Skip to main content

Relay Cropping

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Relay cropping is a form of intercropping where two or more crops are grown simultaneously during part of their life cycles. Intercropping often involves maize and legumes, which increases nitrogen fixing in soils and increased biomass production. The second (or succeeding) crop is planted after the reproductive stage (flowering) of the existing crop but before harvesting. Some of the advantages of relay cropping include better erosion control due to crop cover, reduced spreading of pests and diseases, and crop diversification, plus general soil health. As an added benefit, it mitigates the emission of greenhouse gases through reducing nitrate leaching and increasing carbon sequestration. There is also potential socio-economic benefits for farmers as in many cases relay cropping increases crop productivity.

However, this form of intercropping is not easily implemented in large-scale agricultural systems due to complications in weed control and challenges associated with operating mechanised equipment on fields with relay cropping.

Technical Application

To effectively implement relay cropping, the following steps should be carried out:

  • Step 1: Test/experiment with locally available crops to determine if they are complementary and can grow concurrently - cereal crops and legumes are complementary and can generally grow concurrently.
  • Step 2: Prepare land through clearing, weeding and a no-tillage approach (Technical Brief 12).
  • Step 3: Plant cereal crop first according to normal planting season schedule –during rainy season. Space this cereal crop 70 cm by 50 cm apart.
  • Step 4: Prior to cereal harvest, plant the legume crop between cereal crop rows with spacing based on legume planting efficiencies (researched prior to planting for optimum growth).
  • Step 5: After cereal has been harvested, bend the dried stalks down to provide more ground cover.
  • Step 6: When legumes are ready for harvest, collect the productive pod/seed/bean/nut and leave the stalk uprooted in the field to maximise ground cover.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
More efficient use of available resources. Increased yield from the same field.
Increase Resilience
If legume – maize/sorghum relays are employed the risk of crop loss is reduces and dietary diversity is enhanced.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Helps lock more carbon in the soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_08_RelayCropping_2019-10-17_0_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increased and diversified crop yield.
  • Improved soil quality preventing leaching, and introducing nutrients.
  • Increased land cover reducing erosion and improving carbon capturing.
  • Food security/farm income increase.

Drawbacks

  • Weeding makes this approach labour intensive, and planting and harvesting can become less efficient. This requires consideration, especially if women’s workload increases as a result.
  • Carried out precisely to ensure crops are compatible, planting is undertaken at correct times and harvesting is low impact to avoid crop damage.
  • Possible competition between plants for nutrients, water, space, etc.

Intercropping

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Intercropping is a process of growing multiple crops either together or in proximity to each other on one piece of land, thereby improving crop production, reducing and preventing land degradation and increasing crop output.

There are different methods of intercropping:

  • Mixed intercropping – two or more crops are seeded together and harvested together.
  • Row/strip intercropping – two or more crops planted on the same field but planted in alternate rows.

Crops selected for intercropping should not have similar properties or compete but should be selected to complement one another and be mutually beneficial. For example, deep rooted crops can be intercropped with shallow rooted crops, so as to not compete for water or nutrients. Intercropping helps achieve ecological benefits not possible with monocropping systems. Intercropping is commonly practiced for maize-legume systems, where legumes introduce nitrogen into the soil benefiting maize production and improving soil fertility during crop growth. Furthermore, the legume crops can be utilised for fodder for livestock. This practice is particularly beneficial for smallholder farmers, who can grow multiple crops on small plots to receive multiple benefits including improving production/yields, and increasing household food security. Intercropping is also a climate-smart practice as it mitigates farmer risk to climate variations, through diversifying and increasing crop production, reduces threats of pests and disease, and increases carbon sequestration in soils and biomass production.

Technical Application

To implement intercropping practices:

  • Step 1: Consider soil properties - has the soil been mono-cropped and/or is it leached?
  • Step 2: Consider crop characteristics – will crops be competing for nutrients, water space, sunlight or will they be mutually beneficial adding nutrients
  • Step 3: Prepare land through clearing and weeding. A no-tillage approach is recommended – see Technical Brief 12.
  • Step 4: Select whether the farmer should undertake Mixed Intercropping (Good for smaller plots however plants compete) or Row/Strip Intercropping (crops less likely to compete). See also KP07 – Climate Smart Planting Options for Maize and Sorghum.
  • Step 5: If mixed intercropping is selected, sow two crops simultaneously mixing seeds to together while planting. Harvesting may not be a simultaneous process as different crops have different growth rates and seasons.
  • Step 6: If row/strip intercropping plant two or more crops in the same field but in separate rows patterns. Rows should be spaced 50 cm apart and can have a row of 1:1 or 2:1 ratio of cereal crop to legume.
  • Step 7: Harvest as individual crops require, be careful not to disrupt other crops that have not yet matured.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Higher levels of production from the same area of land, due to healthier soils.
Increase Resilience
Reduces losses due to pests and diseases and can mitigate losses due to drought as they increase organic matter, with increased water holding capacity and stimulated bacterial growth.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Helps lock more carbon in the soil and plants.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_07_Intercropping_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Increased and diversified crop yield.
  • Food security/farm income increase.
  • Nutrient fixing.
  • Food security/farm income increase.

Drawbacks

  • Competition between plants for nutrients, water, space, etc.
  • Increase farmer workload as weeding, planting and harvesting are less efficient. Requires consideration especially if women’s workload increases as a result.

Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM)

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) refers to a set of agricultural practices that can be applied simultaneously to improve agricultural productivity through increasing soil nutrients and improving crop water use. ISFM includes a broad range of agricultural practices that have all been adapted to local conditions to improve soil nutrients and include the combined application of the following approaches:

  1. Utilisation of organic fertilisers such as green manure, compost and crop residues.
  2. Application of locally available soil amendment methods, such as lime and biochar.
  3. Implementation of techniques like germplasm, agroforestry, crop rotation, intercropping etc.
  4. Limited use of inorganic or mineral fertilisers – seen as the last option in ISFM, when other interventions are not achieving optimal results.

ISFM can be successful for most arable farmers and has been known to double productivity and increase farm-level incomes by 20 to 50 percent if implemented correctly. It focuses on a series of practical approaches to sustainable farm productivity through locally available and affordable options for maintaining soil fertility and productivity, and is seen as a viable approach to reduce over-reliance on inorganic fertiliser. ISFM permits short- and long-term increases in productivity of cash crops and food security, and is considered climate smart as the combined ISFM approach maximises fertiliser uptake and sequestration of carbon in soil, allowing sustainable agricultural intensification driven by improved soil structure and fertility.

Technical Application

In addition to agricultural inputs and the following technical implementation steps, ISFM requires the farmer to consider farm size (land area), and property rights (land tenure) to ensure that investments are efficient and sustainable.

To implement ISFM approaches, the following should be considered:

  • Step 1: Prepare a needs assessment based on understanding of farm challenges – low or declining productivity, soil fertility, low organic content, etc
  • Step 2: Measure fields that require attention to understand volumes of inputs required.
  • Step 3: Develop (or update) an agricultural calendar to use as a platform for discussion between farmer(s) extension officer(s).
  • Step 4: Develop plan and schedule/programme of locally appropriate ISFM interventions between farmer(s) and extension officer(s), obtaining guidance from agricultural suppliers where necessary (lime application, etc). As ISFM is a blended approach, the plan should consider short and medium to long term interventions and outcomes.
  • Step 5: Examine cost implications of the plan, revising where necessary based upon available resources, and if necessary/available apply for credit to fund investments.
  • Step 6: Assess labour requirements within the ISFM plan to ensure that they can be fulfilled, and considerations of gender and youth have been accommodated – women are not expected to do the majority of work, and children are not missing school.
Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Improves soil structure. Increases soil fertility.
Increase Resilience
Aims at sustainable intensification, increasing resilience through more predictable production.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ISFM has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions owing to greater uptake of Nitrogen-based fertilisers by crops and soil carbon sequestration.
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_06_ISFM_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Applying an ISFM approach can be a sustainable way to improve/rehabilitate soil fertility.
  • ISFM is intended to optimise a combination of CSA strategies to achieve maximum outcomes.
  • The focus should be on leveraging locally available materials and resources to improve productivity.
  • ISFM should be seen as a scalable approach, involving a range of interventions that match available inputs and financial and human resources.

Drawbacks

  • Lack of knowledge of applying the different strategies individually or in combination.
  • Potentially high transaction costs as the process involves multiple interventions.
  • Lack of credit facilities.
  • Availability of labour.

Green Manure

Value Chain
Climatic Zone
Water Source
Decision Making
Farming Characteristics
Mechanisation
Labour Intensity
Initial Investment
Maintenance Costs
Access to Finance/Credit
Extension Support Required
Access to Inputs
Access to Markets
Gender/Youth Smart
Description

Green manure (otherwise known as cover crops), is a climate smart fertiliser process that involves growing plants (mainly legumes) and distributing uprooted or sown crop-parts to wither and cover soil. It provides soil coverage to enhance biological, physical and chemical properties of soil while mitigating soil erosion, supressing weed growth, adding biomass to soils, improving soil structures, promoting biological soil preparation, and reducing pests, diseases and weed growth. These functions can increase economic return, reduce the need for herbicides and pesticides, while increasing productivity and potentially the quality of crops. It can also increase soil nitrogen, improve soil fertility, conserve soil humidity and reduce fertiliser costs. Green manure also has low management costs, presents good conservation characteristics, and improves biodiversity. Green manure is a feasible and sustainable option for farmers to improve soil quality and productivity, depending on local context and availability of different leguminous plants that best fit for farmers’ cropping systems. Examples of leguminous plants that can be used in southern Africa include: Mucuna (Mucuna pruriens); Sunhemp (Crotalaria juncea), Lab-lab (Lablab purpureus); Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan); Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and Butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea). Green manure has climate smart benefits as contributes to sustainable maintenance of agricultural production without the use of chemical fertilisers and depending upon the cover crop can contribute to adaptation of agricultural practices to climate change. Furthermore, coverage of soil with additional plant material can assist with carbon sequestration in soil. Not only does growing a secondary green manure crop provide a soil amendment benefit, but the crop can also be used as fodder for livestock. As the most common green manure plants are legumes, the pods and seeds can be fed to livestock while leaving the crop residue to perform the cover crop function in in the fields.

Technical Application

To effectively apply a green manure approach, the following should be considered:

  • Step 1: Select legumes that grow well under local conditions and in local soils. Green manure crops should be resilient and require few crop management practices. A thorough investigation should be made to ensure that green manure crops are appropriate for the local conditions in terms of rainfall, climate, soil pH and texture, and salt tolerance.
  • Step 2: Identify the appropriate time for planting the green manure crop to ensure growth, but not impacting the primary crop. Especially if the secondary crop is a climber/creeper. Main crop may need to be mature before planting the manure crop, as if a creeper, it may outcompete or constraint growth of maize or sorghum plants.
  • Step 3: If seeking to enrich soil properties, the farmer must allow crop residue to remain in the soil longer. This is particularly relevant with multiple uses – e.g. soil amendments and livestock fodder. In these cases, pods can be harvested for fodder, and the remaining plant residue left in the field to cover the soil.
  • Step 4: Crop planting should be alley cropped between the primary crop rows, allowing management of the primary and secondary crops, also reducing the competition between the primary and the secondary crop. If the secondary crop also has pest management properties, it may be beneficial to consider boundary planting.
  • Step 5: When harvesting the secondary crop, the farmer should consider leaving the residue in the ground. If it is uprooted, it should left on the soil surface. A common mistake is to remove it from the field and accumulate it in one location, missing the benefits of cover-crops, and exposing the residue to decay.

Unless local examples are available, small test plots should be used to test different cover crops to determine which is the most appropriate, and if necessary, demonstrate value to farmers and communities. As the secondary (green manure) crop is not a direct cash-crop, you may need to ensure expectations are measured. It may take several years to develop enough green manure crop to contribute to crop production; hence, crop production has to fit around existing cash/subsistence crops. Furthermore, benefits may not be realised within a single planting season., e.g. Nitrogen may only be available in the soil in the subsequent season.

Return on Investment Realisation Period
Crop Production
Fodder Production
Farm Income
Household Workload
Food Security
Soil Quality/Cover
Biological Diversity
Flooding
Crop/Livestock Water Availability
Wind Protection
Erosion Control
Increase Production
Green manure can maintain or increase agricultural productivity through improved soils.
Increase Resilience
Adjustment of practices to include cover crops allows farmers to diversify crop types, and produce their own fertilisers.
Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduction in carbon released from soil.
Additional Information
PDF File
/sites/secondsite/files/tb/CCARDESATechnicalBrief_02_GreenManure_2019-10-17_0.pdf
Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

  • Green Manure is a non-tillage method that promotes soil fertility through enhancement of soil organic content. In doing so, it mitigates erosion, maintains soil humidity, and promotes biological activity.
  • Many green manure plants can be used to feed livestock if there is an excess
  • Green manure cover crops also make organic matter to apply – compost requires work and time to develop, whereas this approach sees it added immediately.
  • Cover crops can reduce weed competition by shading soil.
  • If using legumes, they can thrive in poor quality soils.
  • Cover crops such as Cow pea can also be used for animal and human consumption.

Drawbacks

  • Require access to seedbanks for legumes and other viable cover crops.
  • May require the testing of crops in test plots prior to implementation.
  • If so, community action may be required to test varieties and make decisions.
  • Farmers may require more land to plant the same amount of the main crop, as they need to be intercropped with the cover crop. This can be unattractive to some farmers.
Subscribe to Positive

Funding Partners

4.61M

Beneficiaries Reached

97000

Farmers Trained

3720

Number of Value Chain Actors Accessing CSA

41300

Lead Farmers Supported