Skip to main content

Cut and Carry

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Cut and carry is the agricultural practice of cutting and carrying fodder crops away from the field that they are grown in to feed to livestock. Fodder trees, shrubs or grasses are sources for livestock feed in this practice. Cut and Carry is a key CSA practice where overgrazing is a problem. This practice takes pressure off grazing land at critical periods, reduces land degradation caused by livestock and increases soil organic matter, while still feeding livestock for productive outcomes. This practice can also be used in more intensive livestock production where livestock are kept housed for periods stretching from half a year to a year and improved nutrition is required. However, fodder production can be costly in terms of cultivation, requiring significant management over and above the livestock themselves. Fodder is collected from sites where it grows naturally, or it can be grown in fodder banks, hedges, boundaries, etc. Feeding livestock using this approach can ensure the supply of a large quantity of high quality and palatable fodder within a short time, as well ensuring soil is not disturbed through open grazing systems, thus a good CSA practice. It can be adapted to the farmer’s needs and can provide a way of introducing the farmer to the concept of improving livestock at the same time as conserving soil.

Technical Application

To effectively implement cut and carry systems:

  • Step 1: Cut and carry commences with the cutting of the crop.
  • Step 2: Cut crop when plants are fully mature (vegetative growth and plant sugars are at their peak). This ensures that protein, digestible energy and dry matter percentage are at their highest potential.
  • Step 3: Fodder can be fed directly or dried as hay or preserved as silage to conserve its value and be fed to livestock during the dry season or other critical times throughout the year.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Fodder can be harvested on multiple occasions during times of plenty and preserved for later, rather than leaving as standing hay.
Increase Resilience
Reduces pressure of grazing by limiting period livestock tread on land causing denudation at critical periods (with less cover).
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_46_CutAndCarry_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Improves fodder production and farm income.
  • Growing fodder crops in rainy seasons encourages fodder conservation for dry season feeding.
  • Can be combined with crop rotation and intercropping to form part of positive farm management practices.
  • Cut and carry can relieve pressure from pasture and grazing land, contributing to control of over-grazing, while improving soil quality.
  • Can create job opportunities and income generation for youth farmers.

Drawbacks

  • The practice will require additional labour resources.
  • Can be costly in terms of management.
  • Farmers must have enough land to grow fodder on or have access to communal land.
  • Soil condition in the fodder fields must be carefully monitored to ensure that soil nutrients aren’t depleting.
  • Fodder storage must be monitored to ensure bacteria and mould do not affect the quality of feed.

Physical Storage Options

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Grains are stored to reduce the opportunities for loss, damage or infestation by pests. On the farm grain storage can be short-term (>3 months) before it is moved to the supply chain, long term (3-12 months) while farmers store it for home consumption, to sell when prices are more favourable or for planting in the next season. During this phase of post-harvest processing, grains can be stored in bags, silos or other bulk storage containers. Bag storage utilises permeable sacks that will allow air movement in and out of the bag. Structures can be built to store grains and solid-wall bins or silos should be used in areas where grains can be dried properly. Other options include airtight underground pits, steel bins, while concrete silos and warehouses can also be used as storage options. While storing grains to ensure favourable storage, facilities should be kept clean, covered, and never exposed to the elements.  However, pest control measures need to be established, such as adhering to acceptable grain moisture content levels at storage to deter insect infestation, as pests (rodents, insects, etc.) can devastate grains in storage. Physical storage options are built to meet the demand and supply of grains season-to-season and to make seeds available for the next planting season.

Technical Application

To effectively implement Physical Storage Options:

  • Step 1: When making a choice of which storage option to choose, farmers must consider the type of crop to be stored, storage requirements of the crop and the form in which the crop must be stored (for 0-6months/3-12months).
  • Step 2: Grains must be stored in a dry place with a constant temperature.
  • Step 3: Crops should be dried and have low moisture content prior to storage.
  • Step 4: Airtight containers should be used to avoid insect infestation.
  • Step 5: Based on farmer resources and time of storage, there are a number of containers that can be utilised to store harvested crops including metal silos, polythene sacks (that can be layered), mud silos, plastic bags.
  • Step 6: As a last measure, insecticides in the form of a powder can be applied to harvested crops. The powder comes in pre-measured packets and are low dosage so generally safe to handle. Information is provided on each packet and should be read before integrating it into the crop. Grain needs to be cleaned before consumption.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Reduces losses during storage.
Increase Resilience
Storage that is protected from flooding, extreme rain and heat will protect grain. Potential to store until prices are higher and increase income.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
More efficient use of resources.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_39_PhyscialStorageOptions_0.3_2019-07-18_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Storage options can support food security and assist farmers respond to supply and demand, leveraging favourable market prices and conditions.
  • Suitable for short- and long-term storage.

Drawbacks

  • Uncontrolled grain moisture may lead to insect infestation and loss in grain.
  • Insect fumigation may contaminate grains.

Drip Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Drip irrigation is a method of slow delivery of water to crops, through highly-controlled flow management, applied along the soil or at the sub-surface level directly to crop root systems. Drip irrigation is an effective system for conserving water while ensuring that it is used optimally without losing it to evaporation through high efficiency water delivery. Drip irrigation involves establishing a network of tubes, values and pipes connected to water source by a pump, along crop rows. A water source is required which is a drawback as many dryland areas lack these water sources. Drip irrigation is a climate smart option as it increases farmer resilience to the effects of climate change.

Technical Application

To effectively implement drip irrigation:

  • Step 1: A reliable water source must be available - natural (natural or through rain-water harvesting).
  • Step 2: Acquire a pump system (approximately $US 100) that maintains enough pressure to deliver water through the system or an elevated tank.
  • Step 3: Connect lines or hoses and laterals that run from the pump system across the planted fields.
  • Step 4: Run lines or hoses with emitters (drippers) or small punctures at the surface level along planted crops or just below the surface providing water to the roots system of the plants.
  • Step 5: Once the system is operable, the pump can be turned on and water dispersed as required by the nature of the crop and can also be implemented with supplemental irrigation strategies (Technical Brief 23).
  • Step 6: Monitor the irrigation system regularly to ensure there are no malfunctions and the system is maintained. Crops that receive regular water can develop shallow root systems and any prolonged disruptions in service could have   significant impacts.
  • Step 7: If applying drip irrigation in sloped conditions, follow the contours of the slope as outlined in Technical Brief 16.

Once a drip irrigation system is up and running, farmers can explore fertigation, the addition of soluble fertilisers into the irrigation system water for distribution directly to plants.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Energy saving.
Increase Resilience
Increase crop yield.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Continued production in changing environments.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_24_DripIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Maximises efficiency in crop irrigation in dryland or variable climate conditions.
  • Minimizes the loss of water to evaporation.

Drawbacks

  • Requires consistent water source.
  • Costs of establishing the system, pump and lines/hoses can be significant depending on configuration, etc.
  • Requires continual monitoring and may need regular maintenance.

Solar Irrigation

Value Chain
Annual Average Rainfall
Soils
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Solar irrigation systems utilise solar energy to pump water to fields and distribute it through drip irrigation or other systems. Solar irrigation is a low-emission agricultural technology that replaces fossil fuel irrigation pumps reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This approach has the potential to reduce energy costs for irrigation and provide energy independence in rural areas. It provides opportunities to increase productivity by shifting from rainfed to irrigated agriculture in some areas. Solar irrigation systems require intensive management and regular monitoring to ensure the sustainable use of water resources. It requires maintenance of solar panels and irrigation equipment but can quickly yield a positive return on investment. Solar irrigation can be implemented for crop irrigation and livestock watering schemes and can improve food security, produce high value crops for sale, reduce energy costs and drive rural development. Although an expensive technology, solar irrigation can introduce significant operational savings if managed and maintained appropriately. It is considered a climate smart option as it can increase productivity, enable farms to adapt t climate changes and improve resilience, and the use of solar power reduces the use of on-grid, or diesel generator power, reducing emissions.

Technical Application

To effectively implement solar irrigation:

  • Step 1: To determine the solar pump system Crop water requirements, location, water sources etc. Do required research. Is water sourced from an above ground or below ground source?
  • Step 2: Source required materials to implement a solar irrigation system from regional or international suppliers including:
    • Photovoltaic (PV) panels to generate electricity (80-300 W system depending on context);
    • a structure to mount the panels;
    • a pump controller;
    • a surface or submersible water pump; and
    • a distribution system or storage tank for water.
  • Step 3: Identify funding sources as initial costs, as well as maintenance costs, must be considered and modelled prior to purchasing a system. There are regional and international solar irrigation producers.   These costs differ dramatically given the complexity of the context, starting at costs approximately USD $2,400 for equipment only. If drilling is necessary the cost increases significantly depending on depth, substrate etc.  Community-based investment, micro-leasing and rental services can be possible funding models to explore.
  • Step 4: Determine whether there is sufficient solar irradiation for the proposed area – consult and specialist; and/or the national meteorological service.
  • Step 5: Identify area suitable to install solar panels. The area should be easily accessible, and all trees/bush should be cleared. To determine most appropriate site and angle of panels, etc, consult an expert.
  • Step 6: The availability of technical expertise must be considered before implementation to ensure that any technical issues do not result in long period of service disruption.

Maintenance costs and expertise should be considered before installing solar irrigation systems. A detailed cost benefit analysis is advisable. Other key technical considerations include: Legal permits to extract water from the source as water extraction may impact community watershed levels.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Plants get enough water. Potential for two or more cropping seasons per year.
Increase Resilience
Predictable yields. Higher production equals increased food security/income and resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Significant reductions in CO2 emissions compared to grid and diesel-fuelled systems.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_22_SolarIrrigation_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Energy independence will introduce significant cost savings for farmers.
  • Solar powered irrigation can significantly boost productivity, due to increased ability to sustainably irrigate crops.
  • Consistent irrigation can help to mitigate climate impacts, and aid adaptation.
  • Reduces operational costs for diesel or on-grid power to pump water.
  • Reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

Drawbacks

  • Solar irrigation is expensive to implement and there are costs for maintenance. Therefore, savings or access to credit will be required.
  • Access to solar equipment, spares and parts, and the transportation of the above may be complicated and/or expensive.
  • Over and above cost and access technology, other issues such as access to land and water sources are important factors.

Crop Variety Selection

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Selecting crop varieties is a key resilience strategy for farmers facing changing climatic conditions. There are two types of seed varieties: traditional varieties and improved varieties. Traditional varieties have been selected by farmers for their special characteristics and due to many years of selecting the strongest seeds over generations, they are generally adapted to local natural conditions. In some respects, these seeds increase the chance of getting a return on investment in stable environments, but are less likely to mitigate GHG emissions. Traditional crop varieties are usually selected by small scale farmers due to their relatively low cost and availability and can be saved and replanted for further growing seasons. Improved varieties are seeds that have been altered by scientific processes to incorporate desired characteristics using techniques such as following pure line breeding, classical breeding, hybridisation and molecular breeding. Desirable characteristics include higher yields, shorter growing seasons, drought resistance, salt tolerance, etc. Improved varieties are selected when facing adverse conditions such as higher temperatures and/or less predictable rainfall and normally result in the efficient use of water reducing use of energy for irrigation systems. While these seeds offer improvements they are usually commercial products and as a result can be expensive. Furthermore, as they are sold by seed companies availability is driven by demand. Most seed companies protect enhancements using  intellectual property rights that legally limit seed saving and replanting of seeds. In fact, many of these seed varieties have been designed to prevent plants to be reseeded. Thus, seed varieties afford farmers the opportunity to incorporate crops that can be planted to exploit their unique characteristics – traditional or improved, assisting farmers to grow crops that are resilient to changing climates to produce crops that are market-appropriate.

Technical Application

To effectively undertake leverage traditional seed characteristics, or improved crop varieties  the following should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Prior to selecting seed varieties, perform a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) to identify how crops will perform and their benefits compared to the costs of the seed, considering the following:
    • Local  farming system(s): land availability per household, crops traditionally grown, access to inputs such as fertilisers,
    • Local environmental conditions: soil conditions, disease, pests, climatic conditions, occurrence of flooding/droughts and other natural disasters.
    • How climate change has impacted or will impact the farming system and how crop variety selection can be a climate- smart practice.
    • Local access to seeds – is seed collected at the householder level, do neighbours exchange seeds, do farmers have access to commercially produced seeds?  Are the costs for accessing commercial, improved seeds manageable or prohibitive? The CBA should weigh the benefits of a new seed against perceived actual or transactional costs for selecting a new seed.
  • Step 2: Obtain information and guidance from local experts, lead farmers, and government regarding best varieties to grow.
  • Step 3: Evaluate results of the CBA and select appropriate seeds that match the farm system/requirements, and available financial resources/access to credit.
  • Step 4: Plant test plots of selected seeds to understand if benefits are realised and demonstrate outcomes with farmers, showing possible alternatives and discuss implementation.
  • Step 5: Following full demonstration and discussion with farmers, implement at farm level – planting the first crop in accordance with guidance provided by seed provider, or traditional knowledge.

Consider in-country seed sources to access different varieties through local extension or research services. When buying seeds ensure that the seeds are adequately dry and look for seed that is certified by a national seed laboratory to ensure that the variety is the highest quality possible. Seeds should be properly stored to avoid high temperatures and humid air to reduce chances of early germination.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Selecting improved seed varieties allows the farmer to maintain agricultural productivity as the climate changes.
Increase Resilience
Selection of improved varieties may assist farmers adapt agricultural production to assist adaptation to climate change.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_20_CropVarietySelection_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Exploring crop variety is a key way for farmers to grow more resilient crops within the context of changing climatic conditions. Drought resistant or faster maturing varieties, for example, allow you to respond to reduced rainfall conditions.
  • Improved crop varieties have been altered by scientific processes to incorporate desired characteristics.
  • Understanding local context is important when researching the best crop variety for the area.

Drawbacks

  • Improved crop varieties are commercially sold and can be expensive as they often require additional inputs (inorganic fertilisers etc.)
  • Traditional crops have generally adapted to local climatic and landscape conditions, are widely available and are cost effective for local populations; however, these varieties may not be resilient to climatic changes, and are less likely to mitigate GHG emissions.

Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM)

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) refers to a set of agricultural practices that can be applied simultaneously to improve agricultural productivity through increasing soil nutrients and improving crop water use. ISFM includes a broad range of agricultural practices that have all been adapted to local conditions to improve soil nutrients and include the combined application of the following approaches:

  1. Utilisation of organic fertilisers such as green manure, compost and crop residues.
  2. Application of locally available soil amendment methods, such as lime and biochar.
  3. Implementation of techniques like germplasm, agroforestry, crop rotation, intercropping etc.
  4. Limited use of inorganic or mineral fertilisers – seen as the last option in ISFM, when other interventions are not achieving optimal results.

ISFM can be successful for most arable farmers and has been known to double productivity and increase farm-level incomes by 20 to 50 percent if implemented correctly. It focuses on a series of practical approaches to sustainable farm productivity through locally available and affordable options for maintaining soil fertility and productivity, and is seen as a viable approach to reduce over-reliance on inorganic fertiliser. ISFM permits short- and long-term increases in productivity of cash crops and food security, and is considered climate smart as the combined ISFM approach maximises fertiliser uptake and sequestration of carbon in soil, allowing sustainable agricultural intensification driven by improved soil structure and fertility.

Technical Application

In addition to agricultural inputs and the following technical implementation steps, ISFM requires the farmer to consider farm size (land area), and property rights (land tenure) to ensure that investments are efficient and sustainable.

To implement ISFM approaches, the following should be considered:

  • Step 1: Prepare a needs assessment based on understanding of farm challenges – low or declining productivity, soil fertility, low organic content, etc
  • Step 2: Measure fields that require attention to understand volumes of inputs required.
  • Step 3: Develop (or update) an agricultural calendar to use as a platform for discussion between farmer(s) extension officer(s).
  • Step 4: Develop plan and schedule/programme of locally appropriate ISFM interventions between farmer(s) and extension officer(s), obtaining guidance from agricultural suppliers where necessary (lime application, etc). As ISFM is a blended approach, the plan should consider short and medium to long term interventions and outcomes.
  • Step 5: Examine cost implications of the plan, revising where necessary based upon available resources, and if necessary/available apply for credit to fund investments.
  • Step 6: Assess labour requirements within the ISFM plan to ensure that they can be fulfilled, and considerations of gender and youth have been accommodated – women are not expected to do the majority of work, and children are not missing school.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Improves soil structure. Increases soil fertility.
Increase Resilience
Aims at sustainable intensification, increasing resilience through more predictable production.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ISFM has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions owing to greater uptake of Nitrogen-based fertilisers by crops and soil carbon sequestration.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_06_ISFM_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Applying an ISFM approach can be a sustainable way to improve/rehabilitate soil fertility.
  • ISFM is intended to optimise a combination of CSA strategies to achieve maximum outcomes.
  • The focus should be on leveraging locally available materials and resources to improve productivity.
  • ISFM should be seen as a scalable approach, involving a range of interventions that match available inputs and financial and human resources.

Drawbacks

  • Lack of knowledge of applying the different strategies individually or in combination.
  • Potentially high transaction costs as the process involves multiple interventions.
  • Lack of credit facilities.
  • Availability of labour.

Lime Treatment of Soil

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Soil acidification is a widespread problem across southern Africa, often driven by monocropping with cereals and occurring as a result of erosion, compost decomposition and soil leaching. Applying lime to soil is regarded as a key management practice in agriculture to balance pH, enhancing crop productivity, water penetration and absorption of major nutrients by crops. Most crops grow best in soils with a pH between 6.5 and 6.8. Acidity constrains crop growth below pH levels of 5.5. Agricultural lime is limestone mined as a rock that is crushed into various particle sizes ranging from course to fine particles and can be applied in areas where there is high soil-acidity due to high levels of manganese and iron. Lime texture also determines the speed of absorption in the soil; that is, fine-lime reacts more quickly than more granular lime. However, the use of lime must be managed appropriately to avoid losing other nutrients in the soil. This practice is considered climate smart as it assists with adaptation strategies through improvement of soil fertility, whilst improving productivity at modest application rates, noting that annual application is not recommended.

Technical Application

Before applying lime to increase lower soil pH the following should be considered. Equipment required: soil pH testing kit, protective goggles and mask, agricultural lime, shovels/forks/hoes, and disk harrow, drag harrow or hoe if available.

  • Step 1: Use a pH testing strip to determine soil pH levels, making sure to test surface and sub-surface acidity.
  • Step 2: Measure area of land to be treated in order to determine amount of lime for purchase. Application should be calculated as metric tonne per hectare, depending on soil pH and crop. Lime requirements will differ depending on soil type and level of acidity in the soil. Application volumes can be guided by suppliers.
  • Step 3: Purchase lime according to requirements from agricultural supplier. Savings could be realised if purchasing as a group of farmers.
  • Step 4: Apply lime to the soils at least two months prior to planting directly after harvesting to allow the lime to react with the soil, and positively impact the pH.
  • Step 5: Mix lime and soil well in order to reduce soil acidity. This is normally achieved through disk tilling but can be done manually using a drag harrow or hoe. However, this can be an intensive process.
  • Step 6: Test pH prior to planting to ensure amendments have improved soil pH.
  • Step 7: Plant crops. Monitor crop performance, and harvest results with a view to understanding impact of lime treatment.
  • Step 8: Following harvest, test soil pH again.

Application of lime can be part of an Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) practices.

While a practical solution, this soil amendment should be informed by research and discussion with extension officers and lime suppliers. On-farm storage and management of lime should be included in this dialogue.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Significant increases in productivity.
Increase Resilience
Sustainable improvements to soil fertility. Application is not required every year.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_05_AddingLime_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Lime treatment can assist farmers to balance pH in acidic soils, optimising water and nutrient use for crop plant growth.
  • A practical and effective way to combat the negative effects of erosion, compost decomposition and leaching on soil.
  • Lime does not need to applied to soil every year.

Drawbacks

  • Adding lime to soils is laborious and should not be considered a short-term solution to balancing soil pH.
  • Over-application or overuse of lime can negatively affect soil quality.

Organic Fertilisers

Value Chain
Soils
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Soil fertility is one of the most critical factors needs to be maintained so farmers can continue to grow productive and nutritious crops, especially in southern Africa where soils are often fragile and lacking in plant nutrients. Soils are often quickly depleted if mismanaged, further exacerbated by natural biophysical processes such as rain, wind and/or heat. The use of organic fertiliser can help farmers to improve soil fertility, as they improve absorption of water and add nutrients into the soil, drastically improving crop production. Organic fertilisers are plant (crop residues) or animal-based materials, such as green manure, worm mouldings, compost, animal waste, and sewage residues, many of which may be readily available on the farm, or within a farming community. These products are potential counters to inorganic fertilisers - artificially manufactured chemicals (synthetic) mined from mineral deposits comprising minerals such as nitrogen, phosphorus and magnesium - which are often costly when few farmers can access credit needed to sustainably access such materials. Organic fertilisers are considered climate smart as they utilise (recycle) readily available organic materials to feed soil and crops simultaneously as they add nutrients into the soil and condition it, and thus increase productivity and resilience, while inorganic fertilisers add nutrients to the soil only, and are often expensive.

Technical Application

Organic fertilisers can be produced at the household level or purchased. On-farm production includes stock-piling animal manure, crop residues, and other organic waste, following appropriate guidance for processing and usage.

To apply organic fertilisers the following should be considered:

  • Step 1: Assess field area where fertiliser is to be applied, and fertiliser needs – poor crop performance, low organic matter content, etc.
  • Step 2: Ensure that fertiliser is available in sufficient quantities for application in all target or priority fields.
  • Step 3: Ensure organic fertiliser – especially green manure/crop residues – are broken-down/chopped to aid breakdown/integration with soil.
  • Step 4: Monitor soil nutrient levels and crop performance (in the light of prevailing climatic conditions) to determine success of organic fertilisers.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Improves efficiency and crop yields.
Increase Resilience
Greater production and efficiency results in increased food security and resilience.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Locks more carbon in the soil and reduces need for inorganic fertilisers.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_04_OrganicFertilisers_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Fertilisers can help restore soil nutrients, improve soil conditions and improve crop production if applied correctly.
  • Organic fertilisers are plant or animal materials that can be produced locally or purchased for application.
  • An appropriate strategy in rural and low-income communities with small holder farmers that can generally not afford synthetic pesticides and inorganic fertilisers.
  • Collective action can minimise the financial cost of implementing organic fertilisers, in terms of shared transportation and storage costs, as well as bulk purchasing power.
  • Use of organic fertilisers can help avoids the leaching of inorganic fertilisers into waterways, which can result in eutrophication.
  • Where farmers do have access to financial resources and/or credit, organic fertilisers should be used in combinate with inorganic application.

Drawbacks

  • Manure and other types of organic fertilisers require management, and relevant storage mechanisms. If not stored correctly, investment can be lost as nutrients can be lost due to exposure to the elements.
  • It can be costly to transport if sourcing from off-farm
  • Weed seeds can be present in manure, increasing labour requirements for weeding.
  • If not produced on-farm, organic fertilisers, while beneficial can require access to sustainable financial resources or credit to implement correctly.
  • Requires extension support to ensure that fertiliser requirements are being met.
Subscribe to Yes

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported