix 1 cup of vegetable oil with 1 tablespoon of liquid soap in a plastic beaker or cup (cover and shake thoroughly),
  • Step 2: When ready to apply, mix oil spray mix with 1 litre of water,
  • Step 3: Pour spray mix into a spray bottles or a back-pack pump spray,
  • Step 4: Shake thoroughly, and spray directly on the surfaces of affected plants. The oil coats the bodies of the insects, effectively suffocating them, as it blocks the pores through which they breathe.
    - Use mixture within eight-hours.

b. Garlic spray: a general organic insecticide that kills most insects.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Use of organic pesticides/insecticides avoids the use of chemical compounds that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.
Increase Resilience
These can be effective tools to combat insect infestations as climates change.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Effective control of insect pests can help maintain crop production and avoid crop losses.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_63_ChemcialUseofOrganicControl_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The use of organic insecticides promotes biodiversity as it does not kill pest enemies unlike when using chemicals.
  • Healthy soil is required by applying compost and manure in order to not attract pests.
  • When handling chemicals, health precaution must be in place such as wearing gloves and nose masks to avoid contamination.

Drawbacks

  • The natural remedies are cheaper than chemical control, but they do not kill pests as fast as chemicals.
  • Inappropriate use of pesticides can be harmful to both farmers and food therefore, pesticide application guidelines must be followed to ensure efficiency.

Weeding by Hand/Hoe

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A weed plant is an unwanted plant that grows among and competes with crops for water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space. The removal of such plants from fields – known as ‘weeding’ - is vital to enhancing crop growth. They can be removed by cutting their roots either by hand or using an implement such as a hoe. Some cereal crops like rice and maize attract weeds that are herbicide resistant; hence, the use of a hoe in removing the weeds is the most effective practice. However, as mechanic weeding can result in release of weed seeds into the soils as the hoe makes contact with the plant, weeding by-hand is the best way for weed removal to prevent weed seeds from falling onto the ground for further germination; this can increase the labour intensity of weeding considerably. This is a climate smart practice as it mitigates the emission of greenhouse gases from herbicides into the atmosphere, land and water systems. Furthermore, weeding helps maintain sustainable agricultural productivity, when considered an integral part of farm management and operations. However, weeding has been identified as one of the largest labour inputs for subsistence agriculture, accounting for between 30 and 50 % of on-farm labour requirements.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  mechanical weeding:

  • Step 1: Farmers should be able to identify weeds resistance to herbicides.
  • Step 2: Examine fields to understand level of weed infestation – can they be easily and effectively removed using a hoe, without spreading seeds, or will manual weeding be necessary.
  • Step 3: Attempt to quantify the amount of labour needed. Can the work be completed by the adults on the farm, or will additional labour be required? Will youths be involved in weeding? Will they miss school?
  • Step 4: Begin removal of weeds, ensuring that weeds are uprooted and removed from the field to avoid regeneration. A hoe must have a long handle to be able to work effectively and the hoe blade must not be too sharp in order to cut weeds without going through crops and spreading seed and cuttings.
  • Step 5: Weeding should take place a minimum of three times over the growing season – one week before planting crops, three weeks after planting (when the crop has two to three leaves), and two months after planting (milk-stage ). The aim is to reduce or eliminate the product of seeds in the weed plants.
  • Step 6: Draft animal-drawn cultivators can reduce labour requirements but should only be used to cultivate soil to a shallow depth, retaining soil structure, but not disturbing soil. Weeds should be collected by hand afterwards. Deeper tilling or turning of the soil with the wrong implement may cause more harm than good.
  • Step 7: Weeding must be sustained year on year to reduce prevalence. It is important to caution farmers that results may not be seen in significant reduction of plants until year-two of a weeding programme.
  • Step 8: Obnoxious weeds – such as Striga, etc – should be burned once pulled, preferably away from the field, in order to eradicate their presence.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Weeding by hand is an effective method of controlling weeds, and ensuring maximum productivity.
Increase Resilience
A regular and diligent weeding strategy will maintain productivity in a changing climate.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Mitigates emission of greenhouse gases from release of herbicides into the atmosphere.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_60_WeedingbyHandHoe_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Weeding can reduce competition for crops in terms of water, air, sunlight, nutrients and space, making a crop more productive.
  • Weeding is cheaper than the use of herbicides.
  • Weeding by hand or hoe reduces the use of chemicals however, it is as effective as using herbicides.
  • Some weeds produce noxious gases which can have negative impacts on crop growth.

Drawbacks

  • Some of the cereal crops attract weeds that are resistant to herbicides.
  • Manual and mechanical weeding can be physically demanding and may require additional labour resources for larger fields.
  • Manual weeding requires approximately 25 % more labour than using herbicides.

Short Term Reactive Practices

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Short-term reactive practices are control options for pests and diseases once they have reached a level where the economic losses are likely to be greater than the cost of controlling the pest/disease outbreaks and can be used to maintain or increase production. Pests and diseases are better detected at an earlier stage to make it easier to act and prevent severe crop losses and prohibit the spread of pests and diseases throughout the whole field, achieved through regular and systematic field inspections. The practice is considered climate smart as it reduces losses, which in-balance lowers greenhouse gas emissions per tonne of crop produced, it retains agricultural productivity through management of pest infestation and/or disease outbreaks, and is applicable as it can assist farmers adjust to changing climate, and the threat of new and changing pest diseases.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  short term reactive practices:

  • Step 1: Inspecting the crop regularly and systematically by walking through the field following an M-shaped pattern will ensure that the farmer does not just look around the edges, but also inspects in the middle of the field.
  • Step 2: Farmers should carefully examine the crops for any signs of pests/diseases. They may be able to identify the presence of pests or disease through observing the following:
    • If the plant is wilted.
    • Are the leaves more yellow than usual?
    • Are the crops smaller than usual?
    • Do the leaves have spots?
    • Have parts of the plan died?
  • Step 3: Once the foreign specie has been identified, the farmer should employ a method to eradicate the issue thoroughly and immediately.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced losses result in lower GHG emissions per tonne produced.
Increase Resilience
Reduces losses due to management of pest/disease outbreaks.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Farmers can make informed decisions resulting in sustainable losses.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_59_ShortTermReactivePractices_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Short term reactive practices eradicate the pest or disease.
  • The aim is to protect the long-term health of the field/herd for the next season or growing period.

Drawbacks

  • Pests and disease can have devastating impacts on both crops and livestock and can persist throughout growing seasons.

Push and Pull Systems

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

A push pull system is a technique that repels parasitic plants and pests that attach themselves to the crop roots and feed on them.. In push-pull, a cereal crop is intercropped with a leguminous plant like desmodium or molasses grass, while a popular fodder crop, Napier grass, is planted as a border around the field. Desmodium produces volatile chemicals that attract predators of the cereal e.g of maize pests. More importantly, by giving a false distress signal to the moths that the area is already infested, these chemicals ‘push’ the egg laying moths away from the crop to seek out habitats where their larvae will face less competition for food. Napier grass also produces volatile chemicals that ‘pull’ the moths towards them, and then exudes a sticky substance that traps the stem borer larvae as they feed. Few larvae survive. Napier grass attracts stem borer predators.  The intercropping is a climate smart practice as it mitigates emission of Greenhouse gases through the reduced need for pesticides. The push-pull system improves food security and boosts farm income.

Technical Application

To effectively implement  push and pull systems:

  • Step 1: Plant Napier and a legume like Desmodium or molasses grass  between every three rows of maize/sorghum as barriers to repel stemborers away from crops.
  • Step 2: Plant the Desmodium first as soon as the rains begin, so it immediately repels the stalk borers before the maize/sorghum emerge.
  • Step 3: Plant three rows of Naiper grass around the borders of maize field.
  • Step 4:  Allow pest enemies such as ants and spiders to enter the field to feed on stemborers.
  • Step 5: Cut grass and fed to animals as forage.
  • Step 6:  Abandon areas that are heavily affected by stemborers until treated.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
A push-pull system supports sustainable productivity by reducing the need for expensive pesticides, and boosting farm income.
Increase Resilience
A sustainable and environmentally friendly method for maintaining soil health and productivity while controlling pests.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced application of synthetic fertilisers reduces greenhouse gas emissions.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_58_PushandPullSystems_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Reduces the need for pesticides.
  • Improves food security and boost farmers’ income.
  • The green technique deals with trapping the pests (pull) and repelling them (push) by planting Napier and desmodium or molasses grass next to cereal crops.
  • The relationship between insect-plant and insect-insect (introducing pest enemies such as ants/spiders) is achieved in order to kill stemborers.
  • Grass planted next to crops can be salvaged and used as forage.

Drawbacks

  • Naiper grass take up space on the field.
  • Cost and lack of availability of Desmodium seed.
  • Difficulty in establishing the Desmodium crop, hence practice not suitable for all farmers.

Resistant Varieties

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Resistant varieties are new crop varieties that improve yield production, are resistant to pests and diseases, more tolerant to drought, salinity or other changing or undesirable environmental conditions. Crop plants used within this practice are usually only resistant to a limited number of undesirable characteristics e.g. pests or drought – but usually not both, and some other desirable traits may be lost while others may be strengthened. Hence, careful selection of candidate species must be undertaken. Resistance varieties common in southern Africa include drought resistant maize, sorghum, rice and cowpea (beneficial legume for intercropping) strains, striga (witch weed) resistant sorghum and maize strains, and others all help farmers adapt to changing climate conditions, by being able to farm crops that survive the increasingly variable climate, which can result in less rainfall, or the presence of new pests. Striga results in crop losses totalling over USD 1 billion per year, whereas research has shown that planting climate resilient maize varieties can lead to up to a 25 % increase in crop yields.

Exploring new pest or drought resistant varieties in a regional will require demonstration and testing in ‘test plots’, so extension workers can ensure that the outcomes are aligned with farmers wants/needs/tastes, and so farmers are familiar with the new varieties before they are mainstreamed. Acceptance of new varieties, and any changes is traits will be critical, as resistant varieties is a key intervention for climate adaptation in southern Africa, as they will allow farmers to remain productive for longer under challenging conditions, and while different crops altogether are investigated.

Technical Application

To effectively leverage resistant varieties, the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Survey farmers and meet with other local and national level extension officers to determine key interventions required – drought tolerance, prevalence of certain pests, etc.
  • Step 2: Research and meet other local extension officers to discuss best methods applied to the agricultural practice of resistant varieties in the region.
  • Step 3: Talk to the agricultural dealers and seed manufacturers about the varieties being offered and their characteristics.
  • Step 4: Talk to the agricultural research departments about best opportunities under climatic change in your specific area.
  • Step 5: Either independently or in partnership with seed manufacturers, establish test plots of viable resistant varieties in key locations to act as demonstration plots for farmers to visit, observe growth and harvest, and test the outcomes. Many conditions may come into play when attempting to mainstream resistant varieties, including visual aspects, harvesting and processing differences, palatability and taste, etc. All of these issues must be discussed with farmers during testing and roll-out to ensure resources are not wasted with varieties that will fail.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced incidence of pests and disease results in higher yields.
Increase Resilience
Healthier and more pest resilient farm and landscape. Prediction of pest outbreaks enables earlier management decisions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced losses result in lowering GHG emissions per tonne produced
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_57_ResistantVarieties_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • The practice is widely used to increase yield production, produce pest and disease resistant varieties and improve environmental tolerance.
  • Further combines the best traits of the parental forms resulting in some strengths and weaknesses, resulting in a variation of crops species.

Drawbacks

  • May require investment and/or access to credit, as new seeds will not be in farmer seed banks/stores and may be expensive to kick-start implementation.
  • May take time to launch new varieties and gain acceptance from farmers/consumers/markets.

Continuous Long Term Proactive Practices

Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cultural pest control practices Are pest control management measures to control pests (insects, diseases, weeds) by manipulation of the environment or implementation of preventive practices including using plants that are resistant to pests, raising the mowing height of pastures to shade out weeds, aerating pastures to reduce compaction and plant stress. Several beneficial cultural practices can meet both demands, helping with pest and disease control and minimizing the use of toxic chemicals. In the insect pest management context, cultural practices may be considered as specific crop production practices that may be implemented either in the initial stages of the organic farm plan but also as a continuous plan to reduce the likelihood of insect pest infestation to a crop and damage. They form part of the Integrated Pest management (IPM) Practices and are based on tactics to disrupt pest infestation of crops by having the crop unavailable to pests in space and time, making the crop unacceptable to pests by interfering with host preference or location, reducing pest survival on the crop by enhancing natural enemies, altering the crop’s susceptibility to pests. The tactics or methods used in IPM include one or a combination of the following: Cultural control (crop rotation, use of locally adapted or pest resistant/tolerant varieties, sanitation, manipulating planting/harvest dates to avoid pests). Cultural pest control or IPM results in reduced pests/diseases and increased yields and is a climate-smart practice as its emphasis of prevention helps to control pests and diseases before they occur;  its continuous long-term practices without use of chemicals encourage healthier and more pest resilient crops and landscapes, encouraging the use of beneficial insects  making it an adaptation benefit. The possibility of prediction and recognition of pest outbreaks enables earlier management consultations and decisions. The reduction in losses results in lower GHG emissions per tonne produced.

Technical Application

To effectively implement continuous long-term use of cultural practices, the following steps, as part of the Integrated Pest Management (IPM)  should be carried out, but before taking any pest control action, IPM first sets an action threshold, a point at which pest populations or environmental conditions indicate that pest control action must be taken:

  • Step 1: Inspection. The cornerstone of an effective IPM program is a schedule of regular inspections. This should be regular to identify any new visitors to your crop.
  • Step 2: Preventive Action: regular inspections reveal vulnerabilities in your pest management program, steps can be taken to address them before they cause a real problem. One of the most effective prevention measures is exclusion, i.e., performing structural maintenance e.g by closing potential entry points revealed during inspection thereby physically keeping pests out and hence reducing the need for chemical control.
  • Step 3: Identification: Different pests have different behaviours. By identifying the problematic species, pests can be eliminated more efficiently and with the least risk of harm to other organisms. Professional pest management always starts with the correct identification of the pest in question.
  • Step 4: Analysis: Once you have properly identified the pest, you need to figure out why the pest is in your facility, e.g. food debris or moisture accumulation that may be attracting it? What about odors, through floors or cracks, etc.
  • Step 5: Treatment Selection: Cultural or IPM stresses the use of non-chemical control methods, such as exclusion or trapping, before chemical options. When other control methods have failed or are inappropriate for the situation, chemicals may be used in least volatile formulations in targeted areas to treat the specific pests- use the right treatments in the right places, and only as much as you need to get the job done.
  • Step 6: Monitoring: Constantly monitoring your facility for pest activity and facility and operational changes can protect against infestation and help eliminate existing ones. Your agricultural extension officer can assist you in technical advice to keep pests away.
  • Step 7: Documentation: Up-to-date pest control documentation is important and could include scope of service, pest activity reports, service reports, corrective action reports, trap layout maps, lists of approved pesticides, pesticide usage reports and applicator licenses
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduced incidence of pests and disease results in higher yields.
Increase Resilience
Healthier and more pest resilient farm and landscape. Prediction of pest outbreaks enables earlier management decisions.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduced losses result in lowering GHG emissions per tonne produced.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_56_ContiniousLongTermProactivePractices_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • This practice increases yield production, improves soil erosion, enhances soil quality and biological diversity.
  • Reduces pollution of soil, water, allows for pollinating insects to thrive, encourages microbe activity in soil formation

Assists with mitigation of GHG emissions.

Drawbacks

  • Consistent management of pest monitoring, pest prevention and agro-ecosystem management.
Subscribe to Positive

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported