Skip to main content

Weed Control

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Weeds are any unwanted plant species that compete with crops for sunlight, water, nutrients, air and space, hindering crop growth and in some cases are even toxic to crop plants. Weed control measures can be applied in an integrated manner to help prevent the growth and spread of weeds in agricultural systems. An integrated weed management approach aims to restrict weed growth until a crop is well established and can outcompete weeds. This integrated approach includes biological, chemical, cultural and/or physical tactics to combat weed spread and growth and these practices can be more cost effective than herbicide applications. Integrated weed management is climate smart as it combines multiple climate smart practices that increase farmers resilience, limits GHG releases and increases productivity. Options for weed control include crop rotation, intercropping, cover crops (which can be used as green manure or mulch), mulching, seed-bed preparation, livestock grazing, seed/variety selection, mowing, and hand-weeding.

The application of integrated weed control is climate smart as it reduces herbicide application and reduction in machinery usage (i.e. through no-tillage practices).

Technical Application

To effectively undertake weed control measures:

  • Step 1: Review weed control measures - crop rotation, intercropping, cover crops, mulching, seed-bed preparation, livestock grazing, seed/variety selection, mowing, hand-weeding and adjustments to tillage practices - and determine which methods are available and appropriate for the farming system and farmer. Two or more of these techniques can be applied to assist in ensuring farmers have more chance of success. Understand possible negative impacts of each weed control method.
  • Step 2: Improve weed identification knowledge in specific areas.
  • Step 3: Prevent weeds from spreading – clean clothes, animals, machinery, vehicles to limit weed transport; use only well stored/rotted manure (4-5 months) (Knowledge Product 16), include fencing, irrigation and other farm ‘breaks’ where possible
  • Step 4: Apply a combination of weed control methods including – cover crops (Technical Brief 15), mulching, intercropping (Technical Brief 07), crop rotation (Technical Brief 09), livestock grazing, seed selection (Technical Brief 20), mowing, hand-weeding. Try to avoid the application of herbicides, tillage and burning.
  • Step 5: monitor and document most effective weed management strategies for each farmer, and use lessons learned from the area with other farmers where applicable.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Weed control supports agricultural productivity by removing competition while reducing the need for herbicides.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_19_WeedControl_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Integrated weed management involves employing two or more climate smart practices.
  • Reduced consumption of chemicals
  • Cost effective methods that do not require additional inputs.

Drawbacks

  • More time consuming than applying herbicides or other more destructive methods.
  • Strategy requires careful planning.
  • May not be 100% effective.

Erosion Control

Value Chain
Topography
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Erosion control measures are practices designed to reduce runoff water and wind erosion that wash away top soil and nutrients, degrading soil biodiversity and reducing agricultural productivity. Erosion is a natural, biophysical process resulting from rainfall, water flows, wind, or storm runoff. Erosion is integral to the formation of soils, however human and animal activity, including agriculture and clearing of land, can accelerate erosive processes, drastically impacting landscapes, soils (e.g. quality) and watercourses. In addition, erosion control measures can contribute to reducing rainfall runoff, increased water infiltration into the soil, and attenuates flooding. The intensity of rainfall is directly correlated with the severity of soil erosion; hence, this is a significant problem across the Southern African region as much of the rainfall in the region is episodic, and intense. To prevent or reduce erosive processes control measures can be incorporated into farming systems to reduce or reverse degradation and potentially restore or improve soil quality. Erosion control measures aim to mitigate soil erosion and improve soil fertility by reducing flow and speed of run-off to avoid soil being washed away. Erosion control can be initiated through a number of interventions, including, but not limited to, intercropping (e.g. planting cover crops), mulch, conservation tillage and reforestation, as well as terracing, soil bunds, etc.. Example: Stone Bunds. Lessons learned from West Africa show that stone bunds constructed along contour lines in fields and in key run-off locations can significantly reduce run-off, particularly in steeper agricultural fields. The stone lines reinforce the soil structure in the field following the contours of the land, reducing the speed and volume of run-off, thereby reducing the likelihood of erosion. This is an appropriate technology to implement on slopes up to 15 to 20 degrees. This is considered a climate smart practice as it maintains soil structure and nutrients, in turn retaining carbon in soil, enabling farmers to adapt to climate changes and sustain agricultural productivity.

Technical Application

Without a topographic survey, this technology may require trial and error to begin with, to see how rainfall and run-off responds to the contouring. To effectively implement erosion control measures the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Perform a thorough local study of the landscape, soils, land use and erosive processes that most impact the area: steep slopes, flood plains, high winds etc.
  • Step 2: Source a large number of stones, preferably five to ten centimetres square blocks (from a quarry) or five to ten-centimetre diameter cobbles (from a river-bed). You will need 30 to 50 tonnes of stone per hectare for contour bunds approximately 300 metres long.
  • Step 3: Mark out contours, as discussed in Technical Brief 16 Contour Planting.
  • Step 4: In larger fields with shallower slopes, place stones in rows of two along contour line, interlocking alternately, burying the lower half. The bunds can be between 25 and 40 metres apart. On steeper slopes, stack and bury stones against or in vertical/near vertical walls of contours much closer together (five to ten metres apart) to reinforce them.
  • Step 5: Make sure that stone bunds follow the contours from one side of the field to the other, ensuring that no ‘pour’ points (larger gaps) exist along the way, lining the drainage channel or weir from one contour to the next with stones to avoid or reduce scouring in these locations.
  • Step 6: Following, and if possible, during rainfall events, check the stability of the slope, adjusting stone bunds where necessary.
  • Step 7: At the end of the rainy season and again following harvest, review the performance of the technology, and prepare for the next growing season.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Increased water infiltration can extend growing period and mitigates short dry spells. Can reduce flood risk downstream.
Increase Resilience
Increased production due to improved nutrient availability and higher nutrient use efficiency.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Depending on practices used, may lock more carbon into the soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_11_ErosionControl_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Erosion control measures prevent the loss of top soils and nutrients.
  • Can help farmers adapt to changes in climate that have include increased rainfall amounts and intensity.
  • Can reduce the impact of wind erosion.

Drawbacks

  • Erosion is a natural process that can be increased due to human and animal activity.
  • Requires substantial labour inputs to construct bunds and other erosion control measures
  • Maintenance is also needed.

Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM)

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) refers to a set of agricultural practices that can be applied simultaneously to improve agricultural productivity through increasing soil nutrients and improving crop water use. ISFM includes a broad range of agricultural practices that have all been adapted to local conditions to improve soil nutrients and include the combined application of the following approaches:

  1. Utilisation of organic fertilisers such as green manure, compost and crop residues.
  2. Application of locally available soil amendment methods, such as lime and biochar.
  3. Implementation of techniques like germplasm, agroforestry, crop rotation, intercropping etc.
  4. Limited use of inorganic or mineral fertilisers – seen as the last option in ISFM, when other interventions are not achieving optimal results.

ISFM can be successful for most arable farmers and has been known to double productivity and increase farm-level incomes by 20 to 50 percent if implemented correctly. It focuses on a series of practical approaches to sustainable farm productivity through locally available and affordable options for maintaining soil fertility and productivity, and is seen as a viable approach to reduce over-reliance on inorganic fertiliser. ISFM permits short- and long-term increases in productivity of cash crops and food security, and is considered climate smart as the combined ISFM approach maximises fertiliser uptake and sequestration of carbon in soil, allowing sustainable agricultural intensification driven by improved soil structure and fertility.

Technical Application

In addition to agricultural inputs and the following technical implementation steps, ISFM requires the farmer to consider farm size (land area), and property rights (land tenure) to ensure that investments are efficient and sustainable.

To implement ISFM approaches, the following should be considered:

  • Step 1: Prepare a needs assessment based on understanding of farm challenges – low or declining productivity, soil fertility, low organic content, etc
  • Step 2: Measure fields that require attention to understand volumes of inputs required.
  • Step 3: Develop (or update) an agricultural calendar to use as a platform for discussion between farmer(s) extension officer(s).
  • Step 4: Develop plan and schedule/programme of locally appropriate ISFM interventions between farmer(s) and extension officer(s), obtaining guidance from agricultural suppliers where necessary (lime application, etc). As ISFM is a blended approach, the plan should consider short and medium to long term interventions and outcomes.
  • Step 5: Examine cost implications of the plan, revising where necessary based upon available resources, and if necessary/available apply for credit to fund investments.
  • Step 6: Assess labour requirements within the ISFM plan to ensure that they can be fulfilled, and considerations of gender and youth have been accommodated – women are not expected to do the majority of work, and children are not missing school.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Improves soil structure. Increases soil fertility.
Increase Resilience
Aims at sustainable intensification, increasing resilience through more predictable production.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ISFM has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions owing to greater uptake of Nitrogen-based fertilisers by crops and soil carbon sequestration.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_06_ISFM_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Applying an ISFM approach can be a sustainable way to improve/rehabilitate soil fertility.
  • ISFM is intended to optimise a combination of CSA strategies to achieve maximum outcomes.
  • The focus should be on leveraging locally available materials and resources to improve productivity.
  • ISFM should be seen as a scalable approach, involving a range of interventions that match available inputs and financial and human resources.

Drawbacks

  • Lack of knowledge of applying the different strategies individually or in combination.
  • Potentially high transaction costs as the process involves multiple interventions.
  • Lack of credit facilities.
  • Availability of labour.

Lime Treatment of Soil

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Soil acidification is a widespread problem across southern Africa, often driven by monocropping with cereals and occurring as a result of erosion, compost decomposition and soil leaching. Applying lime to soil is regarded as a key management practice in agriculture to balance pH, enhancing crop productivity, water penetration and absorption of major nutrients by crops. Most crops grow best in soils with a pH between 6.5 and 6.8. Acidity constrains crop growth below pH levels of 5.5. Agricultural lime is limestone mined as a rock that is crushed into various particle sizes ranging from course to fine particles and can be applied in areas where there is high soil-acidity due to high levels of manganese and iron. Lime texture also determines the speed of absorption in the soil; that is, fine-lime reacts more quickly than more granular lime. However, the use of lime must be managed appropriately to avoid losing other nutrients in the soil. This practice is considered climate smart as it assists with adaptation strategies through improvement of soil fertility, whilst improving productivity at modest application rates, noting that annual application is not recommended.

Technical Application

Before applying lime to increase lower soil pH the following should be considered. Equipment required: soil pH testing kit, protective goggles and mask, agricultural lime, shovels/forks/hoes, and disk harrow, drag harrow or hoe if available.

  • Step 1: Use a pH testing strip to determine soil pH levels, making sure to test surface and sub-surface acidity.
  • Step 2: Measure area of land to be treated in order to determine amount of lime for purchase. Application should be calculated as metric tonne per hectare, depending on soil pH and crop. Lime requirements will differ depending on soil type and level of acidity in the soil. Application volumes can be guided by suppliers.
  • Step 3: Purchase lime according to requirements from agricultural supplier. Savings could be realised if purchasing as a group of farmers.
  • Step 4: Apply lime to the soils at least two months prior to planting directly after harvesting to allow the lime to react with the soil, and positively impact the pH.
  • Step 5: Mix lime and soil well in order to reduce soil acidity. This is normally achieved through disk tilling but can be done manually using a drag harrow or hoe. However, this can be an intensive process.
  • Step 6: Test pH prior to planting to ensure amendments have improved soil pH.
  • Step 7: Plant crops. Monitor crop performance, and harvest results with a view to understanding impact of lime treatment.
  • Step 8: Following harvest, test soil pH again.

Application of lime can be part of an Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) practices.

While a practical solution, this soil amendment should be informed by research and discussion with extension officers and lime suppliers. On-farm storage and management of lime should be included in this dialogue.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Significant increases in productivity.
Increase Resilience
Sustainable improvements to soil fertility. Application is not required every year.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_05_AddingLime_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Lime treatment can assist farmers to balance pH in acidic soils, optimising water and nutrient use for crop plant growth.
  • A practical and effective way to combat the negative effects of erosion, compost decomposition and leaching on soil.
  • Lime does not need to applied to soil every year.

Drawbacks

  • Adding lime to soils is laborious and should not be considered a short-term solution to balancing soil pH.
  • Over-application or overuse of lime can negatively affect soil quality.

Organic Fertilisers

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Soil fertility is one of the most critical factors needs to be maintained so farmers can continue to grow productive and nutritious crops, especially in southern Africa where soils are often fragile and lacking in plant nutrients. Soils are often quickly depleted if mismanaged, further exacerbated by natural biophysical processes such as rain, wind and/or heat. The use of organic fertiliser can help farmers to improve soil fertility, as they improve absorption of water and add nutrients into the soil, drastically improving crop production. Organic fertilisers are plant (crop residues) or animal-based materials, such as green manure, worm mouldings, compost, animal waste, and sewage residues, many of which may be readily available on the farm, or within a farming community. These products are potential counters to inorganic fertilisers - artificially manufactured chemicals (synthetic) mined from mineral deposits comprising minerals such as nitrogen, phosphorus and magnesium - which are often costly when few farmers can access credit needed to sustainably access such materials. Organic fertilisers are considered climate smart as they utilise (recycle) readily available organic materials to feed soil and crops simultaneously as they add nutrients into the soil and condition it, and thus increase productivity and resilience, while inorganic fertilisers add nutrients to the soil only, and are often expensive.

Technical Application

Organic fertilisers can be produced at the household level or purchased. On-farm production includes stock-piling animal manure, crop residues, and other organic waste, following appropriate guidance for processing and usage.

To apply organic fertilisers the following should be considered:

  • Step 1: Assess field area where fertiliser is to be applied, and fertiliser needs – poor crop performance, low organic matter content, etc.
  • Step 2: Ensure that fertiliser is available in sufficient quantities for application in all target or priority fields.
  • Step 3: Ensure organic fertiliser – especially green manure/crop residues – are broken-down/chopped to aid breakdown/integration with soil.
  • Step 4: Monitor soil nutrient levels and crop performance (in the light of prevailing climatic conditions) to determine success of organic fertilisers.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Improves efficiency and crop yields.
Increase Resilience
Greater production and efficiency results in increased food security and resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Locks more carbon in the soil and reduces need for inorganic fertilisers.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_04_OrganicFertilisers_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Fertilisers can help restore soil nutrients, improve soil conditions and improve crop production if applied correctly.
  • Organic fertilisers are plant or animal materials that can be produced locally or purchased for application.
  • An appropriate strategy in rural and low-income communities with small holder farmers that can generally not afford synthetic pesticides and inorganic fertilisers.
  • Collective action can minimise the financial cost of implementing organic fertilisers, in terms of shared transportation and storage costs, as well as bulk purchasing power.
  • Use of organic fertilisers can help avoids the leaching of inorganic fertilisers into waterways, which can result in eutrophication.
  • Where farmers do have access to financial resources and/or credit, organic fertilisers should be used in combinate with inorganic application.

Drawbacks

  • Manure and other types of organic fertilisers require management, and relevant storage mechanisms. If not stored correctly, investment can be lost as nutrients can be lost due to exposure to the elements.
  • It can be costly to transport if sourcing from off-farm
  • Weed seeds can be present in manure, increasing labour requirements for weeding.
  • If not produced on-farm, organic fertilisers, while beneficial can require access to sustainable financial resources or credit to implement correctly.
  • Requires extension support to ensure that fertiliser requirements are being met.
Subscribe to Medium

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported